Speakeasy forum: Outlaw billionairs????

is because he is almost quoting BO word for word during his first campaign when he said something to the effect of "how much money do you need once you get to a million"........the handwriting was on the wall then, and it is still the same attitude among his 'type'....except for friends like Buffett and Immelt who will never have enough, but they never get criticized by BO.

so you're the one that's reaching, Josh. I'm telling what he actually DID say during his first campaign when he was talking about spreading the wealth because he believes that nobody who has over a million doesn't need it so they shouldn't have a problem with having some of it taken from them.......as if he has the authority to determine who needs or wants want.

and you know it.......he just got the tax hike he insisted on rather than the loophole revenue that Boehner offered the day after the election, and now we know why. As soon as the vote was done, he went on the airwaves and now says that he's looking for MORE in the way of closing those same loopholes. He couldn't accept Boehner's offer because otherwise he would have never gotten the tax hikes, Josh. He's a greedy pig who hates capitalism.

what he wants to do........ and you seem to be perfectly okay with that. In addition, the CBO has just reported that it is no longer the top 1% who will be paying 40% of all taxes.....it's now the top .7%...........thank you, BO.

You're 'just saying"

He's

almost quoting BO word for word

And YOU said

"almost quoting BO word for word"

BO is Obama isn't he?..the guy "being almost quoted"?....

The guy almost quotes Obama word for word...and they're NOT saying the same thing?

Interesting.

almost?...word for word?...Pretty close to the same position?...That's my take.

How bout you...why use those terms?

Your escape route, Hobbit Hole?

>>>is because he is almost quoting BO word for word during his first campaign when he said something to the effect of "how much money do you need once you get to a million">>>

It was obvious at that point that BO planned to take a large chunk, both in the case of tax RATES increasing as well as taking the loopholes away. It won't come to the 100% that the idiot wants taken, but BO has already got half of what he intends to take, and is now going to work on the second half.

When you have no respect for capitalism, you take whatever you feel you can get away with....ask France with their 75% that they just had handed back to them. Of course, France being France, they will just take that same bill, reword it, and eventually get it passed. BO can't get away with taking 100%, but he will take as much of it as he thinks he can get away with.

at 100%, tell me how much you DO think they should be taxed and allowed to keep since it's THEIR money and not the government's?

stated was almost a quote was correct. I never said BO wanted to take 100% of it. I didn't stretch anything that I actually stated. Do you dispute that BO actually said what I paraphrased and do you dispute that this guy actually asked the same question regarding "how much do you need" when HE wanted anything above that amount redistributed to people like HIM who don't have that kind of money?

...of outrageous socialist envy, I'd convert much of it to gold and just store it, thereby removing the wealth from the economy, unlike when it's banked and lent at interest which helps the economy. These billionaires need to start thinking of how to remove their wealth so it can no longer be traced, hidden from all but them, and wait for this all to blow over.

You think life is like bowling or golf, a game where "handicaps" are given out? Helping (GIVING) during an emergency, as conservatives did ALSO, (something you conveniently forget), is a lot different than TAKING. This is your whole problem when it comes to politics and economics, you can't tell the difference between GIVING and TAKING.

is that HE is the one who decides at what 'point you've made enough money' and taxes at a higher rate and takes away tax credits once you've reached that level......so that he can use that money to spend on his own personal agenda and not yours. He treats other people's money as if it all belongs to him or the government, and takes away the incentive for those companies to 'keep on making more'.