Are today's new computer hard drives just simply junk?
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) ![]()
- 12/21/12 9:36 AM
Question:
Are today's new computer hard drives just simply junk?
Very simple question but I think the answer might not be. I read the forums often, but may have missed something addressing this. I have found that old hard drives of 10+ years would last so much longer than the ones currently on the market. Today, you could expect 2-3 years out of a hard drive, and that's if you're lucky.
When people ask me what hard drive to buy, I have recommended buying the smallest one that would suit their needs, but that's no answer. I feel that hard drive manufacturers are trying to get too much storage without increasing disc plate volume (size). Maybe I should be recommending to people to buy the more expensive ones that are 2-3 times price to ensure reliability -- am I wrong?
I really have no answer for people that ask. I just know that I personally back up to 4 portable hard drives then disconnect them from the computer. This is to insure that if one or two fail, I have redundancy and nothing is lost.
Believe it or not, I had one hard drive that I used once for one backup on it and 2 years later tried to backup more information on it and it was completely dead. I even stored it properly. I eventually sent it in to the manufacture for repair under warranty.
My question is two part: Why do the prices vary so much on hard drives? Should I break the bank and spend money on the higher cost hard drives to expect better reliability or keep thinking that all the new hard drives are junk? Thanks for any insight on this.
--Submitted by: Dave


Moderator
CNET Staff
Samsung Staff
Dell Staff