you are talking about with these statements, Grim.....what do entitlements have to do with her charges? What/who are the 'dregs of American society' and what does that statement have to do with her charges?
The only comments I have to make regarding her charges is "Facebook is a public site...it was used to raise money for his defense (to me, that means attorney representation, not necessarily for bond money). Did anybody (Zimmerman, his wife, his attorney) really think that nobody would think to check out the website to see how much had been collected so far? I mean, if it was public knowledge the site existed as a collection spot for donations, it stands to reason that somebody in law enforcement or an informant who formed an opinion about Zimmerman before trial would notify law enforcement about the funds there. Whether Zimmerman himself knew how much was there prior to his wife's jailhouse visit is questionable and is up to interpretation, but obviously his wife knew if you listen to her taped testimony and tried to hide that information. SHE may have been trying to use 'code' during her visit before bail was set, but that doesn't mean that HE realized she meant $186,000 instead of $186.00. According to statements his attorney has made, Zimmerman didn't have any way to check the Facebook page from jail prior to the bail hearing and could have honestly believed there wasn't anything there that amounted to anything....and Zimmerman himself didn't testify at that hearing; only his wife did. I just don't understand why his own attorney never checked the site ahead of time and, if he did, Zimmerman needs a new lawyer because the attorney allowed his wife to knowingly lie on the stand during that phone testimony. The only reason for the attorney to NOT check ahead of time was to give him 'deniability'....but that still makes him an incompetant and pretty shady representative.