Version: 2008
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Forum display:

Community Newsletter: Q&A: What can I do to improve the speed of my Vista machine?

by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator - 1/11/08 3:13 PM
advertisement
Post 376 of 394

My Alienware has no problems with Vista

by vickie46 - 1/19/08 9:16 AM In reply to: What can I do to improve the speed of my Vista machine? by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

Hi, I have an Alienware Area-51 M9750 laptop with a Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHZ T7400 4 MB 667 MHZ processor with 2 GB Ram and I haven't had any problems with this computer at all and I don't see where it is that slow. The only time it seems a little slow is downloading things from Sims2 website. Of course, Alienware doesn't preload anything on your computer unless you request it. I am running Avast! free antivirus. A lot of computers you buy from chain stores are cheaper priced and cheaper quality and they just don't run as good overall, whether it is desktop or laptop. I have an Alienware desktop and I needed a laptop to take with me to move to warmer climate for the winter. My first and only choice was Alienware. I really don't have problems with Vista. It seems to be the same as XP for me. Thanks.

Post 377 of 394

Heres your answer Pal.

by nagar_yuktarth - 1/23/08 9:00 AM In reply to: What can I do to improve the speed of my Vista machine? by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

These are some points which can help you.please read them briefly

Windows Boot Timer 1.0 This utility displays the time taken by your
computer to load Windows.
PCMark05 This is an application-based benchmark. The
latest version of the popular PCMark series
is a premium tool for measuring overall PC
performance.
TestDisk & PhotoRec 6.7 TestDisk is a powerful data recovery utility
that retrieves the destroyed partition tables
due to certain types of viruses or human.

Turning off Windows in a jiffy: There
are still some obstacles that delay
the shutting down process such as
unmanageable services, driver problems,
and programs that cannot be closed. You
can overcome these obstacles by using
Force Down Lite, which not only shuts
down your computer in a flash but also
avoids the risk of losing your data in the
process. When you select the ‘Normal
Shutdown’ option, it checks for open
applications with unsaved data and asks
if you still want to save it. Another utility
for a rapid shut down of Windows is
‘SuperFast Shutdown’. This application
does not consider any unsaved data.
However, it turns off XP and Vista in the
fraction of a second, so it is not advised
to use this utility if you have files opened
on your system.
Now, get ready to turn your Windows
into a super fast operating system! Do let
us know about your experience
error.
CC leaner 1.40.5 CCleaner cleans your hard disk of unused
files and redundant registry entries
therby freeing valuable hard disk space
and optimizing your system for better
performance.
EasyBCD 1.6 This utility is a powerful bootloader
modification tool that allows you to modify
the Vista boot configuration.
DoubleDriver DoubleDriver is capable of scanning and
backing up the drivers installed on your
system in a jiffy.
Force Down Lite 2.5.22 Force Down Lite can assure you a fast and
guaranteed execution of the Windows
Shutdown process in a safe manner.
SuperFast Shutdown 1.0 This utility enables you to shutdown
Windows nstantly. Should not be used if you
are working on critical files.

Tuning The Booting Process
Cleaning the registry and startup
entries: Keeping Windows clean of
unwanted files and entries helps a lot in
boosting your computer’s performance.
But then you can’t be sure of the files that
need to be eliminated. So, use CCleaner
and finish all the cleaning processes at
one go. The standard settings for tools
are sufficient most of the time. It is only
when you want to keep particular cookies
(for example, to avoid repeating the
registration in a web forum) that you will
need to define the personal exceptions
using ‘Settings’.
Subsequently, remove all the
unnecessary programs that start
automatically through ‘Tools | Startup’.
The auto-start entries in Vista for the side
bar, Defender, and the Welcome, which
are available after a standard installation,
do not decelerate Windows. Hence, you
can let them remain in the auto-start
directory. It is advisable to defragment
the hard disk after the cleaning process.
Restart the PC after the maintenance
work is done.
Applying boot.ini parameters in Vista:
You need to get used to the BCD Editor
available in Vista to make changes to the
boot configuration data. Tools such as
EasyBCD provide a graphical interface to
the BCD Editor. If you want to use the
usual boot parameters of XP in Vista, you
can make use of the new command ‘set
load options’ in Vista. If you want to turn
off the boot logo, enter the term ‘cmd’
in the search field. Once the search is
performed, right-click on ‘cmd.exe’ and
select ‘Run as Administrator’.
In the command prompt, type ‘bcdedit
/set loadoptions “noguiboot”’. You can
find more boot.ini parameters at http://
msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/
aa906217.aspx that you can apply in a
similar manner.
Replace defective drivers: Poor device
drivers not only reduce the speed of
the operating system, but can also lead
to malfunctioning of the system which
causes the dreaded ‘BSOD (Blue Screen
Of Death)’. In order to avoid such a
situation, you must save all the existing
drivers, examine them and replace
the defective ones. Use DoubleDriver
for the driver backup; the operation is
self-explanatory. You can also use Driver
Verifier Manager to find defective device
drivers. To open Driver Verifier Manager,
click ‘Start | Run’ and type ‘verifier’. In
Driver Verifier Manager, click ‘Create
Standard Settings | Automatically select all
drivers installed on this computer’. Then,
click on ‘Finish’ and restart your computer.
After your computer is restarted, open
the Driver Verifier Manager and click on
‘Display information about the currently
verified drivers’ to examine the log file
created by the Driver Verifier Manager and
replace the defective drivers. If you see a
BSOD while your computer restarts, boot
Windows in safe mode and search for the
defective driver in the log file. Remove
this driver and end the test with ‘Delete
existing settings’.
Shutting down Windows faster
without errors
After you have finished all your work,
you would not want to spend another
fifteen odd minutes lingering around your
computer .

HOPE THIS WORKS!

Post 378 of 394

ALL THOSE PROGRAMS?

by Good-PC.Guy! - 1/23/08 11:38 PM In reply to: Heres your answer Pal. by nagar_yuktarth

VERY NICE OF YOU TO ALERT US ALL ABOUT ALL THAT BUT, I WONDER IF YOU HAVE ACTUALLY TRIED IT ALL ON A PC YOURSELF!?
SEEMS LIKE ALL THAT COULD CAUSE ABOUT AS MUCH TROUBLE AS IT'S MEANT TO SOLVE.

Post 379 of 394

Speed up boot time

by edd3800 - 7/27/08 10:04 AM In reply to: What can I do to improve the speed of my Vista machine? by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

I've had Vista (home premium) for a little over a year. On my xp system
I was able to tweak it and get my boot time down to 45 seconds. On Vista
the best I could do was 1 min 45 seconds. When I say boot time I mean from the time i turn the power on till the computer is ready to go. I disabled some services,(I have 40 running at start up) left aero on,but turned off some features. The only way I could get it to boot a little faster than 1min 45 sec was to turn off things I needed or wanted to run.
Then I found a program called WinBubble 1.73. I only use one feature on the program. You'll find the setting in the Optimize tab. It's Enable/
Disable Multiple Monitor Configuration. I set it to disable. I've been running on this setting for two weeks, no problems on my system from this change. Boot time is now 54 seconds.

Post 380 of 394

Vista speedup

by drjnc - 7/27/08 11:54 AM In reply to: Speed up boot time by edd3800

Where did you find the "optimize" tab? Can't find where you made the monitor changes.

Post 381 of 394

Vista speedup

by edd3800 - 7/27/08 12:17 PM In reply to: Vista speedup by drjnc

When you open Winbubble there should be 8 tabs, General, Specific, Icons,Security, Optimize,IE,Mis,and Tips and tricks. Click on Optimize
then under More on speeding-up click Enable/Disable Multiple Monitor
Configuration. Then you get the choice of enable or disable. If I remember right when I downloaded Winbubble it was a zip file . I think I open the zip then extracted all files then doubled clicked winbubble,
then doubled clicked WinBubbles Application

Post 382 of 394

It's A Shame

by afro2358 - 7/27/08 12:29 PM In reply to: Speed up boot time by edd3800

It's a shame that people who uses Windwos Vista have to "Tweak" their own computer just to make it run a little faster, You would never had to do that with Windows XP. That is why i took that "Junk" (Vista) off my computer and went back to XP. I remember when XP first came out, there was never an issue with hardwares or softwares, but with Vista, problems. Microsoft should be ashame of themselves for bringing out an OS like this. The only thing i know is when MS ever do come out with a "New" Operating System, i will be very careful not to rush into buying another one.

Post 383 of 394

Shame??

by edd3800 - 7/27/08 3:51 PM In reply to: It's A Shame by afro2358

Well I don't know about it being a shame. When I had xp the first thing I had to do was add Ram because xp was so slow. Then I tweaked the heck out of xp. When xp first came out it seemed like most users hated it. Heard same arguments, that I hearing now about vista. Programs don't work, driver problems, installing issues, resource hog.
I think it just takes time to work out all the kinks in a new os. Same with the software companies they need time to get their program right.
My first two years with xp I couldn't count how many times I got the blue screen of Death. It was because of xp that I had to learn more about computers. Many programs crashed xp. After a couple of years my xp was a lean mean machine.
Now with Vista I had to wait for the software companies to come up with a Vista program. Had to wait 6 months for a good firewall. I've had Vista for a little over a year and only had one crash.It never freezes on me like xp did.
Yes,Vista is a hog, but every time Microsoft comes in with a new OS it uses a lot more resources than the old one. I like Vista it runs good, and is getting better as more updated drivers come out.
Is Vista better than XP? In my first three weeks with Vista I was kicking myself for buying a new computer with vista. But as i got use to it, and figured out how to make it work for me I started to like it. Now I wouldn't go back to xp if you paid me.
My biggest gripe with Mircosoft is why couldn't they make a OS that could run well with out the need for so much computer power.

Post 384 of 394

Shame

by afro2358 - 7/27/08 6:46 PM In reply to: Shame?? by edd3800

More power was never my concern, i knew before i brought vista that their OS needs at least 500MB of Ram to start off with. With my Dell XPS Gen 3, i already had 4GB of Ram, it was just that i was spending more of my time on my computer trying to correct things then i ever did before, i just had enough of it. And when Microsoft was about to stop selling their Windows XP at the end of June, i rush to get me a Dell Laptop with XP on it. Maybe one day Vista will get their act together,but, by that time, microsoft will probably have a new OS. But right now, as far as i am concern, vista is just not ready for Prime Time, but then again, that's just my opinion.

Post 385 of 394

Yes and no

by santuccie - 7/27/08 11:36 PM In reply to: Shame?? by edd3800

One thing I don't remember hearing about in 2001 was Microsoft getting sued for deceptive (ready) labeling. When XP came out, a P2 with 128 MB of RAM could run it just fine; and by that time, we already had the P4. It got a little heavier in 2004 with SP2, but not unreasonably so. With Vista Home Premium, it takes as much as 768 MB of RAM just to sit there; with XP, it shouldn't take more than 192.

That said, I'm glad to be hearing from someone who really prefers Vista over XP. I just ordered a new laptop from TigerDirect with desktop power (Core 2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 667 bus, 3 GB DDR2 PC-5300 RAM, 250 GB HDD, etc.) and a nice look. It uses integrated graphics, but fast integrated graphics with up to 384 MB shared (I can spare that), which is plenty for my purposes. I watch DVDs, occasionally record the screen and sound card, and play Flash/DOSBox games (I grew up in a 2D world).

