Hey
I'm trying to buy a 3D TV and I'm still debating between LG Cinema 3D TV and Samsung 3D TV.
Owners of either of these, if you could please share your experiences, that would be really helpful.
Thanks!
by: hurjennifer July 31, 2011 9:49 PM PDT
1 person likes this thread
Staff pick
Hey
I'm trying to buy a 3D TV and I'm still debating between LG Cinema 3D TV and Samsung 3D TV.
Owners of either of these, if you could please share your experiences, that would be really helpful.
Thanks!
hurjennifer has chosen the best answer to his/her question!
Click here to view the answer that was selected.
Total posts: 17 (Showing page 1 of 1)
jennifer
by MyIQis185 - 7/31/11 10:39 PM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
Before I started using this site and reading up on anything Samsung, LG related, I just coughed on them. Now it seems like Cinema 3D is actually a good TV and Samsung's TVs are looking a bit overrated according to users.
Cough?
by Sony3DTech - 7/31/11 10:53 PM
I admit, Samsung is hardly making any good TVs lately. They have posted losses for the second consecutive quarter for 2011. These were significant drops, (%26.3, 22.8 respectively). But I do think they make better TVs than LG.
Sony's 3D department is now achieving many new technological advances that haven't been released to the public yet. Consumers should get ready soon.
yeah I agree
by FrancisAllen - 8/1/11 2:17 AM
yeah I agree with MyIQis185 that LG Cinema 3D is a really good TV. I own one myself and I've never experienced any flicker or crosstalk problem. It's a passive 3D TV so it gives you better quality images than does Samsung's 3D TV, which is an active 3D TV.
I used to have a Samsung TV but the active shutter tech glasses made me get a headache not even half an hour into viewing... which is annoying, considering what I paid. Then I switched to LG's Cinema 3D... I was afraid that I'd feel the loss but I took a chance because of the cheaper price... And boy was I pleased! The glasses are battery free and the 3D tech is flicker free so I am FREE of headaches! I love my new 3D TV... much nicer and has some pretty neat features, like 2D to 3D conversion. Which is exactly what you hear... you can watch anything in 3D with this TV set!
Oh, and another satisfying thing about Cinema 3D is that I can watch it lying down, or moving around. I couldn't do that with my Samsung set because it made me dizzy and the glasses wouldn't work well.. So yeah, having Cinema 3D has made me appreciate passive tech!
hope this helps ![]()
The truth about Passive 3D vs. Active Shutter 3D systems!
by relfaithsp - 8/1/11 8:28 PM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
There are some big misconceptions out there about passive 3D technology (LG and Vizio sets) versus shutter style systems (Samsung, Sony, etc.). People have made claims that passive systems (sets that use the same glasses as the movie theater without batteries) are only getting 540p resolution, where shutter systems (battery operated glasses that blink back and forth) get 1080p resolution. This claim is completely false, and I'll explain why the naysayers are not only wrong, but why passive systems have better motion, brightness, and look a whole lot better.
The Technology:
Passive 3D TV's have a polarized screen and lenses, that alternate horizontal lines of resolution per eye in every frame you see. What this means is that each eye sees a 540p picture in every single single frame of a movie. BUT, it takes the image combined from both eyes to create a 3D image in your brain. Since both L and R eye images exist in every frame you see, your brain combines them as a single 1080p 3D image! What's better is that if you are watching a 24 frames per second blu-ray, with a passive 3d set, you get both L and R eye images 24 times per second as you should, giving you a full 1080p 3D image 24 times per second, with very smooth motion and a brighter picture, along with no headaches that some people get from blinking lenses! Want proof? Watch "Open Season 3D" and look at the millions of hairs on the bear. Each hair can be seen vividly, with no breakup in resolution or clarity. If it weren't 1080p that infinitely small detail would not be possible.
