I would cut them, yes......
especially the amounts they receive since they are already three times higher than what a private sector job equal to what the job is would get paid.
Something I found interesting that came up last evening.......BO has been in office for slightly more than 1400 days.......and yet he has increased the government payroll by 95 jobs PER DAY since he took office. And he's not done yet. Most of those jobs were to increase or create new departments/agencies that go along with BO's agendas (more EPA, more IRS, more czars, more security for people like Jarrett, etc).
I also found it interesting that although there are statements made here that 1000 jobs have been cut from 'local, state' and federal' governments, I could only find where state and local governments were the ones doing the cutting; whereas BO has added another 14,250 jobs with much better pay scales and benefits than the local/state governments could possibly pay. The difference is that States are required by law to balance a budget (even the point where one city laid off their entire police department because they had no funds to pay them), whereas the Feds aren't required to balance a budget and just keep printing the money.
Fed Reserve is already planning to do another QE-3 with the money (plus adding to it) with the money they just got ($5B) as profit from selling the AIG stock, all the while knowing that even though by law they are required to have a budget every year and have thumbed their nose at that for the last four years in a row and plan to ignore it again.
When does this administration become accountable for their actions (non-actions)? When does this Administration stop flaunting it to the people that they are above the very laws that their own emploERS are required to follow?
Was this reply helpful? (0) (0)