I haven't heard of anyone else having ANY lockup problems under the official Beta build 7000 so either you are running an earlie or doctored build or you simpl have a hardware problem you arent aware of. Just thought you should know since the errors you are stating are almost always hardare related you might want to check there first as it is definately not related to the OS.
Sorry it's so long, but I made it a point to try to answer all of your questions.
MY THOUGHTS:
After being fed up with various Vista-related issues with my Asus G1sn (a notebook computer), I decided to install a MSDNAA (One of Microsoft's deals with university students) copy of Windows XP. While there, I noticed they also had Windows 7 (this was after the final download date on the normal beta).
Though I haven't done any actual speed benchmarking (even if I felt like wasting time on it, the EULA says no benchmarking), I must say that W7 seems much faster than XP and Vista. It boots faster, wakes up faster, shuts down faster, transfers files faster, and finds a WIFI connection faster.
It also has much less annoying notifications than XP and Vista. In XP, I am constantly being bombarded with info balloons telling me things that likely don't even matter at the time (like my WI-FI signal when I'm doing offline work), but W7 manages to consolidate most notification-area popups into a single item, allowing you to choose when to read them. W7 also has much less UAC obstructions than Vista does. However, W7 likes to default secondary HDDs to read-only, but that can be fixed by editing its properties.
In terms of drivers, I found W7 to be very easy. ASUS doesn't like to provide notebook drivers for much other than the preloaded OS. I spent a long time looking for all my drivers to use on XP, and never could get my NVIDIA ones to work on Linux. All but my Realtek soundcard drivers installed without a hitch. The sound issue was fixed by running its installer in compatibility mode for Vista, and the sound works fine.
MicroTrend office client antivirus works well on W7, and I have heard that Avast does, too.
FEATURES:
W7 has the Start menu searchbar, which I liked from Vista. It has a wider taskbar for those of you who can't see well. QuickLaunch and the window selector on the taskbar were integrated in an interesting way. IE8 is sluggish and incompatible with many websites as expected, but FF3 works on W7. Wordpad had a facelift and looks kind of like MS Word 2007 by using the Ribbon interface (which, although I didn't like at first, I find to be more intuitive now) and supports OOF and OOXML formats. Paint also looks fancier and more useful, also adding the Ribbon. However, I prefer Paint.Net (available on CNET, I believe). "Shut Down" is the default shutdown option now (go figure). The sidebar isn't restricted to a bar (or the side) anymore. There's a "Show desktop" button, for those of you who don't like using the Windows+D hotkey. Many more features than I feel like listing.
SYSTEM REQs:
If you can run Vista, W7 should be no problem. I find it generally uses half the resources (especially RAM) of what Vista took. I don't recall actually reading Microsoft's recommended specs for W7, but I think they are lower for W7 than for Vista. It definitely seems to run more smoothly.
UPGRADE:
I won't be upgrading to W7 when it's released. I find it to be a nice piece of software, but unless I can get it cheap as a student, I will stick with XP (and maybe reinstall Vista if I absolutely must). I probably won't get it unless it comes prepackaged with something or really cheap. Since I just bought my notebook last year, I don't think I'll get W7 as a prepackaged deal for a few years.
Just wanted you to know that the Windows 7 is an improvement over Vista (I use Vista Business). It seems to work more intuitively, a tad faster (but only on some MS Apps), and really smokes over a broadband connection.
It is quite a bit faster than Windows XP (I have Windows XP Professional and XP Home). The biggest advantage over XP is Processing Speed. It renders everything (anything from Photoshop to Excel to Web pages) very quickly. No More Waiting.
However, you know that Windows 7 and Vista drive everything through the RAM and cache, making the speed improvements over XP quite dramatic. Also, Windows 7 is designed for multiple processors, 4 or more Gigs of RAM, 256 or larger Video cards,etc. and should not be used on older equipment. So if you're trying to use it in place of a single processor PC (2G or slower) and not much RAM, stick with XP or a 'crippled' Vista and save your money for your next machine.
I have installed Win7 on 8 systems at home an many more at work and so far the oldest sytem I installed it on(a P3 1Ghz wioth 512 ram) not only ran faster than vista but it had fewer issues than either of the previous OS's.
Hello E.B.
Windows 7 has been here for a long time, I have been using it for a long time and have never found any problems with it, it is also automatically updated.
Did you mean Window 8 perhaps ?
On that, I have no information.
Cheers and happy surfing
Franciscusaswell
"For those who beta tested Windows 7 and/or are still currently running Windows 7, what is your opinion on Windows 7?" I like it - it took many people a pretty sharp learning curve to get familiar with VISTA, but change is good. Because Win7 is built on the VISTA "core" - I'm forecasting that people who enjoyed VISTA will enjoy its bigger brother, Win7, even more.
"Is it really better than Vista or worse?" We really don't know what the RTM Win7 "is" yet. If history is any guide, we can bet that Redmond will be consistent - the various "public BETA" builds ironically do not prepare us for RTM release.
"If better, how so?" Microsoft will continue protecting us from ourselves, but to a less onerous extent than VISTA did with UAC.
"Are there more features?" No - Win7 will call a few things different names a bit but no, there are no substantive new features. Win7 is Microsoft's effort to get "corporate America" to accept VISTA. The bottom line remains that to run Win7 you can be certain you will need precisely the same / similar sort of hardware upgrades that VISTA required of us.
"My current system is running Windows Vista, will I have to upgrade my hardware again to run 7?" If you're running any edition beside VISTA Basic Edition, the answer is no. We don't know yet how many Win7 Editions Microsoft will release on the world markets.
