I've just discovered HDR !!
Looked but cannot find a definitive answer, what would be a recommended range for bracketing, either auto, or manual, to achieve the best results.
Both my digital cameras will only auto bracket maximum 1 stop, is a greater difference recommended. If so, what ?
Also, 3 or 5 or more photo's, is there really a difference ?
You valuable experience is welcomed.
I've been playing with PhotoMatix HDR software, I have Photoshop 7 on my iMac, not CS2/3, not really understanding layers, is it possible to at least simulate HDR using layers ?
Our human's eye can view the dynamic range ( the differentiation of lighting - capable of showing white to black ), approximately 20 F-stops or so. Unlike the human eyes, a digital camera, today technology, can simulate around 10 F-stops or so. Why HDR ? It will add a few more F-stop to your modified picture. Therefore, the arranged HDR picture will look closer to that of what human's eye views.
Any way, you'll need a good camera that support AEB ( Auto Exposure Bracket such as DSLR ). How good your camera's dynaic range is ? www.dpreview.com shows the review for that.
How many pictures? It depends on what kind of picture you're shooting. The number is at least 3 for the minimum ( 1 normal exposure, 1+ f-stop overexposure, and 1- f-stop underexposure ). Nevertheless, HDR shooting is not necessary for including any movement, such as moving cloud or bushes on a windy day, waterfall, river flows, and so on. When you merge those picture files, you'll find out why. I hardly shoot HDR pictures, but occasionally. Besides, a tripod and remote control are the must.
I'd say Photoshop CS2 and CS3 make HDR developing easier. Any way, there're so many software available these days. But, your PC must be be powerful enough since it requires so much RAM memory. Good luck.
I'd say that in the majority of situations, -1,0,+1 is not going to do it. If you can set each bracketed image up to a 1-stop difference, I would use 5 images, at -2,-1,0,+1,+2. That should give you a good range, and often HDRs with more than three images are superior, in my opinion.
Good luck! HDR photography is exciting, that's for certain, but somewhat hard in terms of correctly processing and tone-mapping your images.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |