Missed this live event? No worries! Each Thursday from 11 a.m. to noon PT, we'll give you the chance to chat live with a CNET editor. We'll cover a new topic each week, from cell phones to TVs. Get those burning tech questions ready! Click here for the Ask the Editors Live event calendar.
Thanks to all who joined in on this chat. I appreciate your questions and comments.
Please check out the next Ask the Editor event with Dan Ackerman who will be covering laptops.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-12548_102-0.html?forumID=136&threadID=257577&messageID=2546769
Nice!!! Those are pretty rare....I've driven BMWs since 1997 and I'm never going back!
I'm thinking about a new M Roadster to replace my saab convertible....
Nice thing about BMWs is they make you feel like you're a great driver, even if you aren't Michael Schumacher.
I drive a 1999 BMW Z3 Coupe. I love that car, though it's not the most practical. Very fun to drive, and very cool looking.
I have an Acura TSX at first I thought it was great to have voice commands to control my stereo, climate control, navi, etc... but after several months of use, my wife and I eventually abandoned it... more hassle than its worth.
Is voice command still popular? And are more cars manufactures adapting to voice commands or is it fizzling out?
There are a lot of advances being made in voice command. Engineers are working on making it more flexible and intuitive, so you don't need to memorize a list of commands. I would expect to see more voice command in the future. Ford is launching its new Sync system later this year, which should let you request that your sound system play specific bands. As they improve the systems, more people will find them useful and use them more regularly.
I recently had an error show up on my '05 Mustang where my fuel gauge went to empty. The guys at Ford recommended I put in Chevron mid grade for the next two tanks and before filling up those tanks go into the store and get a bottle of Techron to add to the empty tank. This seemed to clear up the problem. According to Ford it was sulphur on the fuel sensor. Is there really a better brand of gasoline out there or should I just not worry about it and fill up where I can?
I can't really speak to whether Shell is better than Chevron, for example, but gasoline is pretty heavily regulated. A high octane level should make a difference no matter which company it comes from.
But will US embrace diesel?
Are there going to be any hybrid vehicles or other fuel efficient European cars to come out anytime soon in the US?
It depends on what you mean by soon. Mercedes has the E320 and the ML320, while VW has the Touareg. Other diesels may start showing up by 2009 or 2010. Automotive product cycles are long.
hi, i inslalled windows vista in the same partition of my old windows xp, how can i delete the folders windows and program files from the vista installation, windows doesn't letme. acces denied...
Sorry, wrong forum. Please try the Windows Vista forum here:
http://forums.cnet.com/5204-12546_102-0.html?forumID=133
I drive an Audi TT Quattro, love it and get 30+ mpg consistantly, but Audi understands that new technologies in materials will allow Diesel to out perform current engines. But this gets back to the core problem. Its the Oxygen. I keep trying to get a hold of someone so they can see what I did. They keep hitting this ceiling by trying to use the standard atmoshphere.
They now have the greatest LeMans moter on the planet, and its Diesel!
Le Mans is a great showcase for the efficiencies of a diesel engine. Fortunately, ultra low sulfur diesel is mandated for passenger cars in the U.S. now, so that will deal with the emissions issues. We should see more diesels over the next 3 to 5 years.
Premium european car makers (bmw, audi, mercedes-benz) are much much more focused on Diesel technology for the US. Infact, BMW will be bringing diesel variants of popular models, including the X5 and 3 series, to our shores soon. Mercedes-Benz has thier E320 Blutech, and Audi is working on diesel technology too. A diesel equipied 335d BMW can achieve high mpg, low emmissions, and a very very quick ride.
That's true as well, European cars have been using diesel for a long time. Honda also claims it has clean diesel tech that doesn't even need the Bluetec additive system used by Mercedes and Volkswagen. It'll be interesting to see what shows up on our shores. But California and New York will also have to adapt emissions laws for the new diesels for these automakers to find imports worthwhile.
But it's the same old same old. Fuel to air, not fuel to Oxygen. You have to take the Nitrogen out first. It acts as a retardant to combustion.
Efficentcy needs to be measured against 100% oxygen. A 95% efficent furnace in your home is in reality only 17% efficent.
Widespread use of cellulose isn't a problem, unless you consider that most of the higher order life forms are cellulose oxidizers.
The problem is not to oxidize it with any other molecule.
I wish I could comment more on these issues, but I just don't know the science.
Is there a reason why BMW, Mercedes, and other European car manufactures haven't released a hybrid yet? I've seen the concepts but when--and why are they so behind the times?
I think it comes down to culture more than anything. European car makers are a little more conservative than Asian manufacturers, and less likely to jump on a new technology. Also, in Europe they are used to building cars with very small engines compared to what we get in the US, so they are already economical, and have less of a need for hybrids.
You said that "if you have to deal with hills, the hybrid can increase efficiency."
