Speakeasy forum: Mr. President. Is this true?

I've heard of military people requesting ballots from back home and never getting them. We've seen incidences where military absentee ballots the Democrats have tried to toss out, and have tossed. Those which manage to make it back to the states, often go uncounted. Not all of it is the states' fault, and I personally would like to see them make it mandatory for soldiers to show they've ordered ballots from home, perhaps by having them dropped off at military headquarters where stationed and those delivered then by the headquarters to the various states. If they can make sure all military get their flu shots each year, they can also make sure they get ballots, by making it a requirement they file for them.

just the opposite it true since the OBL kill.......with all the government leaks coming out, the military are really PO'd at our 'leader' what with giving access to Hollywood for that movie, getting our informants killed or jailed by giving out enough details so that Pakistan and Yemen could ID them, ratting out the fly route for Israel to get to Iran, leaking that computer worm information, just NOW dropping all charges after four years of the CIA agents regarding interrogation methods after ruining their lives and careers, cutting the Pentagon budget so severely already with another huge cut on the brink coming knowing it's costing millions of jobs all over and not just with the military personnel who will be on unemployment lines, announcing to our enemies when we were leaving Iraq making everything we did there mean next to nothing and doing the same with Afghanistan (why wait....just bring them all home right now and save a bunch of lives), and now going after a SEAL for writing a book when there has been NO indication that he broke any confidentiality agreement according to military sources who have read it except the one or two who are under the BO glare to say what he wants them to say (you'll notice that the official statement given is that they "MIGHT" do something about it, not that they "WILL" so it's nothing but scare tactics which is what Chicago does routinely in order to bully somebody into submission). You'll also notice that it's months already with only a handful of people who COULD have leaked all that info, and the investigation is barely talked about now but 'still ongoing'....how long does it take to talk to maybe twenty people to find the source?. The military are also ticked off that it's two years now since Terry was killed on the border via Fast and Furious and THAT'S going nowhere fast, too.

...as Dick Cheney was.

NO indication that he broke any confidentiality agreement according to military sources who have read it except the one or two

NO indication EXCEPT for one or two?

HOW does THAT work?

A simple question that you should be able to answer without naming anyone, or calling anyone a puppet master.

North of the border one or two exceptions IS and indication. (at least in their mind)

How many exceptions do YOU want before something is an indication?

You think they are privy to new intelligence info, OR how events that happened a couple years ago can affect what is going on today?

Unless they get a daily briefing, they might as well ask me my opinion of the threat the book poses.