Speakeasy forum: Has anyone been sent to revive Toni yet?

4 more years! 4 more years! Let the games continue!!!

four years of BO'S CHANGE we will be even further in the hole:( Hopefully after the first four maybe he has learned something, anything would be nice.

He'd have all the details on how it would work.

You call out my name but talk about Trump, Bachmann (who won) and Palin.

If your intention in your topic line is to supposedly 'rub my nose' in your win, it isn't going to work. I told you before, Josh, that if BO won, you would have to put up with four more years of my rants against him. I don't intend to back down from that because the guy is dangerous for our country and his policies are going to just about kill us.

Bask in your day or two of sunshine....Nov 17 is a hearing date for Benghazi.......perhaps we'll be looking at impeachment charges and he can join the ranks with Clinton since without him, BO wouldn't have had a chance in hell and you all know it. Fast and Furious is long overdue as well, doncha think?

This prez has a lot that his administration has to account for......the death of one, possibly two, border guards, an Ambassador, his aid, and two former SEALs. If you think the Reps are going to let those die away, you're as crazy as the rest of the idiots who voted BO back in.

in advance.........BO and his pillar of a leader of the State Department had tons of warnings since April, right up until the same day of the attacks and ignored them all or discredited those warnings to the point of not only pulling the needed security, but leaving the Ambassador and his aide there, causing their murders.

at least for a little while, but the State Dept was getting the emails and cables on a pretty regular basis, and if BO wasn't told that the consulate had been bombed twice (April and June), that the British Ambassador was attacked and they pulled everybody out in August, and that the Red Cross pulled out at the same time, then he's more out of touch with his own administration than he is with the people he pretends he cares about who not only voted for him but work for him since he's the one who personally appointed Stevens to that risky post and then didn't provide his protection because BO was trying to convince the world that Libya was 'normalized'.

The Administration and the Intel community are well aware of where Iran is, where they may be going and how long it would take them to get there. They're not going to wait until Iran has a nuke and then "react." Obama has stated this openly; in fact I think he mentioned it in one of the debates.

When most people think about a "nuke', they envision a technically complex device that is small enough to fit in a rocket,

Most maybe, but not everyone, there are movies and TV shows with THAT scenario.

Have you been watching "Homeland"?Obama has

In the latest episode the terrorists are removing a box the size of a footlocker from a false wall and the CIA, FBI are hot on their trail.

because one must be test detonated proving to the rest of the world that they have the ability

Thoughts

Would they have to do this BEFORE they built the second one?

Would they build 2 exactly the same and IF the first one works...they know/assume the second one will work (then they hide the second in a strategic location)...

OF Course ONCE they detonate the first (practice) device...world attention will REALLY be on them...in the form of physical retaliation.

BUT IF the first one doesn't work(and word gets out that they've built a nuclear device)...they have a DUD for the second. Back to the drawing board, IF they can find a drawing board.

But the price that will be paid won't just be my rants for four years.

that the Dems will finally be credible is when they ALSO start moving to the middle again and avoid having bills passed without even one Rep vote. You already had Reid making the statement before the election was held that if Romney won he wouldn't present any bills for a vote in the Senate, which is what he's been doing now for two years already.

And, in case you didn't know this, a Senate aide is a nobody when it comes to being an authority figure or a spox for either party. It's like talking to the janitor at Microsoft and expecting to hear expert information on programming strategy.

squeaked through with his re-election numbers, so a win is a win is a win, right?

nor does it stop some people from trying to make a win into some new high-fiving revolutionary statement. I'm not complaining about the win for BO itself.......I'm just prepared to keep complaining about his policies for the next four years.

I mainly find it disturbing that this is the first time in our history that a prez was re-elected with a record as horrendous as this one has and that his entire campaign was started and ended with a 'kill Romney' theme (Chicago tactics) and that it worked.

get those people killed on his watch. He didn't start off with the agenda a year ago to kill them but he left it up to his administration and himself to leave them in danger in order to reach his agenda of 'normalizing' Libya. His agenda starting from before the Primary presidential debates were started was that Romney would be the 'target' and the 'kill Romney' directive was already in place.