Can you further go into details about increase efficiency. Does the electric side of the motor help assist in driving up hills? Just need a little more clarification on when the electric motor does actually kick in to help save fuel...
Sure, the hybrid system will kick in when you are going up the hills. With a non-hybrid system, the engine would shoot more gas through the cylinders to produce the extra power needed to get up the hills. With a hybrid, the electric motors provide the extra boost. You make up some of that energy expended when you go down the other side of the hill, with regen braking putting electricity back into the batteries.
You take one cellulose molecule to 3 O2 molecules and you get lots of energy released. Creating only CO2 and water. If cellulose is one of the top 5 most abundent molecules on the planet, why isn't that the fuel. And it is paart of the closed carbon cycle, and not a polutant. Only fossil fuel carbon is a bad thing. The reason is no one ever changed the O2 levels to take advantage of cellulose
There is plenty of research going on into cellulose fuels. Researchers have to deal with the same issues they deal with other alt fuels: how efficiently can it burn, what's the best source, how much energy will it produce, and will there be consequences to widespread use?
Since hybrid cars run on the electric during stop and go driving, would it be best to stick with a non-hybrid car if 90% of your driving is on the highway?
Your driving habits are a big consideration if you're looking into hybrids. If you're doing a lot of high speed freeway driving, definitely consider a car with a 6 speed transmission. Plus, any small displacement engine should do as well as a hybrid on flat terrain at freeway or highway speeds. But if you have to deal with hills, the hybrid can increase efficiency.
I frequently travel on business to US and European cities and deal with rental cars. European cities are notoriously difficult to navigate. I would like to have a portable, simple device that would work in cars on multiple continents. Alternatively, I could be satisfied with GPS antenna only unit that can communicate with my GSM T-Mobile MDA phone via Bluetooth and allow me to use car 12V plug for only one device. What would You recommend ?
Thank You, Jerzy
For travel, I would recommend a dedicated portable nav device from Garmin or TomTom. You will have to buy the European maps, which are going to be expensive. Or you could buy one of those devices with the European maps, then buy the US maps separately, depending on your needs. Portable antennas can present hassles due to connectivity issues and having to load apps and maps onto your phone.
I've heard that Toyota is planning on revamping their Prius model to vastly inprove energy efficiency, possibly making it a plug-in, changing to a Li-Ion battery and even adding solar panels on the top to help recharge the battery. What information have you heard about the Toyota Prius 2010 redesign?
Well, I've heard from Toyota that they won't confirm a 2010 model upgrade. Toyota engineers don't want to be held to a timeline, as they want to incorporate the best tech they can. However, I'm sure Toyota marketing has a different view point. Also, Toyota showed off a concept at last Winter's auto shows that looks like a new generation Prius. New battery tech seems likely, as there have been big improvements. I'm sure plug-in is under consideration, but Toyota has only admitted to researching it. Solar panels seem less likely. Right now, though, there is only speculation.
Ok, I've got another. My 2004 SAAB 9-3 was cut off from OnStar services a few months ago becuase of the analog-digital switch. (even though GM knew about this as early as 2002). My other car, a 2007 BMW X5, uses a similar, (and superior) system called BMW Assist. Is this based on the most current digital system?
(Forkboy: No. ABS helps stopping distances and vehicle control in all conditions)
Yes, BMW Assist works on a digital cellular standard. You won't get it cut off due to a change from analog.
Seeing as it is called oxidation, in all of this debate, when have you ever heard of anyone ever dealing with the oxygen side of the formula? I have radical process at 40% This changes combustion more than anyone ever has, and it can use cast magnets to do it, so it requires no energy input other than casting the fields.
Oxygenating gasoline definitely contributes to a cleaner burn. But I'm not knowledgable about how magnets can oxygenate gasoline.
I recently heard a conversation between automotive experts where it was said that ABS doesn't really improve braking distances in dry conditions, but is really more for wet conditions and for maintaining directional stability in dry. Is this an accurate assessment of ABS?
I have never heard that ABS doesn't help in dry conditions. Where it definitely does help is maintaining driver control over the vehicle, in wet or dry. If you're skidding, you can't effectively maneuver. With ABS, you still have control over steering when the car is under hard braking.
ok, I've got a question.
The NHTSA has proposed (and passed, I believe) a new requirement for passenger vehicles to have Electronic Stability Program standard in a few years. What vehicles are excepted? I believe very heavy vehicles are, but I'm not sure.
Thanks
I believe commercial vehicles will have a different standard (as they do in most regulations). But I haven't verified that.
Hi, I'm Wayne Cunningham, senior editor of CNET Car Tech, here to answer your questions about car technology.
Welcome to the Ask the Editors Live! In order to submit a question to our editor, we ask that you either log in with your current CNET account or register with us. Registration is free and easy- sign up now and join in on the discussion!