Now, what about the active shutter system? This system alternates frames of a movie, a 1080p image for the L eye, then a 1080p image for the right eye, back and forth, and the glasses blink back and forth to match the frames on the screen with your eyes. What people don't realize is that your brain still needs to combine one image for each eye in order to see a 3D image in your head. When you are watching a 24 frames per second blu-ray, there are only 12 frames per second for each eye, blinking back and forth! So you really only see 12 frames per second of 1080p 3D watching 3D with active shutter sets! This is what creates very blurry motion, a darker picture, and helps enhance the headache people get from shutter systems.
Conclusion:
So the truth is that both types produce a 1080p 3D picture, but with a passive set like in the movie theaters (RealD, Vizio, LG, Cinema 3D) you still get 24 frames per second 1080p 3D, but with an active shutter system (Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, etc.) you only get 12 frames per second 1080p 3D! Also, both types of 3D systems will display all of the 3D blu-ray discs. (as long as you have a 3D blu-ray player)
In the real world:
I tested every set I could in person. I took a 3D blu-ray with me so that I could see the same material on all the sets in broad daylight in the stores. I was very disappointed in the active shutter systems that I viewed. They lost a lot of brightness under daylight, and the motion was blurry. Plus I didn't want to pay hundreds of dollars for glasses and batteries. When I tested the LG and Vizio Theater 3D systems, I was happily surprised. The pictures were brighter, crystal clear, and I could bring home recycled glasses from the movie theater for free to use with the sets! I loved LG's 50" and 55" Theater 3D sets, but since a bigger screen is better in my house, I bought the 65" Vizio with Theatre 3D from Sam's Club. It's an amazing set with fantastic wireless internet apps as well, but for 3D content, there is not a better TV out there to date! (until they make an 80" Theater 3D set! maybe in a couple years).
Please feel free to copy, paste, and share this review anywhere you like! More people need accurate information on 3D technology!
Thanks,
Steve S.
really?
by Sony3DTech - 8/1/11 11:26 PM
In Reply to: The truth about Passive 3D vs. Active Shutter 3D systems! by relfaithsp
Ok. You sound like a noob whos trying to sound like he knows what hes talking about.
The reason why Passive 3D TV can be considered 1080p is because of the method you mentioned above but you forgot to mention this interlacing method takes place at 2-3 hundreths of a second making the eye unable to catch the distinction between passive and active from a distance. If you're sitting close to the TV, you will notice the temporal compression caused by the interlacing method, ( jagged lining, horizontal lines).
Note* Where do you get information about FPS @ 24 for passive and 12 for active? This information is absolutely false, even if you mean for each eye, which is in the case for active. The only way that low amount of fps would be possible is if a program is converted into 3D on the cheapest lowest Hz rated active TV.
I will admit however that LG's Cinema 3D TVs have shown less of this effect resulting in a clearer image than Vizio. If i had to put my money on one of the two, It would definitely be the LG. They have a special advanced film over their LCD's that even Sony's tech people can't replicate which is why Sony plans on releasing their passive TVs in 2012.
really? Really!
by relfaithsp - 8/2/11 6:47 AM
In Reply to: really? by Sony3DTech
My information is 100% accurate, but there's always someone who wants to argue. First, I'm an electrconics technician for a living. Second, there is no interlacing with passive technology, the interlacing is in the shutter systems. All blu-rays are recorded at 24fps, just like film. If each eye only gets half of the frames (shutter systems), then you only see 12 fps in 3D. Try learning something before slamming an honest explanation that I gave people.
really??
by MyIQis185 - 8/2/11 5:58 PM
In Reply to: really? Really! by relfaithsp
Wow, you basically stated that you are the Worlds most incompetent electronics technician with the first three sentences you wrote. Passive technology has no interlacing? Are you kidding me? Passive 3D shows images through alternating pixel alignments by.....how?????? UH INTERLACING......
http://neuron2.net/LVG/interlacing.html
I'm not going to waste my time writing interlacing 101 for you.
I do give you credit for the numbers of the blueray @ 24 fps.