I've fixed my fair share of Vista machines, but good, old WinDoctor is pretty much always enough to take care of instability issues; the new OS really is harder to mess up than XP. I've had it bluescreen with certain programs, but that's not Vista's fault, and compatibility issues have cleared up enough that I have some alternatives. And the OS is a lot tougher against malware; you could actually surf the Web under Vista without antivirus and such, though I don't recommend it.

Windows 7 may answer your desire for a Microsoft OS that runs well without gobbling up resources, but in the meantime, Vista is just fine on a unit with a certain amount of power.

Post 386 of 394

Your'e Right

by edd3800 - 7/28/08 3:50 PM In reply to: Yes and no by santuccie

Santuccie I had forgotten all about the Ready for Vista computer sales in late 2006. I would have been pissed. Buy a new computer put vista on it and you have a snail. If that would have happen to me,it's possible that I would be a Mac owner.
I'm not a computer tech guy, more like a beginner with a little knowledge.
I do prefer Vista. Vista isn't faster than xp, or a better os than xp. Though it's suppose to be more secure than xp. I like it because it's different. I had xp for years and was ready for a change. It has better tools than xp its easier for this beginner to play with. I really like the look. (eye candy)
Thanks for the tip on WinDoctor will check it out today, and see if it's something a noob like me can use.

Post 387 of 394

Thank you

by santuccie - 7/28/08 4:15 PM In reply to: Your'e Right by edd3800

I should mention that Vista can run fairly fast if you know how to fix it up. And it's not just disabling a bunch of services; all you have to do is fix some software errors with WinDoctor, and it runs ever so much faster. It's easy; it will ask you for permission to update software, and you affirm. WinDoctor starts, and you click next a couple times. When it's finished, you view all the errors, and tell it to fix all.

If you need help, you can click on my profile and e-mail me directly.

Post 388 of 394

BTW

by santuccie - 7/28/08 5:01 PM In reply to: Your'e Right by edd3800

And yes, Vista is much more secure than XP. It has the same advantage that makes Apple and Linux so secure: the kernel is locked. Also, it has well-defined driver functions, User Account Control (UAC), and Secure Development Lifecycle (SDL).

Windows Vista is considered by some experts to be the most secure major operating system out of the box. "Major" is open to interpretation, but I consider it any operating system (or family of operating systems) that gets press. This includes Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

Post 389 of 394

$

by puma - 7/28/08 6:11 PM In reply to: BTW by santuccie

care to inform us on how much ms pays you to be a spokesmodels? ...come on, you know that straight out of the box vista is no where as secure as mac os x or any flavor of linux - LOL. it is not close in ease of use either... a computer is only a tool to get work done. there are different tools for different jobs. there is no one tool that does it all. sure windows is a jack-of-all-trade operating system, but it's master of none, literally speaking...

Post 390 of 394

Spokesman?

by santuccie - 7/28/08 6:33 PM In reply to: $ by puma

So now I'm the liar? Vista is less secure than OS-X and Linux? Sources, please. I've already shown you mine, and explained why Vista is not only as secure, but more secure than OS-X and most Linux distros (Not all; I believe some of them have virtualization right out of the box. This is available for Vista as well, but not preloaded.). I have fully substantiated my claims; all you've done is assert, "No, you're wrong!" without anything to backup your claims. And again, you've done this after seeing proof from me. You have knowingly told another lie.

'it is not close in ease of use either... a computer is only a tool to get work done'
>>Really? What's so hard about Vista? And especially, how is Linux of all things easier to use than Vista? Have you used Linux? Have you used Vista? Now you're all over the place, just because you can't accept the agony of correction. Do your homework, kid, and learn the proper way to debate. If you actually know something that refutes what I know, then present it to me. If you don't (and I'm sure you don't, because I've looked and found nothing to the contrary), then either admit that you don't, or quietly drop out of the debate. Don't make a fool of yourself by contending further when you've already been refuted. In other words, STOP LYING!

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software