Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year"
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) ![]()
- 11/7/07 1:26 PM
Do you agree with Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the Year"?
Yes (Please explain.)
No (Please explain.)
Don't care (Why not?)
by: Lee Koo (ADMIN) November 7, 2007 1:26 PM PST
0 people like this thread
Staff pick
Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year"
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) ![]()
- 11/7/07 1:26 PM
Do you agree with Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the Year"?
Yes (Please explain.)
No (Please explain.)
Don't care (Why not?)
No...
by thesimulacra - 11/8/07 8:16 AM
In Reply to: The iPhone is an Invention by Richard Spagna
"First of all the iPhone has patented innovations which are legally considered to be inventions."
You're talking about several small parts of the iPhone, not nearly the iPhone in its entirety. Saying the iPhone is an invention because its OS is an invention is like saying the first car that had a catalytic converter was an invention. The catalytic converter was an invention, the car that used it was NOT.
You'd really think it wouldn't be so hard for people to understand this but apparently it is!
the I-phone
by raremood55 - 11/8/07 5:58 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
don't really care if the I-phone is the best invention there ever was
I don't need it in my life that fancy of a phone .
and even with the cost reduction I heard they were giving it I live in kansas I suppose if you lived in the rat race like NY or LA .
it would be somthing great to own but in kansas I own A motorola thats pretty darn neat and the fact the oil companies want all my money to run my cars and heat my house the I-Phone is not even somthing we think about besides we just got fiber optics two months ago I'm not even sure and I-phone would work in middle kansas even know its finally getting better mid west still needs to catch up in the rural areas all I and my family needs is the cell phone to be a cell phone and the boy can tech message his brains out with his friends and now we even have reception in kansas it just doesn't get any better - folks who work for alltel thank you
Hell no! We won't go!
by The Santa Clause - 11/8/07 6:50 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Calling the i-phone a new invention is like calling the florecent light bulb a new light source. Calling the i-phone a new invention is like calling the flat screen TV the new invention of a TV. The subject has already been invented. Sure everything has its' modification and in it's own wright, be declaired as an improvement but not to be declaired as the inventor of something that already existed. The television has already been invented but through the years, modifications has been made to see it in color, then distortion free, then more pixeis has been added then it was boosted to the plasma level. But no one person declaired it to be a new invention or declair it a television again. It was just modifies. So as for the i-phone, all that was done was improved its' service. No new invention was made, or it would not have still been called a "PHONE".
i think
by winsoftwareman - 11/15/07 8:24 PM
In Reply to: Hell no! We won't go! by The Santa Clause
steve jobs says innovations. see!
Who Cares What Time Thinks?
by fmpdeveloper - 11/8/07 6:51 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Time magazine is not the sole arbiter of the "Invention of the Year", but they are being treated that way by those who are pleased/upset by their desigation of the iPhone as such.
After all, Time named both George W. Bush and Bill Clinton men of the year not once, but twice, so their track record on this sort of thing is pretty poor.
Well
by thesimulacra - 11/8/07 8:09 AM
In Reply to: Who Cares What Time Thinks? by fmpdeveloper
"Man of the Year" is not an honorary award, it's given to the person or thing that generated the most news that year. For instance past winners have included Adolf Hitler and Hurricane Katrina.
I think those of us who are upset by this feel like there have probably been a lot of fantastic inventions in the realms of science or technology or health that should have gotten the praise and exposure that comes with this award. TIME clearly just went for something that would generate publicity for their magazine article, like when they named "You" Person of the Year a few months ago. Though it was a bit corny, at least then they were pretty much right.
Invention of the year? NO!
by NoXious1 - 11/8/07 6:52 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Invention of the year? NO!
Product of the year...Ok.
Invention of the year winner should require tougher criteria.
Palm has been doing all this with Treos for years. Treos do have touchscreens. When I got my latest model almost a year ago; I immediately downloaded a program called iphony that totally makes my treo look like an iphone. For months, some folks thought it was a special Canadian iphone.
Also: With 60 and 80 gig ipods; how come the phone is so limited?
No, not invention of the year. That apple has a worm.
Apple did not invent the Cell Phone
by russtuttle - 11/8/07 7:26 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Not only did Apple not invent the "Cell Phone," they didn't even invent the "Smart Phone." Seems that Blackberry had the forsight to put a cell phone and a PDA together.
