Aesthetics are always subjective, but you picked a Range Rover-gilled, Taurus-mouthed Jaguar over the Aston Martin Vantage? I could almost pardon you for selecting the S2000 over a lot of other droptops that I think have far more character and charisma than that bland-looking Honda, but selecting the derivative Jag over the stunning, balanced baby Aston...you really must insist on...(cough)..."testing" one of these so you can correct this injustice the next time you make up one of these lists. And leaving off the Z06, which you DID test...again, I guess I just don't understand you (so-called) "car guys" over there at CNET.
http://reviews.cnet.com/4326-10895_7-6578424.html?tag=promo
1. Pontiac Aztec
2. Chevy Avalanche truck
3. Hummer
4. Chevy Malibu
5. Mitsubishi Endeavor
6. Mercedes R350
7. Honda Element
8. Subaru Baja
9. Chrysler 300/Magnum
10. Citroen DS
Oh, sorry about that. I thought it was a list for "The Worst Looking Cars", or in other words, "God, what were they thinking when they designed this?" These cars are proof that you can have several different designers working on designing one car, and no one knows what the other is doing until all the various parts get assembled.
I didn't take this photo, but my friend Brian Konoske did.
check it out:
PHOTO 1
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/210/2982/1600/audi_2.jpg
PHOTO 2
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/210/2982/1600/audi_1.jpg
He's a good photographer, no?!
Regards, Ryan
well as a car lover, i have always been impressed by BMW's cars. these cars really look good in the interior and the exterior. Not to mention other things like the bmw m3 gtr. So BMW cars are shoo-in in my list.
bmw's are nice but the interior haven't changed much since the 90's
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |