Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Forum display:

Cell phones: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year"

by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator - 11/7/07 1:26 PM
advertisement
Post 211 of 278

It's not an inventioon but a mating of technology

by gkamer - 11/10/07 8:35 AM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

I hate to say it but Apple did not invent a cell phone any more than Lexus invented the automobile.

Apple took existing technology (music player, cell phone, palm pilot, etc) combined them with some eye candy and came up with the iPhone. They don't deserve credit for inventing anything.

Lexus took an automobile and used technology to let it "park itself" but they did not invent the automobile.

Post 212 of 278

NOWAY

by GlockNinja - 11/10/07 7:09 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

First of all Apple did not invent anything, let alone the cell phone or its abilities. Apple did not invent the computer, it did not invent the computer language, nor did it invent graphics interface we know as Windows or OS.

Apple like Microsoft are only software companies that built upon what already existed. The Iphone brings web browsing, picture taking, music and video, to one device but its not the only device that can do that.

For Time magazine to award "Invention of the Year" to the Iphone is like their movie ratings. Totally creditless or responsible. Time is nothing more than a coctail party instead of a news conference. Lets face thats where they get most of their interviews and news...from coctail parties.

Post 213 of 278

yawn

by ogodefacto - 11/11/07 1:16 AM In reply to: NOWAY by GlockNinja

Yup, TIME magazine is a joke magazine. "Best invention of 2006" was youtube? huh? Social phenominum, hell yeah, but invention? Get real. Before that there WAS NO invention of the year, only "'coolest' inventions", all of whick were gimicky novelty gadgets such as the "smart rope".

WHY does anyone care what TIME magaizine thinks about innovations in technology?

People magazine's "Sexiest Man Alive" is more rooted in fact than TIME magazine's assertion. TIME magazine is staffed iMac toting Adobe InDesign white sock print writers, not technologists.

Post 214 of 278

yawn

by Remag1234 - 11/11/07 6:17 AM In reply to: yawn by ogodefacto

ogodefacto: you make one yawn. Everyone of you Apple haters should get a life. The iPhone is the BEST INNOVATIVE GADGET of the year. Whether you like it or not it's here to stay and there already are manufacturers making take-offs/look-a-likes etc. Get your lollipop and suck on it.

Post 215 of 278

am i an apple hater?

by ogodefacto - 11/11/07 6:37 AM In reply to: yawn by Remag1234

Partisanship: is that what this is about to you?
I don't hate apple. In many respects the iPhone is great.
BUT, when people too the word "innovative" around I question their knowledge on the subject. I hear "innovative" and "revolutionary" all the time but when I ask for explicit details on WHAT was innovative and revolutionary from iPhone useers I NEVER get a concrete answer. I sincerely believe that, although apple makes some great products, that the users are painfully ignorant.
Touch screen? Already done.
Video playback? done.
Wi-Fi? done.
Voicemail? done.
the list goes on and on...
The ONLY thing I give the iPhone real props for is for having the best interactive expererience on any portable. But, without unlocking the iPhone it is painfully crippled with anything but a full fledged OS that has NO 3rd party applications other than thin javascipt browser apps. Unlocked means access to PORTED apps, but the real risk of being unable to update later as Apple has been "bricking" the iPhone.
Simple question...
Got a divx/xvid codec on that iPhone? Did't think so.
Please tell me next that I "can't afford one" (that usually does come next).
Sit down, son, you don't know your stuff. Thx for playing.

Post 216 of 278

You are an Apple hater

by Remag1234 - 11/11/07 9:52 AM In reply to: am i an apple hater? by ogodefacto

Okay Pops, [I'm probably older than you].
Everything written here is a play on words. Different words mean different things to everyone. ie. XYZ soap is now new and improved. Does that mean last years wasn't as good?, but last year the ad said is was great, fantastic blah, blah, blah. We agree to disagree. You don't like the wording, get a job at an ad agency and write some ads. I doubt that you would last long. You know it's easy to be a NIT PICKER as you are one. Chill out and make yourself a tall drink and enjoy the iPhone.

Post 217 of 278

k, peace

by ogodefacto - 11/11/07 10:17 AM In reply to: You are an Apple hater by Remag1234

I was belittling TIME magazine, not Apple. TIME magazine is a crap newspaper that knows nothing about technology. It is a print newpaper run by Apple friendly staff (like almost all print magazines are). That is just a fact. AND, I don't doubt that time magazine gets 100,000 "free" iPods for their feature.