That being said, Apple HAS improved the software technology by several rungs on the ladder. I do think that this phones technology is at the top of the class. Unfortunately, I understand that AT&T has this phone locked up for a couple of years. Too Bad. I understand that another phone with similar technology will be available from Alltel soon.
Blackberry didn't invent the PDA phone, either
by xarophti - 11/22/07 5:52 PM
In Reply to: Apple did not invent the Cell Phone by russtuttle
sorry, Blackberry didn't put the cell phone and PDA together, either. Handspring did that back in 2000 (or earlier) with the VisorPhone module for their Handspring Visor PDAs. (You could call it the Treo's grandfather). I'm still using my VisorPhone. The main reason is I don't want to part with the Graffiti interface for text messages, organizer and other input. I don't do thumb piano, thank you. I just wish Treo would bring back a model with a Grafitti interface like the 180g was. Unfortunately, Handspring sold out to Palm and Palm punked out on the Graffiti interface for cell phones (or whoever it is that's making the cell phones that bought the Palm O/S for the organizer part...)
Don't think it's an invention
by andyb21 - 11/8/07 7:39 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
As many other people have already written, the iphone is not a new "invention". It is the combination of a bunch of other technologies in one device. That doesn't mean it's not cool though.
Even though it's cool, I didn't buy one. I need my phone for work and not just watching movies or listening to music. My main purpose for a device like an iphone is to use email remotely. The iphone allows you to read your messages great, but it takes forever to write a message with the touch screen. The blackberry's actual keypad is much easier to type out a long message. I have the 8800, and it also lets me watch movies and listen to music. It's not as nice as the iphone, but gets the job done in one device. I wish it had wireless internet access though. The wireless internet is really nice on the iphone.
I guess it's all what you're looking to do with the device as to which one you should purchase. Internet, music, and movies with email as a nice feature, iphone. Email as your primary purpose with those other things as nice to haves, some other device
Cell phones Forum
by thjones - 11/8/07 7:43 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
This whole debate is hair-splitting at best, unless legal liability can be established.
Wast of time!!
Not so much.
by schlice - 11/8/07 8:05 AM
In Reply to: Cell phones Forum by thjones
I think there's a very bright line between an "invention" and an "innovation."
In order for an invention to be patentable it must be new as defined in the patent law, which provides that an invention cannot be patented if: (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country more than one year prior to the application for patent in the United States...
Clearly, smartphones which do what the iPhone does have been around for a long time. No one is disputing that the iPhone may do it better than others, and that their marketing machine is genius. But is it "new"? No, it is not new as defined by patent law. It is a convergence device containing a music/video player, web browser, email client and cell phone. Those already exist. Apple's design can be patented, but the invention of a convergence device that does all those things could not be granted a patent by Apple, since it's already been done for years.
I'd suggest they win "Design of the Year" or "Product of the Year," but not "Invention of the Year."
iPhone with Files2Phones and other remote computing apps
by iPhoneKevin - 11/8/07 7:55 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
The iPhone with Files2Phones and other remote computing applications is amazing. The ability to launch large applications such as AutoCad or view large medical x-rays with the iPhone on my remote PC is awesome.
off-topic
by schlice - 11/8/07 8:07 AM
In Reply to: iPhone with Files2Phones and other remote computing apps by iPhoneKevin
A device's ability to do something better than other devices does not qualify it as an "invention," but as an "innovation."
The question was whether or not the iPhone should have been named "Invention of the Year."
The iPhone is not a new invention, you morons
by mikecary - 11/8/07 7:59 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Al Gore invented the iPhone years ago.
(NT) LMAO
by schlice - 11/8/07 8:06 AM
In Reply to: The iPhone is not a new invention, you morons by mikecary
Hey Mike Cary,
Don't get exited and remember this:
"5% of the people have hemorrhoids and 95% of the people are Perfect AHoles".
Many of the posters fall in the 95% category.
I'm weighing in with a "don't care" on this one
by Denisellen - 11/8/07 8:09 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
I'm in the 'don't care' camp about the iPhone being named the invention of the year. I also 'don't care' about any of the other Time magazine "of the year" declarations. They're trying to sell magazines. But I 'do care' that the data from every call an iPhone user makes (and all other cell users) are being collected and monitored by the NSA.
don't care
by Remag1234 - 11/8/07 11:18 AM
In Reply to: I'm weighing in with a "don't care" on this one by Denisellen
Deniseellen, what are you doing that you're worried about NASA collecting info. I suggest you find a VILLAGE as there is one somewhere missing an IDIOT.
NASA can listen to all my calls, but I warn them that they will be so bored they'll fall asleep.
NSA not NASA
by Denisellen - 11/8/07 1:55 PM
In Reply to: don't care by Remag1234
NSA is the National Security Agency. NASA is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The posting said NSA--not NASA. And please do refrain from insulting fellow posters.
It's not an invention!
by gwtomlinson - 11/8/07 8:16 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Saying the Apple invented the iPhone is like sayint McDonald's invented the Big Mac. Sure, in the most literal sense it's true, but the Big Mac is just another cheeseburger, and the iPhone is just an MP3player, cell phone, and touch-screen PDA stuck together sans duct tape. If slapping pre-existing inventions together is enough to get recognized as an innovator of new things, then I've been missing out on lots of money making opportunities.
Now pardon me while I go whip out the duct tape and get inventing.
iPhone not an invention
by Penguin_Blitz - 11/8/07 8:43 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
I agree that the iPhone is a great innovation but there is not one aspect of it that is either original or unique. It is great to have several hand-held devices in one pocket-size package, but even the idea behind that is nothing new. It is just unfortunate that the American market is so far behind the Japanese and even several European markets for technical advancements to be made available to the general public
iPhone Deserves Award
by mhersh - 11/8/07 8:59 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Of course, Apple did not invent the cellular phone. However, the iPhone is significant in the way it changes the game for the rest of the cellular industry. No longer will brands like Nokia and Motorola get away with the crap they've shoved down our throats for years and years. Apple designed the iPhone to be upgradable, just like Mac OS X itself. New features will be added, new applications will come. Because the device relies purely on a software based user interface, the user experience can be changed and refined over time, something that cannot be done with traditional phones. Sure, other mobile phones are capable of a firmware upgrade, but until now, there's never been a compelling reason for these companies to be bothered with fixing their firmware. They've never cared about the end user. That mentality will no longer be acceptable. The iPhone changes everything. Whether you love it or hate it, you will benefit from the iPhone. It raises the bar. It will encourage competition and spur innovation. I've owned a number of high end mobile phones and they've all been absolute crap in comparison to the iPhone. If you think the iPhone is good now, just wait until Apple opens the flood gates and allows the developers into the iPhone. It's not just a device, it's a platform, and already, it's a successful platform. No matter how much you hate Apple and love Microsoft, the iPhone is here to stay.
There's so much wrong with this post...
by schlice - 11/8/07 9:15 AM
In Reply to: iPhone Deserves Award by mhersh
...I don't even know where to start...
> Apple designed the iPhone to be upgradable, just like Mac OS X itself.
Right. No other cell phone has upgradable firmware.
> New features will be added, new applications will come.
At the behest of Apple. Where's the innovation there? Closing your platform? That seems like a step backwards to me.
> Because the device relies purely on a software based user interface, the user experience can be changed and refined over time, something that cannot be done with traditional phones.
HUH??? On what planet have you come from? Have you not seen any other smartphone? Ever? What, because it has a soft keyboard, it's more modifiable than any other smartphone? Sorry, that statement is 100% incorrect. The iPhone is more closed than anything else out there! You make it sound so seamless, but when a simple firmware upgrade can wreck every other 3rd party piece of software on the phone, that's pretty lame coding. They're stifling innovation, not encouraging it. Who'd want to add apps to the iPhone now? Hackers, maybe, but that's about it.
> Whether you love it or hate it, you will benefit from the iPhone. It raises the bar. It will encourage competition and spur innovation.
Finally! A true statement!
BUT
Your post is off-topic.
The question was "Does the iPhone deserve to be called the 'Invention of the Year'?"
You didn't answer that question. You told us why you think the iPhone is great. And in some cases, you're right. It is innovative, and it will encourage companies to think differently about the devices they manufacture, and that's great for the industry.
But it's far from an invention.
And here's what's wrong with *your* post...
by mhersh - 11/8/07 11:27 AM
In Reply to: There's so much wrong with this post... by schlice
"Right. No other cell phone has upgradable firmware"
I addressed this in my original post. Didn't you read it? How many cell phone manufacturers actually release firmware updates for their phones? How many of them actually improve the end user experience? Of the number of phones I've owned, not once did I receive a firmware update. Not once did Motorola refine it's UI. Apple's already added new features and refinements to the UI.
"At the behest of Apple. Where's the innovation there? Closing your platform? That seems like a step backwards to me."
Hello! Where have you been? Under a rock? Apple is opening up the iPhone to developers. There will be a native SDK soon. This whole "closed platform" FUD won't apply much longer. Run with it while you can.
"What, because it has a soft keyboard, it's more modifiable than any other smartphone?"
Yes, it is. The possibilities are endless.
"You make it sound so seamless, but when a simple firmware upgrade can wreck every other 3rd party piece of software on the phone, that's pretty lame coding."
Hm... Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Apple, for the moment, doesn't support 3rd party software or even intend for it to be installed on the iPhone. By using such hacks, you do so at your own risk. Myself, I can stand to wait for the official SDK and officially support applications. Yes, it will be seamless. Why is it lame for Apple not to support hacked iPhones with 3rd party applications? How does it make any sense at all for Apple to support them? It doesn't. It's impractical and retarded. Apple's not going to stop iPhone development dead in it's tracks for a few hacked iPhones.
"They're stifling innovation, not encouraging it."
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Nothing could be farther from the truth. If they were stifling innovation, there wouldn't be so much drivel written about an "iPhone killer."
"But it's far from an invention."
It's not an invention, it's an innovation. They might not have invented every single piece of technology in the iPhone, but they did a damn good job putting it all together and giving it a great interface. That's what Apple does. It's the same thing they did with the Macintosh and the iPod. They just build a better product with a better user experience. Get over it.
uh. innovation? invention?
by winsoftwareman - 11/15/07 8:30 PM
In Reply to: iPhone Deserves Award by mhersh
you just said that they improved it. then why are you saying that it should win the best invention award?
It should be...but wait!!!
by wliang - 11/8/07 10:18 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Ok, i have an iphone and i take it with me everywhere. I have my movies, tv shows on it. my email is always with me. safari is great.
BUT...the iphone is apple's first entry into the mobile phone world. What about 3G data speeds?? yeah, people want a 3G iphone. steve jobs announced back in january that a 3G iphone would come in the future.
Some things I would like to see included in their next model:
-more memory. say, 25GB??
-High speed data
-Better battery life. It's fine now but it could be better.
I think those are the things that consumers are looking forward to.
TIME can name the iphone "invention of the year". but what if apple releases the next generation of the iphone at macworld in january 2008? this time next year, will the newer iphone be the best invention of 2008? Cell phone manufacturers are taking note of the iphone's strengths and weaknesses. Though they may not replicate the multi-touch interface. there are phones out there right now that rival the iphone. If apple keeps on truckin, they'll keep being loved.
I say iphone should be invention of the year. i wanna see the cover of that magazine.
invention?
by winsoftwareman - 11/15/07 8:32 PM
In Reply to: It should be...but wait!!! by wliang
by the way, they didn't invent it. iphone is a name, and the brought devices together, which we have done in the past. no invention there!
No, but why would we let Time Magazine decide
by winsleuth - 11/8/07 10:53 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Never seen one in person but the technology for this was out there. I think it is awesome, cool, but not greatest and there was a lot of deception in the initial release leading many to disappointment. No points from me on incredible marketing. Very glad I didnt get stuck with the ones whose battery doesnt come out, what a step backwards. A magazine like Popular Science or even deeper, Scientific American, I would like to see what they would pick or if there even were any outstanding developments this year, 'that your average Time reader would understand'. I dont look to Time when I want an evaluation of technology and insights into developments in Pure Science. The most amazing thing that happened this year concerning Apple is they actually dropped the price on something in the course of a year. To me that was totally unexpected and the first time Apple ever behaved like they were a normal company. This may be an even greater move than releasing the phone itself. I will now look to Apple for products in the future, I never would have before just as I have always tried to avoid anything Sony.
Yes, I Agree
by chuck1jones - 11/8/07 11:31 AM
In Reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Mainly for the whole design and colletion of so may features, the fact that it is so small, can do so much, and for the majority of the puplic react beautifly, to the way they want it to - is my reson for thinking it should be "invention of they year"
P.S. the interface is a new invention and that alone is very well put together.
Moderator
CNET Staff
Samsung Staff
Dell StaffYou are e-mailing the following post: Post Subject
You are reporting the following post: Post Subject
You are posting a reply to: Post Subject
Thank you, , your post has been submitted.
> Click here to view your post. > Manage your tracked discussions. > Track this discussion. CloseThank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.
Close

