Finally a way to spend that spare 20 grand thats been sitting in my coin tanker
-Charlie in Phuket
Source: http://apcmag.com/7267/640gb_flash_card_blows_hard_drives_away
<b>640GB flash card blows hard drives away</b>
Utah-based start-up company Fusion-io has unveiled a blisteringly fast, 640GB flash-based PCIe storage card it says can out perform hard drives by a factor of one thousand.
The initial model is designed to slot into a data centre chassis, but it could also be used inside a workstation or suitable PC.
Called the ioDrive, the card can read data at 800 megabytes per second and write at 600 megabytes a second. Initially it will be available in 80, 320 and 640GB versions, however the company has plans to ship a 1.2 terabyte version a little further down the track.
The card's impressive performance, currently sitting at 100,000 IOPS (input / output per second) comes from a proprietary technology called ioMemory.
According to the company's documentation, ioMemory is a new-generation architecture that "combines today's higher density NAND with high speed switching and network protocols to effectively eliminate the performance gap between memory and storage".
Hard drive makers love pointing out the fact that flash memory has a finite life, wearing out after a certain number of read/write cycles.
However Fusion-io says it has incorporated complex error correction techniques to "minimise fatigue and extend the service life of the NAND components within the ioDrive". It says the result is a service life of eight years compared with the typical five-year service life of mechanical hard drives.
When the drive does start to feel its age, users will notice a gradual reduction in available storage space, rather than a sudden failure. This way, no data is lost.
The cards will be available in the US from December this year, however there is no date yet for Australian release. Linux drivers will be available at launch with Windows Vista, XP and Server drivers following shortly after.
Pricing is yet to be confirmed, however the company says it is aiming to ship them for less than $US30 per gigabyte. Sounds cheap? 640GB multiplies out to be $19200. Ouch... sounds like the humble hard drive will be around for a long time yet.
The only reason why it's so expensive is because they can't (for technical or economic reasons) mass market/produce these yet. Give it a few years and you'll probably be able to get one of those 640GB's for 100 dollars, assuming it ever takes off.
Sounds like a great direction, particularly for laptops as far as (I assume) not being damaged by the bumping and jostling that that can affect a hard drive. I do pick on their silly representation about a "gradual reduction in available storage space, rather than a sudden failure. This way, no data is lost." Well, if what do they think happened to the data that was on the part of the drive that was "reduced"? Does it know to move to another part of the drive before its current home heads to the Phantom Zone? Even that assumes that there is any space left to move to. Attempts to mislead like that are annoying and damage my trust in their other statements.
That's the beauty of Raptor and other FEC methods. Depending on the length and strength of the EC string, you can recover the reamaing data from only part of the string. S0, even if a bank of memory gives out, it should be partially recoverable and (hopefully) corrected and stashed away into a "good" area. The corrupted areas are are "marked", the memory size reduces and the long day wears on.
How effective it will be will depends on how well the manufacturer aligning the FEC coding to the chip's failure mode.
In fact, this is how hard disks operate today, with soft failure modes. The new IBM Power-series CPUs are using the same technology to clean up internal data transfer when stray gamma radiation causes soft failures in the ultra-dense chips.
Cheers. Welcome to the future. What price Mr. Fusion now?
I joyfully correct my reply to just "COOL!" and withdraw the negativeness that I injected into the universe without sufficient cause. Thanks for the details.
By the time they're affordable hard drives will be at like 10TB. ![]()
Should I just hold off on that Drobo purchase & start on the loan application instead?
this sounds expensive but like others have suggested its just a matter of time to lower the cost..
yes a spinning HD will cost less... *FOR NOW* but that has a finite limit of size.. whereas in the same space of the spinning drive you can put a HECK of alot more flash space.. Its just not economical at this time.
I wonder how much free space would be in the standard 3.5 inch drive that the flash type drive would have spare after its electronics to run the drive
Unless hard drives have already reached their limit, they'll increase in capacity faster than flash will. This is what has always happened.
But I feel that the capacity right now is reaching its limit..
1 TB is a large ammount... and for that ammount of data.. for a drive to die like that.. it would not feel good..
Now in the same deal a Flash 1 TB drive would slowly loose space over a timeframe....
A mechanical spinning media while able to hold more.. still has one major point of failure.. the spinning..
I belive that in the next year or two the flash drives will get to a point that they are not a huge cost increase for the lower end (40-80 gigs) and for the computers sold today would be a better option from like dell and such...
You can still add on for extra space with traditional.. but the OS woudl be better off on flash ???
Not sure flash is suited to that.
Also flash is usually very slow compared to a hard drive, although it seems that these guys might have solved that.
Ram gets written to alot.. a swap file is the most written to on a computer i would assume... but the ammount of re-writes it takes would take YEARS to really have a MAJOR impact....
Plus the Flashdrives softwear will do its best to use all the memory in order.. meaning that if you put a file on sector 1 and delete it, then put it back on the drive it wont be put back on sector one.. it would be put on sector 2...
so it could be good ![]()
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |