When I was with Comcast I ran a small webserver at home, no problems. I've switched to AT&T DSL and now that appears to not be possible. When I go to my public IP address I just see a screen from AT&T, not my home server.
Is there some trick to making it work? If not, I'll just switch back to Comcast.
Thanks,
Chris
They allow it if you get the right service. I found that many ISPs block servers are don't allow on the cheap home user accounts.
I agree, it appears that they are steering me towards their business class DSL. I only switched to AT&T because 1) I was moving and 2) it was cheaper. If I have to go to the business class DSL it will no longer be cheaper. I now have an appointment to get Comcast installed at the new place, with a "special" 12 month price.
Thanks!
They had deals that you have to ask about. Did you see Comcast's quarterly results?
block port 80.
You can get around it by picking another port and giving it an IP address of:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:81
Set your router to this port DMZ.
Don't ask me how I know.
Most ISP's do not allow you to serve pages from your home computer because it hogs bandwidth from other customers. AT&T explicitly states so in their "Terms of Service", "AT&T Legal Policy", and "AT&T Acceptable Use Policy" pages:
"You may not use your Service connection to host a dedicated Internet server site."
"Prohibited Activities
General Prohibitions: AT&T prohibits use of the IP Services in any way that is unlawful, harmful to or <B>interferes with use of AT&T's network or systems, or the network of any other provider, interferes with the use or enjoyment of services received by others</B>, infringes intellectual property rights, results in the publication of threatening or offensive material, or constitutes Spam/E-mail/Usenet abuse, a security risk or a violation of privacy."
These pages located at http://worldnet.att.net/general-info/terms-dsl-data.html and http://www.corp.att.com/aup/
You are just lucky that Comcast did not pull your plug for violations of its terms of service. AT&T must be taking pre-emptive, rather than reactive, measures to eliminate these violations.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |