Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

PC hardware: WD40??????????

by halvaro - 9/22/04 4:05 PM
advertisement
Post 46 of 175

Re: WD40??????????

by Lloyd K - 11/26/04 5:57 AM In reply to: Re: WD40?????????? by Willy

Caution if you are a shooter, do not allow WD 40 to come in contact with your cartridge primers. It's penetrating ability has been known to cause primers to fail or misfire. Either could be very dangerous. I have used WD 40 for many years on my hunting arms and am careful that any excess is wiped off and that the ammunition does not come in contact with the solvents in WD 40.

Post 47 of 175

Re: WD40??caution

by gthurman - 11/26/04 6:18 AM In reply to: Re: WD40?????????? by Willy

When WD-40 appeared in the early '70s, we thought it would be great for drive motor lubrication of computer tape drives. It was for a few days. Then the shafts seized. What remained after the volitale agents were evaporated was approximately 70 weight oil according to our lab. I always judge if what I want to spray, over a long term, can tolerate 70 weight oil.

Post 48 of 175

WD40...history link

by Willy - 9/24/04 8:10 PM In reply to: Re: WD40?????????? by reipph

http://www.wd40.com/AboutUs/our_history.html

In conjunction with my earlier post and this link should explain things far better than I from memory.

Hope this helps -----Willy :)

Post 49 of 175

Re: WD40...history link

by reipph - 9/25/04 3:11 PM In reply to: WD40...history link by Willy

Got your point. You are absolutely correct. Thanks!

Post 50 of 175

Where would I be without my Duct Tape, Hay Baling Wire,

by John Robie - 9/25/04 3:25 PM In reply to: WD40...history link by Willy

Liquid Wrench, and WD-40.

A absolute honest true story:

Years ago when I had a 1940's era auto, the right front tire rod (ball socket connected to steering of right front wheel) fell off dragging on the ground. Came to a halt as just couldn't steer properly with one wheel. Well, fished around in the trunk and found a coathanger. Mind you now, this was before Duct Tape was invented. Used the coathanger to wrap around and hold the socket in long enough to drive 20 miles home then next day 20 miles back into town to the auto dealer to get replaced. The mechanic could hardly believe I could have made it with that coathanger. Even today, I always have a coathanger and Duct Tape in my trunk.

JR

Post 51 of 175

Re: WD40...history link WarningAbout Plastics.

by cmpenchina - 11/26/04 1:04 PM In reply to: WD40...history link by Willy

Works great as water displacer and as long term lube.
They used to (maybe still do) sell it much cheaper (per unit cost) in gallons. They also sell a refillable hand operated sprayer (at high cost) so I used leftover sprayers from household cleaners. They worked well for only about a day or two. The company tech support explained that WD40 causes plastic parts to swell, and kills the spraying action. they had to make a very special sprayer to work with WD40.

So be careful when using around plastics. The effect may not be good.(They don't seem to supply this warning).

Post 52 of 175

Aww....come on now tell us

by John Robie - 9/25/04 3:13 PM In reply to: Re: WD40?????????? by reipph

what brand name is approved by NASA and better than WD-40. You won't be spamming or advertising unless you are employed by the company and then that will be debatable used in the context of this discussion.

I have heard and could it be a product from the X-IR corporation that produces also a gun lub/cleaner, or the VCI Vapor corrosion inhibitor with their numerour spray types labeled NOX-RUST, or perhaps Bullfrog (Bullrog) Rust Blocker approved by the Navy and used by the Military and NASA?

Please tell us.

Post 53 of 175

Re: Aww....come on now tell us

by reipph - 9/27/04 10:13 AM In reply to: Aww....come on now tell us by John Robie

Can't remember the brand, just saw it in TV shopping, I will tell you when I see it again, could be X-1R's, didn't try it though, as I said, they claim to be better than any lubricating brand in the market, but a claim is a claim and an advertisement is an advertisement. I am still using WD40 though and they had been used by NASA too. There are many new lubricant brands being advertised now, even X-1R's is a new product (correct me if i am wrong) and history will judge for their effectiveness. LOL.

Post 54 of 175

Re: Aww....come on now tell us

by BABatson - 10/1/04 9:02 PM In reply to: Re: Aww....come on now tell us by reipph

Here in Central Oregon, 'TRI-FLOW -- Superior Lubricant' is the favourite. It is made by Sherwin-Williams Company, Cleveland, Ohio 44115. WD-40 tends to wear-off, it seems to me, and I really like TRI-FLOW. However, it ought not to be applied to the body or inhaled overmuch; I do not know if WD-40, which has been popular at least 35 years, is more body-friendly, and I never heard of using it for arthritis -- it does contain liquid silicon lubricant.

Post 55 of 175

Re: WD40 composition

by techuser - 10/2/04 3:31 AM In reply to: Re: Aww....come on now tell us by BABatson

You bunch of knuckleheads!! I read a little more than half of the replies. Nice history lessons and mode of action and applications, but nothing about the composition that answers the question "what is WD40..."

Give this a read:

Newsgroups: sci.chem
Subject: Re: WD 40 Ingredients
From: B.Hamilton@irl.cri.nz (Bruce Hamilton)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:18:38 +12

Well, I'll be a little crass and add to my post.

In article <...> B.Hamilton@irl.cri.nz (Bruce Hamilton) writes:
>The WD stands for Water Displacing. I haven't analysed it,( not commonly sold here ) but somebody (Professor Toraki? )squirted some down a GC/MS and confirmed the solvent was boiling around 150-200C and only contained a minor % of aromatics, which means it is either a narrow boiling range kerosine fraction, or a special narrow boiling range solvent like low aromatics white spirits.

It is listed as Stoddard Solvent - which is actually a low aromatics White Spirit. It would have a boiling range between 150C - 200C and an aromatics content below 20%. According to various sources, the typical liquid product contains:-

70% low aromatic white spirits ( stoddard solvent )
~20% lubricant base grade ( solvent de-waxed, paraffinic type )
10% of corrosion inhibitor ( some formulations use 2 inhibitors, normally they would only be present at low concentrations, so it's possible that the inhibitor could be something crude like an oil that produces a hard film with synthetic additives )
5% of wetting agent ( probably quite low concentration, other the formulation would emulsify some water which could affect theprotective film's durability and performance )
<5% of fragrance.

The aerosol versions adds 25% of LPG as propellant to the above( probably with less of the wetting agent to minimise foam )

My earlier suggestions aren't too different from the above.

Bruce Hamilton
=============================

Post 56 of 175

Re: WD40 composition

by Scargill - 11/26/04 1:08 AM In reply to: Re: WD40 composition by techuser

Here in UK I use WD40 at work, & we need to recieve a product Data sheet with an order.
It stated it was composed of Oil & White spirit.
There is certainly more, as you state, Bruce, as you can smell the perfume, and the wetting agent is probably soap. (these would not need to be stated.)
You could make, very simply, a good substitute at home, out of things in the workshop. When I worked as a Radio & T/V repair man, we used to make it in this fashion if we ran out of switch cleaner. (Remember this?)In fact to reduce the risk of corrosion a lot if items, (Soft greases oils etc) were mixed with parrafin substances, as when they were painted on the surface, the solvent dried out, leaving the greasy coating to exclude the air, so preserving it. That said, Its very handy in aerosol form. I bought a second hand gas cooker of a lady that had altered the kitchen so it didnt fit. She picked up a can to spray & clean the grease of it before I took it! Handy stuff
Mike Scargill (UK)

Post 57 of 175

Reply to an old posting

by laurieprior - 9/8/08 4:14 AM In reply to: Re: WD40 composition by Scargill

WD 40 doesn't contain what you'd think of as oil.
Also in the UK I did some background study of WD 40 before using it in damp sticky piano mechanisms.

I had a letter from the manufacturers of the patented product when they were owned by Cadulac Chemicals in the 1970s They informed me that the product contained
Animal Waxes (that is Tallow)
Petroleum based waxes (rather like Vaseline)
All borne up in a 3 to 1 concentration of White Spirit.
This is like a turpentine substitute.

The turps does most of the Surfactant work displacing water and the waxes do the lubrication.

It was safe to use in Piano actions, on wood, cloth and brass pivot pins and didn't dissolve any of the old fashioned Scotch Glue, or Animal Glue.
The company said I should be careful to make sure I didn't use it on any Cold-moulded plastics and there aren't any of those used even in modern pianos.
The lubricant was used to free up sticky components that the wooden parts had swollen with moist air or damp conditions. It was very effective and had no long term side effects.

So I just thought I'd put in my two penny worth to let you know it doesn't contain oil. Or at least it didn't when the inventors started making it.
I think the US Navy invented it and they had 40 attempts at the right formula hence Water Displacer 40
Hope that doesn't all sound smug but I thought the record needed straightening.

Post 58 of 175

Re: WD40 composition

by papgas - 11/26/04 3:27 PM In reply to: Re: WD40 composition by techuser

Too fuss for nothing you knucklehead!

Just => @ http://www.globalstoresgroup.com/page/industrial-supplies/ctgy/lubricants-and-oils
and then click on MSDS WD40

Post 59 of 175

Especially for YOU "techuser"

by papgas - 11/26/04 3:38 PM In reply to: Re: WD40 composition by techuser

Too fuss for nothing you knucklehead!

Just => @ http://www.globalstoresgroup.com/page/industrial-supplies/ctgy/lubricants-and-oils
and then click on MSDS WD40

Post 60 of 175

Re: WD40??????????

by Zia - 10/1/04 1:23 AM In reply to: Re: WD40?????????? by Willy

It stands for Water Displacement - 40 th attempt.

That's the name straight out of the lab book used by the chemist who developed WD-40 back in 1953. The chemist, Norm Larsen, was attempting to concoct a formula to prevent corrosion -- a task which is done by displacing water. Norm's persistence paid off when he perfected the formula on his 40th try.

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software