Not the whole story?
by MarkFlax
- 3/22/12 1:07 PM
In Reply to: Use Metro or else by TWB404
I read on beyond the headline.
"In Windows 8, the Metro interface (the new Start Screen and Metro apps) will have three different "zoom" levels: 100%, which represents a 11.6-inch 1366x768 (112 PPI) display; 140%, which represents a 11.6-inch 1920x1080 (190 PPI) full HD display; and 180%, which represents a 11.6-inch 2560x1440 (253 PPI) WQHD display. Almost every desktop monitor falls into the 100% category (a 27-inch 2560x1440 display is only 109 PPI), while many laptops and tablets will use the 140 and 180% zoom. The Building Windows 8 blog post doesn't mention the Desktop side of things at all, so it looks like it will be stuck with its current, crummy zoom controls."
"In effect, Windows 8 will be doing exactly what iOS has to do when scaling up original iPhone and iPad apps for the iPhone 4 or iPad 3 with a Retina display. There is one fairly sizable difference, though: With the Apple devices, because of the fixed aspect ratio and screen sizes, the image simply has to be doubled in size (scaled 200%). This is easy to do and has no risk of causing any graphical anomalies. Windows 8 doesn't have it so easy: If you scale a 32x32-pixel icon by 140%, you end up with 44.8x44.8 - which then has to be rounded up or down to 44 or 45. It's the same story for 180%."
{My highlight and underlining}
So I'm guessing, without having tried Windows 8 yet, that 'Desktop' users will see little difference unless they need to "Zoom" the display. What do you see with your tests?
Mark
Was this reply helpful? (0) (0)
Staff pick