BR 24fps and Sony
by Dan Filice - 9/29/11 3:42 PM
In Reply to: really? Really! by relfaithsp
Your quote: "All blu-rays are recorded at 24fps" I thought only film-content blu-rays are processed at 24fps. What about video-sourced blu-rays that originate on video shot at 60fps (59.94). These are still 60fps on the blu-ray disk, no?
To Sony3DTech: I love my Sony 120Hz TVs, but please tell me that Sony has figured out a way to avoid the dreaded Soap Opera effect (for non-3D) I see on so many 240Hz sets which seems to be the default refresh rate for 3-D sets today.
re
by pavelmass - 9/28/11 10:27 PM
In Reply to: The truth about Passive 3D vs. Active Shutter 3D systems! by relfaithsp
Too much crap in this answer.
"Please feel free to copy, paste, and share this review anywhere you like! More people need accurate information on 3D technology!" Laughing my ass off
oh boy...
by cesaur - 5/31/12 4:35 AM
In Reply to: The truth about Passive 3D vs. Active Shutter 3D systems! by relfaithsp
You are so wrong... And saying that scientists and experts are liars... No words for it.
Your theory is biased - if not COMPLETELY FALSE - and you didn't research and payed attention of the new polarized technology, created by LG, how BD players work, methods of 3d transmitting, what 3D is doing over hdmi and no knowledgde regarding the hdmi specs.
Let me explain the simple facts in short fashion.
- In theory, a polarized image (passive 3d) is HALF RESOLUTION and in practise, this still is outputted HALF RESOLUTION and this will NEVER CHANGE.
With LG's FPR method, it looks like this polarized image is pure (=FULL) 1080p, which in FACT is NOT. It uses 2 cycles of 60/100/120/200 hz, where on the screen, without glasses, it looks like a full 1080p image, where in fact it's still 540p.
This corrects your false statement that passive polarized 3d is displaying true / full 1080p.
- Next... You claim that active 3d from BD players only output 12fps per eye... WRONG!! 3D from BD-players over hdmi 1080p can ONLY output 1080p/24 for hdmi 1.3 and hdmi 1.4(a) and those come FRAME PACKED. The active shutter glasses do have a higher refreshrate than 24*2, so they display it 24fs.
This corrects your false statement that active shutters display only 12fps per eye.
Any video which displays as 12fps is very unjoyable, if not impossible to watch for even a short period of time.
- Next... You claim that 12fps causes headache with the shutter glasses. As read before, it's 24fps, which is NOT causing the headache. Active shutter glasses can cause headache, because of their refresh rate.
You are confusing refreshrate of display vs fps of content, which is COMPLETY UNRELATED IN A HEADACHE USE CASE.
If you think that 12fps content is causing headaches, hell everyone can watch 3d tv if it supported 24hz... It's not and there is a reason for it. That's why 3d tv's have at least 120hz or min 60hz for checkerboard.
The headache can be caused by low refresh rates of displays, NOT the fps of content and since many passive 3d tv's comes with over 200hz (refreshrates), the differences will be huge.
Get your facts straight.
Next time, before you make FALSE statements, do your research or don't post bs like this.
I hate it when false information is being spread out, since other readers will pick it up and try on their own convincing others with false information, causing misleading purchases and true knowledgde.
I agree except I can't set the 3D Depth Control.
by corneliousm - 6/3/12 8:53 PM
In Reply to: The truth about Passive 3D vs. Active Shutter 3D systems! by relfaithsp
I bought the LM6700 55 inch, for the most part I'm happy with it. However, when I try to set the 3D Depth Control all options are greyed out except auto 2D to 3D. Any ideas?
Love my LG Cinema 3D
by AndielynP - 8/6/11 3:20 PM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
I recently purchased an LG Cinema 3D (47LW5600) and I love it. I love the passive 3D, and everything else about my choice. Although the Smart TV features are still in their infancy and I'm underutilizing them, I love being able to access Amazon Instant Prime so easily. The Magic Motion wand remote is really handy, but I haven't found that it totally replaces the other remote. One of my pet peeves is multiple remotes but I am living with it.
There is some discussion here whether ARC works or not and it seems to be working for me, but I'm not sure I know what I'm missing. ![]()
I am connecting wirelessly with a supplied dongle (included). It takes up one extra USB port but I don't think that's an issue.
All in all I'm very happy with my choice and personally wouldn't consider active 3D due to being prone to light-triggered headaches (like flickering fluorescent lights.) No problems so far with passive. Plus the glasses are cheap and comfortable!
Good luck on your decision.
TV and Sound
by N1tro2011 - 9/29/11 6:55 AM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
I would prefer the Samsung 3D TV - you should prefer a good Hifi Cinema Sound System also, so you can get a very good Sound in physical demonstration. I have a very good german News about this found here about audio physic
You should read this - its very interesting about the perfect harmony with the Sound.
Samsung SmartTV UN55D8000YF and Samsung BD-D5500 BD Player3D
by afcw1969 - 4/24/12 12:11 PM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
Since July 2011 I have enjoyed the SmartTV picture quality and built-in speakers with all DVDs, including the new Blu-ray format that have outstanding reality coming right out of the 55" screen that is framed by a very thin titanium edge. Depending on the DVD format the movie may fill the entire screen or there may be those upper and lower black bars. Also, older DVDs do not have as sharp resolution as the HD and BD DVDS, so those do show less picture quality. I passed on getting Samsung 2.1 Sound Bar as the volume and audio quality from the TV is excellent as is. The BD player and Monster Power Center sit on a smoked glass 52" TV stand with some crystal-brass lamps and other knic-knacs and DVDs.. Monster HDMI cable with the best and fastest signal is used to connect the player and TV. Black out drapes cut out most outside light and give me lots of privacy.
Also, I watch some internet international TV news on full screen that is quite awesome. My 55" screen makes everything bigger than life. It is mounted with a Rocket Fish mount high up on the vaulted ceiling in my bedroom where I sit on my futon at the other end of my 13' bedroom or on the bed facing the SmartTV. It is very laid back for me.
There are so many features including internet access, slower than PCs - a con, and so many applications to choose from.
One other con is that I have no control over Samsung's updates, whether or not to allow them, like you can do with Microsoft's Windows Updates.
Skype video calls are fantastic using Samsung's Smart TV Camera CY-STC1100.
So as you can see, I got all Samsung Smart TV, Player, and Camera products. Best Buy set it all up for me, especially the wall mount that needed tools that I did not have. I used to have my misgivings about Samsung. However, I recommend Samsung at this time. My 2011 Samsungs are all good.
3D TVs
by pinkzroxor - 5/14/12 12:35 AM
In Reply to: Owners of LG Cinema 3D and Samsung 3D TVs by hurjennifer
I used to always go with Samsung when it comes to TV but recently, I've noticed a great deal of improvements in LG's TV technology and I wasn't disappointed when I switched over. Their quality and designs are outstanding, especially the LG 3D Cinema screen TVs. Choosing a TV really depends on your preference but i just wanna say ignore all the bias and really look at the TV. You might find something different.
Total posts: 17 (Showing page 1 of 1)
Moderator
CNET Staff
Samsung Staff
Dell StaffYou are e-mailing the following post: Post Subject
You are reporting the following post: Post Subject
You are posting a reply to: Post Subject
Thank you, , your post has been submitted.
> Click here to view your post. > Manage your tracked discussions. > Track this discussion. CloseThank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.
CloseYou are requesting a clarification of the question: Post Subject
Thank you, , your post has been submitted.
> Click here to view your post. > Manage your tracked discussions. > Track this discussion. CloseThank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.
CloseYou are posting an answer to the question: Post Subject
Thank you, , your post has been submitted.
> Click here to view your post. > Manage your tracked discussions. > Track this discussion. CloseThank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.
CloseClick here to be notified via e-mail when someone submits an answer.
Would you like to resolve this question? close