Considering that i own a macbook pro (amongst other comps) I am not anti apple. I even own a new iPod nano video. Am I an Apple fanboy? Obviously not. I simply try to tell things the way they are. I'm a Java developer, which is about as cross platform as you can get, so I have no allegiance to any one vendor. Apple makes some good stuff. Microsoft makes some good stuff. Creative Labs has taken lots of my money over the years with good products. My Archos 604 WIFI kills any iPod other than iPhone, AND the 604 (touchscreen, wifi, vid recording) is several years old. Nokia makes awesome stuff, making true innovations without a fraction of the attention Apple gets. Blackberrys are ultra dependable. My Palm Treo Win Mob is extremely extensible. I run Kubuntu LAMP (MySQL, PHP) server (linux) at home and XP (Vista is a memory hog). I also develop in MS C# which was stolen from Java, but Visual Studio is awesome.
Get it?
I don't care who made what. EVERYONE should be getting credit, but for some reason (because Apple pays more for marketing than everyone else combined), people get sucked into Apple's marketing propganda machine and don;t even notice it. Apple is like the Starbucks of computers.
If the iPhone is ever OFFICIALLY unlocked (i doubt it will though), and if nothing better has come along (nothing around right now is better than an unlocked iPhone) I wil personally be first in line to get one.
Sorry if I was a jerk.

Post 218 of 278

Peace is a Good Thing

by Remag1234 - 11/11/07 1:05 PM In reply to: k, peace by ogodefacto

You know your "STUFF". Yes almost everyone has contributed something to the world of computers. Par for the course some make it big and some just get screwed. Agreed that TIME ragazine is crap and is biased in favor of whatever their agenda is at the time. Why anyone subscribes to it is a mystery. I have no need for an iPhone but would get on if they opened it to all carriers [I'm happy with T-Mobile]. I have to admit that 8 years ago I reluctantly purchased Apple stock. Was that ever a great move, it now worth 20X what I paid for it. Now you know why I defend Apple, hey they put big bucks in my pocket.

Post 219 of 278

A phone is a phone

by keithhodgson - 11/11/07 4:49 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

The iphone might be sexy, desirable, etc. but at the end of the day it's just a pretty phone with a few toys, not something new. An invention it is not.

Post 220 of 278

no

by bman222112 - 11/13/07 4:07 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

I don't think the iPone deserves the credit of being invention of the year. Sure its neat and does all kinds of tricks, but other companies have been making similar devices running the windows Pocket PC OS, but they were never named invention of the year. The iPone is just another apple device that is generating more hype than it deserves. I personally think that it is just a waste of money. Ever heard of a tablet PC? well maybe not if you an iFan.

Post 221 of 278

Apple iPhone

by mwwykoff - 11/14/07 1:01 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

Apple did not invent it, but they created it from existing components and should be given credit for the innovation ! Call it the innovation of the year !

Post 222 of 278

Yes

by xfile - 11/15/07 4:15 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

Even I personally won't buy it, but it amazes me for each and every one whom I have asked would consider to buy it, if cost is not a problem and they all have their own favorite brands in the past.

Apple has really done an excellent job on design!

Post 223 of 278

iphone? product of the year? what? really? really really?

by winsoftwareman - 11/15/07 7:53 PM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

okay, just the thing. apple invented a cell phone that has a crappy internet browser, some weird music flip thing, and a touch screen. Priced too high. Basically, apple made a cell phone for us. And, it's not really an invention. Personally, I think the product of the year should be the new XPS. I got one, and it ownz! And, apple contracted with att so you have to pay there bull data and phone bills, and buy a stupid overpriced phone! I don't think so!

Post 224 of 278

YES: I'm not converted YET, but I'm very close

by mjw65 - 11/16/07 1:57 AM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

I've been an 'anythingbutipod' man for years, since I bought my first Creative Zen device. I tend to get a new mp3 player every year. I also look forward with relish to phone upgrade season and pay a lot of attention to both areas. My expectation of the iPhone was lower than most: I didn't expect to like it, that it would be a triumph of style over substance. I was wrong.
I'm not ready to jump yet, but I can see next gen iPhone changing my mind. There's a few things to fix: 3G data speeds for a start; 3rd party apps just as high on the agenda (I want my Mobipocket ebooks and some decent games); decent email client... but this is the most interesting phone to come out since Nokia's slidy Wap-phone.
As to whether it's strictly an 'invention'? If you limit this to a semantically precise definition, then the award becomes meaningless to most people. Perhaps the iPhone is a re-invention... but it's definitely the most interesting consumer electronics device for some time... and I can't way to see the refinements.

Post 225 of 278

SCOREBOARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by castingyou - 11/17/07 11:13 AM In reply to: Poll: Time naming the iPhone "Invention of the year" by Lee Koo (ADMIN) Moderator

All I can say is "SCOREBOARD"... When some moron complains about a Football team who WON or Baseball team who WON and deems it not fair or whatever, then all I can say "SCOREBOARD"!!! or like an Actor not deserving a part in a Film with their talents... SCOREBOARD!!! Their making money and thats a FACT!!! SCOREBOARD!!!!

The same goes for the iPhone! SCOREBOARD!!!! Show me a phone that sold as much and then you can argue whatever you want, yet you CAN'T! The iPhone RULES!!!! SCOREBOARD!!!!

Apple sold up to 700,000 iPhones in the first weekend, but the company is booking sales from the $500 and $600 handsets as subscription revenue over two years!!! SCOREBOARD!!!!

It's that simple! SCOREBOARD!!!!

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software