"Will you be upgrading to Windows 7 when it is released?" No. I'll wait 6 to 9 months post-release to see how the RTM version is accepted by the Corporate / Enterprise market. When that segment green lights it, I'll upgrade. It is wholly possible they won't green light it for the same reason they didn't green light VISTA - the cost of hardware upgrades. But I'm doubting that'll be as much of an issue with hardware prices having crashed in the past 18 months.
Please enlighten me on anything you can for me and others who are curious and anticipating this new OS release. Thank for all your opinions and insights to these questions.
I have been running "7" on an old AMD 2G single core with 1G ram for a few months now. I have this machine in the living room and let anyone who wants use it, even if they know nothing about computers. So far nobody has been able to crash it yet. It has run all of my XP programs without fail, except Norton 360. Norton fixed that problem in a few minute chat with a rep.
The only other problem I have had is that when I let the mach. go to sleep it turns off my sound card and won't turn it back on without a reboot. I think that may be my sound card or a setting causing that.
I have not run Vista. I have used it and played around with the features on it but I have not used it to run my programs even though I think it is OK if you don't have any incompatible programs in your Favorites. I have several programs that simply never would run on Vista and the developers never seemed to want to fix them so I keep my trusty XP all the time.
As said before, "7" has run all of those programs without problems and it also has a very Vista looking interface.
I will probably upgrade to "7" on all of my computers when it comes out if it is not too expensive.
Jerry Beatty
Vista vs Windows 7, I like both, I beta tested Vista & now, I'm beta testing Windows 7. If you can use Vista, you will surely, be comfortable to use Windows 7, then again, there is always the learning curve. If your PC hardware is capable or good to run Vista, you will be able to run Windows 7. Windows 7 is nice, but I have had problems surfing, due to IE8 & old websites, that is a learning experience of the compatibility function of IE8.
Whatever (OS) operating system (Linux, Unix, OS X, XP, Vista, Windows 7)you have to learn the particulars of that OS, most people do not like change, when it comes to OS.
I am currently running Windows 7 Build 7077 and I can honestly say that I would not be happy to go back to Windows Vista--and I was one of those users that NEVER had a problem with Vista. It is significantly different in terms of performance and UI. It's just a beautiful OS that fixes old limitations (e.g., you no longer need a sidebar to have gadgets open) and adds functionality that people have been looking forward to for a long time (e.g., the ability to rearrange items on the taskbar and notification area; hide icons in the notification area)
With respect to the new features and UI, it would be best to see them for yourself. Most notable are "jump-lists," "peek windows," "libraries," "auto-window resizing," and "touch-support," IMO.
It is significantly better than Vista in that it offers a superior experience than Vista but demands less from your hardware. I have a netbook that came pre-loaded and optimized with Windows XP Home; I installed Windows 7 Ultimate and it boots up faster and runs faster and smoother than Windows XP.
You will not have to upgrade your hardware again to run Windows 7. They have made it more efficient and it is running off the Vista kernel anyways, so anything that works with Vista should work with 7.
I own a copy of Windows Vista Ultimate and will definitely be getting Windows 7 when it is released. I just hope that I will be able to afford it... perhaps Microsoft will be offering Vista owners incentives for upgrading their OS? One can only hope.
Whenever I have bought a machine with Vista already on it, I would run it for a while and then convert it back to XP Pro because performance was so bad. And I've even built a couple of machines more recently to be Vista machines and converted them back also. But once I got the Win 7 beta running, I have used and kept it because it is a great OS. I even had an older tablet laptop that I converted to a Win 7 machine and it runs like a charm. As soon as the final OS comes out, I will convert all of my XP Pro machines (except 1, I'm not stupid) to Win 7!
I have just installed it last nite and i am going over to it as soon as it is out, boots faster, new version of Windows Media (better by a bit) since last nite is has not crashed burning cds is easier and more reliable windows explorer is great. In short you dont need any additional H/W to run it, it should be an easy transition, windows 7 will be the end of Vista
Andre ![]()
If you're looking for a brand new experience you might be disappointed, but for many of us it is a relief.
Too many times Microsoft has redone the entire user and administrator experience which can create great frustration as you relearn how everything works. This is not the case here. The kernel is tighter and better designed so it's smaller than Vista and faster. The tools are a bit less intrusive, including the User Permissions. The gadgets aren't tied to the right edge and can be done one at a time. However it looks like an improved Vista using the same drivers (what a relief) and a similar interface and user experience.
The overall impression from the Beta Release 7000 is that I was looking at a much improved Vista - a Vista Version 2.
I've used Windows 7 beta for probably 6 weeks now and find it is superior to Vista. Not as slow however you will still have the hurdles of older apps functioning on Windows 7 the same as you did on Vista. Upgrading many of your apps will be required. You should not have to upgrade your hardware if you're already on Vista. Comparing speeds Windows 7 is definitely an improvement over Vista but then again Vista is a snail.
If it's not broke don't upgrade . Except most of like to be up to date right? There's Pro's & Con's from everyone like the guy that said installed Win7 and it's running great no probs but then there's me installed on 2 machine's both totally different 1's AMDx2 64bit 2x2.8 ghz the other Intel Pen4 3.0 ghz lucky for me i build computers all day . Because they have so many probs with Win 7 i spend more time hanging & waiting for windows to respond and rebooting then anything. Yeah it looks pretty if your not computing and not doing anything like surfing the net . Yeah it comes with nice colorful multiple themes but when the control panel works. some might say don't listen to that guy but be honest Anything can look pretty but if it doesn't do what you want don't bother now only semi running on one system .
short answer:
windows 7 = windows vista
slightly longer answer: vista was released prematurely and was trashed by everyone. windows 7 will essentially be vista service pack 3 or 4. new name helps to trick old people and uneducated consumers.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |