Alert from CNET Staff

 Attention forum users:  We want you to try out the new CNET forums platform! Click here to read the details. Thanks!

Buzz Out Loud Lounge forum: IPv6 and NAT, a treatise

by: tylerlarson February 7, 2008 11:25 PM PST

Like this

0 people like this thread

Staff pick

IPv6 and NAT, a treatise

by tylerlarson - 2/7/08 11:25 PM

As explained in episode 655, IPv6 does, indeed, make NAT routers unnecessary as far as their original purpose is concerned. NAT is a bit of a hack that arose from the difficulty of reserving IP addresses in the limited IPv4 space, and has maintained a sort of "kludge" status among the designers of Internet protocols -- a hack they'd just as soon forget about. Protocols designed for IPv6 (such as IPSec) are decidedly unfriendly (and downright nonfunctional) in the face of NAT because it is intended and expected that NAT never be used on an IPv6 network. (Yes, really.)

Using a NAT router for security has become popular and recommended because it's nearly impossible to get wrong. This is because NAT "fails closed" -- which is to say, no inbound connections are possible without being explicitly permitted. This level of security is deeply associated with NAT, because at the time, you would never find a router without NAT set up in that configuration -- after all, who would want a device to NOT WORK by default? As everyone says, those were simpler times....

But while NAT forces security upon you, it isn't NECESSARY for security. The same "secure by default" configuration in easily available using a router without NAT, but which has similar firewall capability. Here are the basic technical ingredients:
1: Drop all inbound TCP connection attempts
2: Drop all inbound UDP packets unless an outbound packet has been recently seen with corresponding port numbers and IP addresses
3: Drop all non-UDP, non-TCP traffic
4: .... profit!
This is EXACTLY the same rules and mechanisms that a NAT router follows, but without the need to translate addresses. Obviously, an interface should also be provided to allow people to add additional exceptions, just like they can in NAT routers now. The advantage is that a lot of the sticky points associated with NAT routers go away -- things like Skype, VPNs, and gaming will just work better, and an entire class of messy, unreliable hacks will finally disappear.


Forum Icon Legend

  • UnreadUnread
  • ReadRead
  • Locked threadLocked thread
  • ModeratorModerator
  • CNET StaffCNET Staff
  • Samsung StaffSamsung Staff
  • Norton Authorized Support TeamNorton Authorized Support Team
  • AVG StaffAVG Staff
  • avast! Staffavast! Staff
  • Webroot Support TeamWebroot Support Team
  • Acer Customer Experience TeamAcer Customer Experience Team
  • Windows Outreach TeamWindows Outreach Team
  • DISH staffDISH staff
  • Dell StaffDell Staff
  • Intel StaffIntel Staff
  • QuestionQuestion
  • Resolved questionResolved question
  • General discussionGeneral discussion
  • TipTip
  • Alert or warningAlert or warning
  • PraisePraise
  • RantRant

You are e-mailing the following post: Post Subject

Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose.

Sorry, there was a problem emailing this post. Please try again.

Submit Email Cancel

Thank you. Sent email to


Thank you. Sent email to


You are reporting the following post: Post Subject

If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements or commercial links

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Sorry, there was a problem submitting your post. Please try again.

Submit Report Cancel

Your message has been submitted and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.


Your message has been submitted and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.


You are posting a reply to: Post Subject

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to the CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to CBS Interactive Site Terms of Use.

You are currently tracking this discussion. Click here to manage your tracked discussions.

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

Sorry, there was a problem submitting your post. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem generating the preview. Please try again.

Duplicate posts are not allowed in the forums. Please edit your post and submit again.

Submit Reply Preview Cancel

Thank you, , your post has been submitted and will appear on our site shortly.