<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>CNET Forums: Message List - Raw or JPEG</title>
    <link>http://forums.cnet.com/</link>
    <description>The latest posts in Raw or JPEG.</description>
    
    <category>CNET.com</category>
    <generator>CNET</generator>
    <docs>http://www.cnet.com</docs>


    <item>
      <title>Somehow, I don&apos;t think companies like Adobe, Canon, etc</title>
      <description>are directing their efforts at &apos;tinkerers&apos;. I think the effort is for &lt;b&gt;photographers&lt;/b&gt;. The people who are serious a ...</description>
      <link>http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-539034.html</link>
      <guid isPermalink="true">http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-539034.html</guid>      
      <pubDate>13 Nov 2004 08:17:21 PST</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>RAW is for tinkerers...</title>
      <description>Thre are those people for who the photography part of their digital camera is unimportant and who like to tinker with th ...</description>
      <link>http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-538874.html</link>
      <guid isPermalink="true">http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-538874.html</guid>      
      <pubDate>13 Nov 2004 07:12:39 PST</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>I&apos;ve read that the main advantage of raw files is the</title>
      <description>ability to apply your own &apos;processing rules&apos; rather than be dependent on the camera&apos;s internal processor-program. Thus, ...</description>
      <link>http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-531747.html</link>
      <guid isPermalink="true">http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-531747.html</guid>      
      <pubDate>10 Nov 2004 07:13:39 PST</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Raw or JPEG</title>
      <description>It is true that JPEG is a compressed fomrat and thus original &amp;quot;raw&amp;quot; data is lost.  But a high-resolution JPEG ...</description>
      <link>http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-531249.html</link>
      <guid isPermalink="true">http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-531249.html</guid>      
      <pubDate>09 Nov 2004 21:08:50 PST</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Raw or JPEG</title>
      <description>Well simply put RAW is the file right off the camera chip.  No real file formatting has gone on.  Unlike a JPEG that can ...</description>
      <link>http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-425242.html</link>
      <guid isPermalink="true">http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7593_102-425242.html</guid>      
      <pubDate>11 Sep 2004 12:39:47 PDT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>