you are absolutely right, nature cannot be harmed. the earth has cycles that will correct itself. problem is, part of that correction could be that humans can be wiped out as part of that correction. the bottom line, whether you agree with climate change or not, excess use of energy is causing pollution, which causes many problems for us that are not even of concern to the climate change movement.
if you can reduce the amount of energy you use and help the people that live near you breathe cleaner air and have less health risks, i think that is a noble idea.
rebecca, i hope you find some good answers here, as i will be looking also. i've done my part in buying CFL for lights, making sure all appliances not in use are unplugged, and always making sure to turn hot water heater off when i go away. i also wash all laundry in cold water.
if i can find a way to use less energy on my computer i will do that also. currently, i just turn the monitor off when the computer is not in use.
And yet another one.
I have wondered about the energy my new computer with Visa is useing as I never shut my computer off. I always put it in sleep mode so I dont have to wait for the computer to start up which takes time. I would like to also know the energy my computer is useing.
I dont know about the music question as I have not done any of that as yet.
Unless this has been removed from Vista, it is a viable option. In your power settings, you should can enable hibernation, so that when you hit the front panel switch, the computer transfers all current memory to a disc file, and then shuts off completely. You can unplug it and move it around without the risk of losing data.
When you power it back up, instead of sitting there for half an hour loading drivers, it just copies the disc file back to memory and picks up where you left off (assuming you've not changed any hardware in the off state).
XP is the first Windows that I've encountered that can handle this properly and stably, so I would guess that it remains a feature in Vista (although, I could be completely wrong about the dark side).
I turn off my 42"LCD Television, whenever we are not watching it, but my wife likes it on when we leave home to keep the dog entertained. Likewise my computers, and monitor go off every evening, and frequently during the day, when I leave the house.
Rebbecca,
There is no "probably" about this. Plasma and LCD TVs DO consume more power than traditional CRT sets. And there ARE Energy Star devices across the board. www.energystar.gov is the official Energy Star website, and they define an Energy Star product as one that uses 30% less power than the average appliance. One of the struggles, according to the website, is that as we are using more and more devices more frequently, Energy Star has had to tighten its specifications to meet the new usage patterns. So part of the reason why you don't see many Energy Star devices is that they are redefining what is needed to earn the rating (unlike something like fridges and freezers, whose usage really hasn't changed much). The other reason is simple economics: if people don't see the value of the Energy Star seal or aren't willing to pay for it, they'll buy the cheaper model.
So what can you do when purchasing electronics? Energy Star has a great computer website, http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=find_a_product.showProductGroup&pgw_code=CO which allows you to enter your technical specifications and find an Energy Star computer. Another way to "go green" when purchasing a computer is to intentionally buy a lower-performance machine. Most people probably don't need a 250GB hard drive, a quad-core processor, and all those other bells and whistles (even though the sales rep will try and sell you up to that model when you tell him you want to do "basic" photo editing). Of course, you want to make sure you can grow into your computer so you don't have to keep buying new equipment, so find a good balance.
TVs are a bit more difficult. CRTs use the least amount of energy, followed by LCD, and plasma is the power hog. OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) screens will be coming out on more devices; they are thin, light, bright, bendable, and comparatively power-efficient, though currently it isn't feasible to put them on larger screens. You'll probably see more of them in cell phones, PDAs, and laptops. So if you want a power efficient TV that has great picture, a good-quality LCD would be your best bet.
The best thing you can do to conserve power is to turn of electronic equipment when not in use for longer periods of time. Another thing that most people don't realize is consuming power is "standby power." Standby power keeps your devices like TVs just barely turned off so that they can turn on and be fully warmed up at a moment's notice. Other devices like VCRs, DVRs, microwaves, and video game systems that have internal clocks, timers, or connect to the internet for updates while you're not using them are also consuming standby power. You can reduce standby power consumption by hooking several items into a power strip and turning the strip off when not in use. Be careful of two things: first, if you are using a surge protector, turning it off might disable surge protection while keeping a circuit available for surges to follow, and second, disconnecting power like this will probably reset things like your clock, recording times, and other settings, so don't turn off items whose settings you can't afford to lose. Wall warts also consume a fair bit of standby power, so hook up a power strip to those and turn them off as well. No point in having your cell phone and iPod chargers sucking up power while you're at work (they consume very little power, but over the course of a year, it adds up).
Of course, there are also the standard-fare things like switching to CFL lights (though LEDs will become cheaper, more efficient, and more environmentally friendly in the coming years), but you were asking more on the electronics level, so that's where I'm focusing. If you can live with a slightly less-high-end TV or computer that's more power-friendly, that will help a lot.
I really believe jskrenes has it right. The only thing I would add is simply rather than ensuring efficiency, reduce waste energy by simply turning off items that don't need to be on. While these things aren't specifically electronic you can also save alot of energy by turning the heat down and putting on a sweat shirt. When its warm outside and your doing laundry, try and use a cloths line, this is so much more environmentally friendly on so many levels, and your cloths will seem so fresh. Avoid using disposable items.
I think the reason why consumer electronics have not been classified into energy star rating is that their consumption is much lower than that of a refrigerator or washing machine. Even the powerful amplifiers are only a few hundred watts continuous. However it is an excellent idea to have a rating system. Plasma will become obsolete as LCD catches up in contrast and response time. Not counting people who regularly use the built-in timers for automatic recording etc., I suggest that all consumer electronics equipment should be turned off at the wall socket. Try buying items that remember their settings even when turned off. Program your PC to turn itself off if not in use for more than 30 mins.
Great question Rebecca! Thankfully hardware technologies are moving in the direction of resposibility.
LCD Screens use about 1/2 of the power of equivalent sized CRT screens of just a few years ago, and with LED backlit screens emerging on Laptops, and OLED screens on the horizon there will be another big drop in power being used for our displays in the next few years.
Intel and AMD marketing for system builders is becoming more and more a message of computing power per watt used. And as hard disk platter sizes continue to shrink, so does thier power consumption.
Now for that monster video card you are using, make sure you really need that performance before you begin to eat up the watts.
PC power consumption is far more important than just the power being used by the PC itself. Most of the power that goes into these devices ends up being shed as heat, and the more heat that is generated, the more power is used in most companies to use airconditioning to cool the workplace.
One of the most wasteful uses of PCs that I can think of are the thousands of PCs that will be running this evening, or this weekend just so someone can use a remote access program for an hour or two, or not. This has got to exemplify the worst of the PC power wasting activities that could be imagined!
We all need to make small steps to help the environment. We can use screens and computers that go ligher on our resources, we can make sure we return old hardware to recyclers, and we can still do the work, and play the games that we want to play, while keeping both our use, and our conservation in balance.
What do I do? Whenever I upgrade my systems at home, I look for the latest in power conservation components. I build some of my own systems, and look for power conserving components. I don't leave systems running for hours on end (Unless I have a long Virus Scan, or Update to run) and use lower power consumption laptops for most of my work.
- - Steve
I don't know a lot about the current situation with TVs, so I will go straight to computers.
The two items that use the most power in the computer are the CPU and the graphics card. With the release of the Intel Core 2 Duo, CPUs have become much more efficient. I believe the newest generation Core 2 Duo uses around 50 watts under load, and something like 4 watts in idle. This is consideribly less than the 100+ watts they used about 3 years ago. The CPU manufacturers are making an effort to make their products more efficient.
Now the graphics card is a different story. The graphics card manufacturers are just starting to realize the benefit of lower power usage, which is less heat output. This benefits the graphics card companies by allowing them to make more powerful cards, and it benefits you by making cards that take less energy. Right now, graphics cards take a ridiculous amout of power, often more than the CPU. If you are in the market for a new graphics card, but are concerned about energy consumption, I would suggest that you wait a year or two to allow the manufacturers to release more efficient cards.
When I am looking for a new CPU or graphics card, I simply google that item plus power consumption, and pick the one that uses less energy. Many tech review websites now post energy consumption figures.
Another important aspect in computer efficiency is the power supply that converts the wall power into DC power the computer can use. Previously, power supplies converted only about 65% of the power they took from the wall into useable power. Curent power supplies have improved to 80%-85% efficiency. If you are looking for a new power supply, try to get one that is 80plus certified. This means it has been certified to operate at 80% or higher efficiency.
