Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: Sony, Nintendo, Apple sued over wireless
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Windows XP: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk?

by dromel - 1/19/05 1:06 PM
advertisement
Click Here
Post 121 of 231

Perfect Disk...

by stonehkm - 1/29/05 1:27 PM In reply to: PefectDisk by Nothingboy

is very slow! Diskeper 9.0 is ultra fast, does not hog resources and runs in the background. Or you can try the free version (Diskeeper Lite) that you manually start to try it first. URL:
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dkeeperlite.html

Post 122 of 231

As mentioned earlier in the thread...

by BumFluff - 10/15/05 12:23 PM In reply to: Perfect Disk... by stonehkm

the first time you use Perfect Disk will be slow. Subsequent uses will be sped up. And it also runs in the background.

I persdonally enjoy Norton Products though I have never used Norton Systemworks. Perfect Disk keeps me happy with what it does.

Post 123 of 231

diskeeper

by jazzmo2001 - 1/21/05 6:07 PM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

I like Diskeeper that is what i use and it has a lot of good features you can set it and 4get it it wil run on its own...

Post 124 of 231

Yup, Diskeeper

by 40;) - 1/21/05 6:42 PM In reply to: diskeeper by jazzmo2001

Add one more vote for Diskeeper (9.0). It works fast, it works well, and it doesn't choke your system while it's running. So I can read posts and defrag at the same time. I suggest it to all my clients.
PS: Good people too - they answer questions and really seem to care, both before and after you purchase. (Try THAT with Norton, etc!)

Post 125 of 231

Defrag

by iharrison - 1/21/05 6:42 PM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

The best in my opinion is neither of those but Diskkeeper from Execsoft. It runs in the background and has never let me down or caused a crash in the 3 years I have had it running.

Post 126 of 231

Win XP Defrag or Norton Speed Disk

by beedubs - 1/21/05 8:11 PM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

When I used Win 98, Speed Disk did a great job, but it's less effective on XP than Win XP Defrag.

Post 127 of 231

Norton Speed Disk & Antivirus also.

by ChookNZ - 1/22/05 2:42 AM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

Norton chews up mucho grosso system resources & noticably slows down even very fast systems. Better off to use the standard windows defrag, or the one included with System Mechanic works really well. Norton is the pits. So is their antivirus. Grisoft does a better job & is FREE.

Post 128 of 231

What is the ...

by Papa Echo - 1/22/05 4:30 AM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

...difference between "efficient" and "more efficient" ? For most people, it's only the $$. WinXP defrag does not cost extra $$.

Post 129 of 231

Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk?

by cguard - 1/22/05 6:57 AM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

Neither. I'm still an old faithful Windows 98 2nd Ed. user. I highly recommend you buying Diskeeper. It defrags the hard drive very fast. The programs start very fast. I believe that using the Windows or Norton Defrag System takes a long time to defrag. Using them will lead to wear and tear of the hard drive a little at a time.

Post 130 of 231

Diskeeper

by frodermann - 1/22/05 9:09 AM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

I believe Diskeeper from executive software is the full version of the xp defragger and it is the one that I use and am satisfied with.

Post 131 of 231

Stick with the topic

by fchin50 - 1/22/05 9:26 AM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

I prefer speed disk but it is horribly slow. It does a preety good job of defraging your hard drive. Other replies to the question should stick with the question and not digress.

Post 132 of 231

Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk?

by cherokeebo - 1/22/05 1:05 PM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

I have used the Windows defragger and have had to shut off the wallpaper, power control and screen saver. 40 Gb disk took almost three hours.
Running Diskeeper it took about an hour and half. I did not buy it because I have Norton Systems Works with Speed Disk and Disk Doctor. I could not run Speed Disk when I had the Diskeeper loaded
Nortons defragger will run with the screensaver and other background stuff running. The more often I run it the faster it becomes. I do this at least once a week so it finishes in about 30 minutes.

Post 133 of 231

Norton vs Diskeeper

by surfingdave - 1/22/05 1:06 PM In reply to: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk? by dromel

I have both Norton and Diskeeper and the only difference I have found is that Norton can move all your files into one continuous block, but diskeeper can leave them spread around the disk. Also Norton has caused my PC to crash when used.
I used to have Norton AV but it slowed my PC to a crawl on bootup.

Post 134 of 231

try boot up defrag with diskeeper

by skippyd333 - 1/22/05 1:18 PM In reply to: Norton vs Diskeeper by surfingdave

it puts the disk together

Post 135 of 231

what do use then instead Norton AV?

by Svyato - 1/24/05 9:09 AM In reply to: Norton vs Diskeeper by surfingdave

what do use then instead Norton AV?
thank you

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software