I have to agree. Linksys router and Windows XP SP2 firewall is my configuration choice also. Eighteen months of experience now and zero bad results, so far. My AV is Avast free version. I have two Dell PC's.
Both have this configuration. One is primary with heavy use by a self described Power User (Me).
Second one is a backup and dual use PC.
I run windows firewall and zone alarm firewall together and have no problem with them, they work great together, once I got them set up correctly.
I tried just letting my router keep my computer safe, what a mistake that was. I was hacked within a week. I turned on the routers firewall and set it up but they still hacked my computer.
DON'T depend on your router protecting your computer completely. It's a good idea to have at least one good firewall. But it doesn't matter what you use, if a hacker wants to get into your computer, they will. You just need to make it as hard as possible for them to do it.
A good anti-virus program is one of the best ways to protect your computer. You want one that will detect any incoming viruses and any out going programs that may be carrying personnel information.
You also need a good spy ware program.
Run the virus program at least once a day. The spy ware program at least once a week. This will keep your computer safer than having a lot of firewalls installed.
You cannot keep your computer 100% safe, no matter what you do. Windows has too many holes in it. One of the draw backs of using windows.
I run windows xp home, zone alarm firewall,spybot search and destory, ad-aware(yes, you can run more than one spy ware program, you just have to fine the ones that work together), and grisoft avg.
Even with all of these programs, I still get a bad program, spy ware, or virus on my computer.
DON'T think for a second that all of your programs are going to protect you 100%, they won't. Check your computer as often as you think it is needed. Set up a schedule in all your programs to run at a set time on a set day.
I tried Norton and finally blew it off. It caused more problems then it was worth.
There's a lot of virus, spy ware, and firewalls out there. Don't be afraid to try them until you find the ones that work best for you.
Happy surfing
USE WINDOW FIREWALL.THAT WHAT I WAS TOLD.MY PEOPLE THAT I KNOW WHO KNOWS A LOT ABOUT COMPUTERS.TRUST ME WILL BILL GATE HURT YOUR PC,
I run windows firewall and zone alarm along with grisoft AVG. I have no trouble and have been running these for about 3 years now. I can see no trouble with running more then one firewall if you have them set up correctly. Use what u are happy with. If u have trouble along the line, try something else. Not all firewalls will work well together. So far I've only found one firewall that will not work well with windows firewall, Avast.
Happy surfing
I have read a few responses supporting Comodo. That's a little off topic (the author of this thread asked for opinions regarding Pc-Cillin versus Windows Firewall), but based on my experience with Comodo, I'm compelled to respond in the hopes it will help others from making the same mistake I made.
To preface my comments, I'm probably an "average" computer user (certainly not a programmer or techie or a power-user). So these remarks are for those who probably fall within the novice to average computer skill level range. My hunch is that is probably most of us.
I have Eset Nod32, Superantispyware, and Spybot S&D on my system, along with CCleaner. Without too much difficulty, I have been able to fairly quickly figure out the basics of these programs and then progress to some of their more advanced features. About a month ago I downloaded Comodo Firewall Pro (CFP) version 3 based on the positive things I read about it here and on other web sites. I failed to pay attention to what critics had to say. My learning experience with CFP was quite an eye-opener compared with the other programs I just mentioned.
In my opinion, a good software program should meet four criteria: (1) It should do it's job reasonably well, (2) It should have understandable instructions and be fairly easy to figure out the basics, (3) it should not have major bugs that will cause system crashes, and (4) it should have an effective uninstaller that will sufficiently remove the program without leaving residual traces behind that interfere with your system. I believe Comodo Firewall Pro version 3 fails at three of these four criteria.
Regarding (1), my understanding is that CFP does very well in leak tests. Assuming that is an accurate understanding, then kudos to them. Regarding (2), CFP may be effective, but I never could figure out how it works...not even the basics. The terminology and instructions are difficult to understand and unless one has a lot of experience with firewall and HIPS concepts, it will leave you feeling dazed. Regarding (3), the last straw for me in trying to cope with this monster was when I ran a routine CHKDSK (Check Disk), which is something I do every few weeks along with defragging just to keep my hard drive well-maintained. I don't even know how to describe what happened next other than to say my system had a major crash and would not reboot, not even in Safe mode. My wife and I finally got it restarted using something called Last Known Good Configuration. I now read in Comodo's forums that a major bug in CFP causes system crashes like this when the user is running CHKDSK. Lastly regarding (4), it's also acknowledged in Comodo's forums that the CFP uninstaller is impotent. My experience was similar as those mentioned in those threads, i.e., the uninstaller is so poor and leaves so much of the program behind that Windows still thinks CFP is installed and you can't reactivate Windows Firewall. I spent hours last night ripping a plethora of remaining Comodo entries out of the registry until I got bleary-eyed. Even that wasn't good enough. I then had to run a command and delete some files in Explorer to apparently reset Windows Firewall. I'll find out later today or tomorrow if I was successful (hoping and praying).
I believe no novice or average computer user should have to go through this, regardless whether or not the product is "free". Indeed, the time I spent this past month coping with CFP cost a lot more than what I would have spent buying a more user-friendly firewall product. I also believe and respectfully submit that CNET needs to be more careful in their software evaluations by factoring in the four criteria mentioned in my comments before recommending a product (as they've done in their blogs).
Wow! Now that's more like it! Thanks for the info that has stayed on point. I appreciate it.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |