Alert from CNET Staff

 Attention forum users:  There will be a forum outage today (May 28th) from 2PM to 6PM PST in preparation to migrate the Off Topic forums onto our new forums platform. During this outage, the forums will be placed in read only mode--where you can read the forums content as usual, however, posting in the forums will be disabled. We do apologize for the inconvenience that this may have caused. Thank you!

-Lee Koo, CNET Community manager

PC hardware forum: Hard drive data transfer rate question...

by: bestsealer December 29, 2006 8:27 PM PST

Like this

0 people like this thread

Staff pick

Hard drive data transfer rate question...

by bestsealer - 12/29/06 8:27 PM

I have a concern about the speed of a new system I recently bought. It is an Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 processor on an MSI Neo-F P965 motherboard with 2 GB or RAM. The hard drive is a Seagate 320 GB SATA3, (model ST3320620AS). This drive is supposed to have a max throughput of 3 Gbits per second.

I suspected the HD data transfer rate was not as fast as I expected it should be, and today after buying an additional drive, I did some tests. I had a ton of media files on the C: drive, and after installing and formatting the new D: drive (which incidentally, is the same model as the original C: drive) I decided to time the transfer rate by moving the media files from the C: drive to the new D: drive.

It took 124 minutes to copy 243.5 GB of data from the C: drive to the D: drive. By my calculations, that works out to about 32.73 MBytes per second, or slightly less than 300 Mbits per second - I am guestimating this by allowing 9 bits per byte to cover overhead. Still, 300 Mbits is a far cry from 3 Gbits!

When installing the new drive, I noticed there was a 'default' jumper on the drive, that limited the transfer rate to 1.5 Gbits per second. (ref: ). I also noticed that the original drive also still had this jumper installed. I left both jumpers in place. I spoke with the dealer who built the system about this, and he said they never remove the jumper - that the actual transfer rate is controlled by the motherboard and that my motherboard was very new and would override this jumper and do a 3 Gbit transfer, not 1.5 as the jumper was set.

Now, I have a hard time believing this, especially in light of my recent data transfer test. I wrote to Seagate to inquire about this, but still have not had a reply - it is Christmas time after all, and I don't expect them to get back to me before next year. However, even if the jumper was limiting the transfer rate, and even if removing it doubled the rate to 600 Mbits, that is still a far cry from 3 Gbits.

So, my question is: am I being unrealistic in expecting a faster data transfer rate with this system?


Forum Icon Legend

  • UnreadUnread
  • ReadRead
  • Locked threadLocked thread
  • ModeratorModerator
  • CNET StaffCNET Staff
  • Samsung StaffSamsung Staff
  • Norton Authorized Support TeamNorton Authorized Support Team
  • AVG StaffAVG Staff
  • avast! Staffavast! Staff
  • Webroot Support TeamWebroot Support Team
  • Acer Customer Experience TeamAcer Customer Experience Team
  • Windows Outreach TeamWindows Outreach Team
  • DISH staffDISH staff
  • Dell StaffDell Staff
  • Intel StaffIntel Staff
  • QuestionQuestion
  • Resolved questionResolved question
  • General discussionGeneral discussion
  • TipTip
  • Alert or warningAlert or warning
  • PraisePraise
  • RantRant

You are e-mailing the following post: Post Subject

Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose.

Sorry, there was a problem emailing this post. Please try again.

Submit Email Cancel

Thank you. Sent email to


Thank you. Sent email to


You are reporting the following post: Post Subject

If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements or commercial links

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Sorry, there was a problem submitting your post. Please try again.

Submit Report Cancel

Your message has been submitted and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.


Your message has been submitted and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.


You are posting a reply to: Post Subject

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to the CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to CBS Interactive Site Terms of Use.

You are currently tracking this discussion. Click here to manage your tracked discussions.

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

Sorry, there was a problem submitting your post. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem generating the preview. Please try again.

Duplicate posts are not allowed in the forums. Please edit your post and submit again.

Submit Reply Preview Cancel

Thank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.