Go to Windows 7 Insider Guide
Speakeasy: World Net Daily asserts (falsely) that Ft. Hood gunman
Obviously the statement was not correct in it's entirety
by JP Bill - 11/8/09 1:23 PM In reply to: correcting by James DenisonShe's not entirely pregnant?
If it ain't
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
It's a lie.
Obviously the statement was not correct...
by EdHannigan - 11/8/09 2:51 PM In reply to: correcting by James Denisonin any way.
There was no assertion that Hasan was part of the transition team.
That's all.
I wonder if bookies
by Angeline Booher
- 11/7/09 5:36 AM
In reply to: World Net Daily asserts (falsely) that Ft. Hood gunman by Ziks511
...... were taking bets on how long it would take for somebody to use the tragedy to associate Obama with the shooter.
I would have bet less than 24 hours. Looks like it was quicker than that.
Angeline
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email
semods4@yahoo.com
they didn't associate him with Obama.
by James Denison - 11/7/09 5:42 AM In reply to: I wonder if bookies by Angeline Booher
The Obama Transition team associated him with them. If there was no association, then none would have been noted. Are you against evidentiary material?
PS - CNET spellcheck doesn't know the word "evidentiary".
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evidentiary
PPS
by James Denison - 11/7/09 5:43 AM In reply to: they didn't associate him with Obama. by James DenisonThe CNET spell check also doesn't know "CNET" or "OBAMA".
Tell us more
by MarkFlax - 11/7/09 5:56 AM
In reply to: PPS by James Denison
CNET doesn't have a spell check as such as far as I know, just a filter for the forums to remove certain words added to a prohibited list.
Is that what you mean?
I use Firefox and its spellcheck add-on recognises both CNET and Obama. (Well, it does now, I have just had to right click each of those words in this typing and select, "Add to dictionary"!)
Mark
thanks
by James Denison - 11/7/09 8:47 AM In reply to: Tell us more by MarkFlax
It is firefox.
Are you against evidentiary material?
by EdHannigan - 11/7/09 5:48 AM In reply to: they didn't associate him with Obama. by James DenisonApparently, yes, when it doesn't fit with prejudices.
(NT) You might have meant "bias" rather than "prejudice"
by Angeline Booher - 11/7/09 8:22 AM
In reply to: Are you against evidentiary material? by EdHannigan
Nope
by EdHannigan - 11/7/09 8:57 AM In reply to: (NT) You might have meant "bias" rather than "prejudice" by Angeline Booher
When someone has their mind made up in advance about something that is prejudice.
Note who made the first post...
by EdHannigan - 11/7/09 5:46 AM In reply to: I wonder if bookies by Angeline Booher
We can report facts or ignore them. No one made it up, did they? No one is "using" the tragedy.
As well with my bookie,
by Mike_Hanks - 11/7/09 6:43 AM In reply to: I wonder if bookies by Angeline Booher
I had the over under of milliseconds as to how long it would take the media to disconnect this guy from "Muslim"
would take the media to disconnect this guy from "Muslim"
by JP Bill - 11/7/09 7:30 AM In reply to: As well with my bookie, by Mike_HanksLonger than it takes to connect him with 'Muslim"?
Here's one connecting him with everyONE/everything.
Mass Murdering Muslim Major Worked to Assist Obama Transition Team Through University Project
They left out whether he was "Right handed/Left handed or Ambidextrous".
(NT) broken link
by James Denison - 11/7/09 8:50 AM In reply to: would take the media to disconnect this guy from "Muslim" by JP BillWhy should a muslim be disconnected
by Angeline Booher - 11/7/09 8:18 AM
In reply to: As well with my bookie, by Mike_Hanks
..... from "muslim"?
Surely not everybody automatically associates "muslim" with "terrorist".
Angeline
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email
semods4@yahoo.com
| Forum legend: | |
 |
Locked thread |
 |
Moderator |
 |
CNET staff |
 |
Samsung staff |
 |
Norton Authorized Support team |
 |
AVG staff |
 |
Windows Outreach team |
 |
Dell staff |
 |
Intel staff |
