Speakeasy forum: The new Bush candidate, George P. Bush, Jeb's kid

isn't a citizen of the US. The paperwork is already filled out in the Embassy in Ottawa. 2 Citizens produce a citizen.

Rob

.....I'll have to guess that the writer or editor didn't know that the Navy would only be "in" Afghanistan by way of aircraft flying over the country. I'm sure it's just an editorial mistake.

As far as genetics goes, I've said before that if the Bush family was the Corleones, Jeb would be Michael, W would be Fredo and Neil would be Sonny.

when it comes to our USNavy and where and what types of positions they serve in throughout the world. They no longer just 'swab a deck' and raise a sail. In addition to 'regular' sailors with special skilled jobs including rebuilding abilities, where do you think SEALs come from?

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/11/dod-sailor-killed-kevin-ebbert-112612/

https://www.google.com/search?q=USNavy+in+Afghanistan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Rob could play the horse head, JP could be the fish, ..... I'm still trying to find a role for you.

You hinted that the kid lied about his service record, just as you have posted previously that his uncle did, and took to insulting the author instead.........and you're still doing it within the newest post. This is the kind of crap that BO pulled regarding Romney........it started before Romney was even the nominee and never let up. You've decided to start early as well.......why? because he's a BUSH and a Republican. Spread a lie early and long enough and people will believe it, right?

>>>says he served "in" Afghanistan.

Am I overly nit-picky when I point out that Afghanistan has no coastline? or is the author Geographically Challenged?>>>

The 'hint' was that either the subject of the story lied about serving "IN" Afghanistan since there is no way any SAILOR could serve IN a country with no coastline (so YES, he DID question the subject's service record)........."OR" the author is mentally deficient.

and it still comes out the same.......either the subject lied saying he served "IN" Afghanistan because he couldn't possibly have done that since there is no coastline 'or' the author is a mental defect. Which indicates that Rob was questioning the subject's service record (just as he did with Bush 43) AND/OR the author. If he was only questioning the author, he would have said so.....he didn't.