At home, I try to turn my computer and other electronic devices off or on standby when I am not using them. I say standby because some products, like DVRs, do not function properly with no power. Besides, standby mode usually uses less than a watt of energy.
Consumer electronics are getting more efficient. If you are concerned, just google power consumption plus the item you are looking for, and you will easily be able to find the one that uses the least power.
Energy consumption by large consumer products is something that must be seriously considered. Personally, I won't have a bar of plasma technology. It is over-rated, over-priced, over-consumptive, and too easily damaged.
As far as computers are concerned, I have quite a few, each of which has a dedicated task. When that task is required, turn on and use, turn off when finished.
I also have a general use machine which does run 24 hours (the one I'm using to answer this). I am in the process of transferring all this to a laptop which will be able to do exactly the same thing (slightly slower maybe) on much less power.
If anything, the technology industry must over-come the disposability mentality. If I had gained access to a PostScript laser printer back in the day, I would still be using the DOS version of MS Word and would still be doing so on a 286. Alas, such a printer was out of my financial reach and I had to resort to the fonts offered by changing over to (gak) Windoze.
Go to any rubbish tip and see how many perfectly functional computers are dumped simply because of 'upgrading'. 90% of computer users do not need much more than a 386 to take care of their daily matters.
My mother's email machine is a Toshiba Satellite 440CDX with a whopping great 16MB that screams along at 133 MHz, and yes, compared to earlier machines those are big numbers, but compared to "modern" machines it would also be found on the rubbish heap several layers deep.
Now, there is another problem to consider with that machine. Because of Surface Mount technology and multi-layer boards, if something fails, the machine will end up on the rubbish heap because it will be virtually irreparable.
This is the same problem with desktop machines. Video card playing up? Chuck and replace.
It's cheaper to buy a new printer than to replace the ink in the original, and we all know about the $2 watch that you throw away because it costs $3 to buy a new battery.
ConsumerISM needs to be reigned in, and manufacturers have to back away from "planned obsolescence".
Look at the original PC. It was solid, simple, and at the time of building was designed to last. Every chip was "off the shelf", and for about $200 you could carry enough spare parts to be able to service many, many machines.
Now you have the Intel/AMD fight. My CPU has failed which means I have to replace the motherboard as well, because that CPU isn't supported anymore.... and it just goes on.
Ultimately, we are responsible in our purchase choices. I expect products like fridge, washing machine, dishwasher, etc. to last the term of my natural life. I expect a TV to last a minimum of 10 years, preferably closer to 20.
Energy ratings on TVs is a great idea, unless you're pushing plasma screens. I am happy with what I have now, and hopefully when I face "upgrading" it will be OLED technology.
...nuclear energy! It takes us out of the war for oil; is renewable; kills global warming from coal-fired, oil-fired and gas-fired generators; and is safe and efficient. The real issue is that we have had atomic energy for over fifty years. The French create 80% of the energy from nuclear energy. Forget about your graphics card, go out and lobby for clean, safe, renewable energy. GO MARINERS!
Global warming is NOT a scientific fact. Energy Star is designd to save you money, it's NOT a liberal desire of the manufacturers to be energy conservative. It's a SELLING point. Go back to school and learn something about how our economy is driven before you make these silly statements about global energy shortages. There are conflicting facts, reports AND studies about these concerns. It's DESIGNED to scare you into buying new products so that manufacturers may capitolize on your fear. Stop spreading the fear or go campaigning with Al Gore. But make an educated decision.
I agree, education is a wonderful thing - you should try some of it. And I don't mean merely reading the "Junk science" items on Fox News. I mean real science and real education. Will you find that everyone agrees? No, but the preponderance of the evidence supports environmentalism to some degree. YELLING with your Caps Lock key proves nothing other than that you know how be annoying.
Your post represents one side of an essentially religious argument. The actual science is complex and admittedly equivocal. However, the other side of the religious debate at least has prudence going for it.
I'm fairly informed about this but must admit this point of view is new to me. What does religion have to do with it?
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |