Version: 2008
  • On ZDNet: Why Linux isn't enough
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Spyware, viruses, & security : Bat to Exe-- virus?

by summerian - 8/28/07 5:19 PM
Post 16 of 21

Bat to Exe Converter

by jackyc973 - 1/2/08 11:28 AM In reply to: "packers are needed to compile batch files." by R. Proffitt Moderator

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse/report16.pdf

This is a very nice article. Scan on Bat to Exe Converter is identified as false positive. I love to hear that. But I still have no clue why EXE file compiled with Bat to Exe Converter need to generate a XX.tmp file to run and that XX.tmp sitting there in the process even the compiled EXE file is finished running in a few seconds. What is XX.tmp doing? Or may be doing nothing. I will keep monitor the network packets and put on firewalls see if it sents out information. It's good to play safe than to regret. If I find anything, I will keep you guys posted. Thanks.

Post 17 of 21

1.4 vs 1.5

by rdunn - 7/5/09 4:54 PM In reply to: Bat to Exe Converter by jackyc973

Well... I have to say version 1.4 works fine on my Vista notebook... but v1.5 gives me the annoying 'side-by-side configuration is incorrect' error. So, for now, I'll stick with 1.4... because hunting down that side-by-side business is to much hassle.

Post 18 of 21

correction

by rdunn - 7/5/09 5:12 PM In reply to: 1.4 vs 1.5 by rdunn

Never mind... bad unzipper. 1.5 works now

(isn't there an edit/delete post?)

Post 19 of 21

That answer in the Feedback forum.

by R. Proffitt Moderator - 7/5/09 6:52 PM In reply to: correction by rdunn

It's why we have a preview button. This way you can read it before you commit it.

Note: Due to the depth of this discussion thread, no additional replies can be accepted for this post. If you have comments to make, please reply to the original post at the beginning of this thread.
Post 20 of 21

Not pertinent

by rdunn - 7/5/09 7:05 PM In reply to: correction by rdunn

Previewing would not help the fact that I found out afterward that the problem was my unzipping program... and then returning later, I had no option but to post again for correction.

If I could edit or delete, then I'd have done so.

Sorry, but suggesting that Preview is the answer to my query is a bit of a boilerplate and patronizing response.

good day

Note: Due to the depth of this discussion thread, no additional replies can be accepted for this post. If you have comments to make, please reply to the original post at the beginning of this thread.
Post 21 of 21

Pertinent.

by R. Proffitt Moderator - 7/5/09 8:41 PM In reply to: correction by rdunn

Why is answered. You can read the answer if you wish.

In short, if you need a delete, just ask and any moderator will do that for you. Editing is in the answer in the feedback forum.
Bob

Note: Due to the depth of this discussion thread, no additional replies can be accepted for this post. If you have comments to make, please reply to the original post at the beginning of this thread.
Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software