Seemed quite relevant, actually. . . . :{
by kerijc - 9/28/12 5:49 PM
In Reply to: attn: kerijc by birdmantd
If it wasn't relevant, I wouldn't have posted in it. That's why I intentionally 'subject titled' my post: 'Seven months on.....?.' After 7-8 months of no discussion on the subject, it seems altogether relevant, imo, that the subject kicked around a bit again, especially since Apple is trying to get rid of huge supplies of 4's & 4S's, and AT&T (for one) just lowered their costs to 'Free' and '$99.' respectively.
Where in the 'forum rules' (since that's now being cited :rolleyes:) does it say that a discussion topic---can not be revisited at a later date---even though the discussion topic is still obviously relevant? Is that some kind of central pillar of the 'forum rules'? Does anyone actually take the time to read entirely through the forum rules?
Do you, birdmantd M, really have nothing better to do than to go around unnecessarily deleting other poster's posts??? :rolleyes: Is (that) what kind of forum this is??? :rolleyes:
Was this reply helpful? (0) (0)
Staff pick