Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

General Mac hardware discussions: Switching to mac

by lohen_37 - 1/2/08 10:53 AM
Post 16 of 24

I thought so...

by mriz - 1/27/08 8:18 AM In reply to: I thought so, by mrmacfixit Moderator

I agree with you that every vendor will indeed push to sell every product on earth...be it software or otherwise. That's the underlying premise of every business in our society. However, I cleared my first virus that my Mac AV detected. I work systems professionally. No machine that we deploy on any enterprise nor that I build, run or maintain has been or will be without AV. You are always welcome to disagree. However, from my technical perspective, I'm always more confident being safer now than sorrier later. Thanks.

Post 17 of 24

Agree to disagree,

by mrmacfixit Moderator - 1/27/08 10:29 AM In reply to: I thought so... by mriz

just as a matter of interest, what was the first virus that your Mac AV detected?

P

Post 18 of 24

Virus..

by mriz - 1/29/08 8:48 AM In reply to: Agree to disagree, by mrmacfixit Moderator

The MacAV picked up W32.Doly.11 and W32.Dumador.
Both came in through from Windows running on Parallels. I've since migrated over to VMWare Fusion and will need to upgrade my AV on the Windows side. Both viruses were picked up through the MacAV. Hence, this is a loophole for viruses to make it to the Mac world.

Post 19 of 24

Close but no cigar

by mrmacfixit Moderator - 1/29/08 9:24 AM In reply to: Virus.. by mriz

Those two miscreants are Windows viruses, more accurately Trojans, that only run on Windows, they do not run on OS X.

When you run Windows on your Mac, no matter whether it is by using a Virtual Machine or BootCamp, the running copy of Windows is as open to viruses as any other WinBox. The viruses that attack Windows do not run on Mac OS X. You could have a copy of Windows that was totally bogged down with viruses, the Mac side would be unaffected.

This is not a loophole for viruses to make it in, those viruses do not work.

You load up your Mac HD with those viruses and all they would do is take up space. We used to put infected Windows hard drives into a Mac and run AV software on them, knowing that the Mac would be unaffected by whatever was on the Windows HD.

As I said before, running AV on a Mac will alert you to Windows viruses and possibly prevent you from sending them on to those who run an OS that would be damaged by them.

Currently there are NO viruses, in the wild, that work on OS X. If you have real evidence to the contrary, please post.

P

Post 20 of 24

Either Way...

by mriz - 1/29/08 10:27 AM In reply to: Close but no cigar by mrmacfixit Moderator

Trojans, Viruses or whatever...no computer goes unprotected. Thanks.

Post 21 of 24

Nice one

by innocent_bystander - 1/29/08 1:17 PM In reply to: Either Way... by mriz

A fine rebuttal

Post 22 of 24

Switching to a MAC

by colonnaf - 1/26/08 6:39 PM In reply to: Switching to mac by lohen_37

First of all, if you truly switched to a MAC the only way you can add a Microsoft operating system is to add the Parallel program to the MAC. That allows you to have two O/S on your MAC. After installing the Parallel program you then install the MS O/S accordingly. As for RAM, be sure to put RaM into the MAC that is compatible. Depending on which MAC you bought, all the items you mentioned may not be able to be installed on the MAC. For instance, I have an IMAC with all hardware and software built in. To use a hard drive from another computer (pc) for instance, buy an external case and put the drive into that. These cases usually run from $20 on up. Once that is done, you then simply plug the external drive into the USB/Firewire socket and you now have another drive for use with the MAC. Leopard is the latest O/S for the MAC and can only be installed on a MAC.

Post 23 of 24

Many other ways to run Windows of course

by RenoDavid - 1/27/08 12:15 AM In reply to: Switching to a MAC by colonnaf

Besides Apples's own Boot Camp there are 4 other ways to run Window's programs on a Mac. From an August 2007 CNET blog:

"With VMware's official release of Fusion 1.0 less than two weeks ago, there are now no less than four different ways to run Windows applications on Intel-based Macs. Fusion, as well as SWsoft's Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac use virtualization technology to allow you to simultaneously run the Windows operating system as a virtual machine alongside the Mac OS. CrossOver Mac 6.0 from CodeWeavers uses a different virtualization approach by building on the open-source API, Wine, which allows you to run individual Windows applications in the Mac OS without needing to install or run the Windows operating system."

Post 24 of 24

Not what he asked

by mrmacfixit Moderator - 1/27/08 7:17 AM In reply to: Switching to a MAC by colonnaf

The poster wanted to know what hardware changes he would have to make on his PC so that he could run OS X.
He did not actually switch to a Mac, he still has a PC.

P

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software