Speakeasy forum: Seems that the liberals here

And a persons record wouldn't be considered an Achilles heel?

His challengers would focus on that and not whether or not the person was fit for office.Once elected, that qualifier is closed.

Fit for office one term, you're fit for office twice?...Tell Toni.

Toni argues, Look at what he's done in the last 4 years...he's not fit to be President for another 4 years.

which distracted people from looking at the painter.

They looked and didn't see the same thing you did. Their eyes are bad...not yours?...Just ask you?

Life goes on...My suggestion to you is

Make the best of what you consider a bad situation..stay healthy, try not to lose any sleep, weather the storm, or you, James and Toni can share a moving van.

How long does one cry about the outcome of an election before they move on?

Obama wins, Fox News (almost) experiences the five stages of grief

Several American businesses reacted to the news of President Obama's re-election with both anger and despair, as one McDonald's location hung the Stars and Stripes upside-down and at half-mast.

includes gender, wealth, and age, Josh.......he managed to not only divide the country by race, but went out of his way to divide it by the other groups in order to win. As far as religion goes, the majority of the country IS Christian, or some faction of it........he went out of his way to split it along Muslim lines without coming right out and saying it out loud because of his attitude toward the Black Panthers (who are Muslim for the most part and always have been), the Muslim Brotherhood taking over in Egypt, the backing away from 'terrorist' terminology, etc. and the actual war against the Catholic religion with Obamacare. He came out in support of the OWS crowd (the wealth group divide), He came out in support of Fluke (war on women group), and supported the 'throw granny over the cliff' crap (the age group).

He had no record when he first ran; gained a horrendous record when he did win the first four years......he had to divide the country in order to win a second time........and liberals are going to keep that legacy going now that he is back in office so that they can use the same weaponry in the next set of elections.

didn't dispute anything I said...........

Pulpit Day didn't happen, so what? That issue doesn't have anything to do with what I posted. But you didn't deny that BO deliberately since February set about completely dividing this country into groups in order to win rather than run on a failed record that he couldn't defend.

He will no longer be able to blame Bush for what he does now.......the last four years belong to him exclusively and if he doesn't get it fixed and soon (before the next elections in 2014), he will have nobody to blame anymore but himself and his policies.

didn't notice that the New Black Panthers were the ones who were never charged with voter intimidation by this Administration and by your own admission, >>>The original Black Panthers had nothing to do with Islam. That came later on in the late 80s with the New Black Panther party>>>

So you can kiss my grits for a change with your insults because I had it right and you are mistaken/wrong because I didn't get any of the posted information from Fox News......I got it from actual facts that is now common knowledge.

Now try to show me where else you think I am "incorrect about most"........

came long after I posted to you.........and yes, I am tired of constantly being insulted by members here in SE who don't agree with me. I have asked repeatedly to have those insults stop and have been not only ignored, but the insults have actually increased. I'm not taking it anymore and if you don't like it, too bad. Classy? I never claimed to be, even when I was a Moderator here. There is only so much of asking for civility from a worthless bunch of uncivil posters that I will keep doing. I've been back for about six months, and from the very first post, I was attacked by Zikks........and the others joined in in tandem. Every post I make is targeted on a personal level by at least four of you, and when you can't make an honest debate, you resort to insults. This is exactly the same tactic that every liberal will use and was used effectively by BO......when you don't have anything to stand on, resort to smears, insults, and assaults. Unlike Romney, I push back.

As for the Black Panthers, I know the history..........and the fact that Holder refused to allow the charges against the New Black Panthers that Bush's AG had already brought against them for voter intimidation to stand and actually dropped the charges was another example of BO and his administration embracing that religion publicly while at the same time attacking the Catholics.......another divide and conquer method. Please stay on topic and not try to make it seem I said something that I didn't or that I don't know what I'm talking about.

prove a point on EITHER side IS the point, isn't it? That doesn't give people in this forum the right to be able to attack, insult, and assault other members because the points don't agree. Maybe it's time for the OTHER side here to also realize that until the last day or so I have not only gone out of my way to be civil even when I totally disliked not only the message but the messenger and actually ASKED the other side to lay off the disparaging remarks they made to me. I'm not taking it anymore.

And yes......the entire plan of BO's the last two campaigns but mainly in this one WAS to divide and conquer. The strategy worked......however, since he had no record he could brag about.......not even Obamacare throughout his entire campaign, the ONLY way he could win was thru divisiveness and smear tactics. He laid out that entire strategy during his 2008 run and it's on video....."If you can't run on your record, you destroy the other side" (paraphrased by me). It may have been used before by Republicans but never as nasty and dirty as BO used it. No Republican ever accused their opponent of being a possible felon or that they killed someone.

a stalking PITA with nothing to say.

sorry if you didn't care for what I said. But unlike you, when I have nothing to say, I don't reply further or at all.

someone didn't reply to you? Do you think it's mandatory for people to reply?

OK, what are you not taking and what are you going to do about it? I don't understand. You sound so miserable as a person I am confused as to why you keep showing back up for more punches...........enlighten me. It has to be based on more than BO hatred..........

...old rich American Republican white Anglo-Saxon Protestant white men. Of course, old American Republican Catholic white men are considered honorary Protestants if they're rich and exploitative enough. What's more, old rich black, brown and yellow men in other places are considered honorary whites for purposes of business, payoffs, mutual corruption and economic imperialism. Even rich men in formerly godless Communist Russia can pass as honorary old rich white Christian Americans if they're rich enough, which usually means that they plundered state resources during the collapse of the Soviet government. In fact, once in a while even a woman can be an honorary man if she is greedy and venal enough - to wit, Imelda Marcos. (I still remember the time she said that a certain Filipino politician would not make a good president. When asked why not, she replied that the reason was because the man's wife would not make a good First Lady. When asked why not, she replied, "Because she's not pretty.")

hate and change.