Missed this live event? No worries! Each Thursday from 11 a.m. to noon PT, we'll give you the chance to chat live with a CNET editor. We'll cover a new topic each week, from cell phones to TVs. Get those tech questions ready! Click here for the Ask the Editor Live event calendar.
Sorry I couldn't get to all the questions, but thanks for writing anyway. Next week 6/29 is John Falcone with Home Audio/Theater.
Here's the place to be:
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-12548_102-0.html?forumID=136&threadID=253352&messageID=2520602
Thanks,
Katz
...(I assume you mean TVs). If you mean 1080p TV sources, you'll be waiting a long time.
Is a 720p or 1080i plasma set with 10,000:1 contrast better than a 1080p plasma set with 5000:1 contrast?
...as I said, contrast ratio specs are inflated and unreliable. But all things being equal, I would take the non-1080p version because I'd assume the 10,000:1 spec implied a better black level. And if that was all the information I had, I'd probably not buy until I knew more.
Can the new Samsung LCD's zoom SD prograaming? I know Sony can but the old Samsungs could not. I am looking at the 40" 4061 or 4065 T models.
...in that they have aspect ratio modes entitled "Zoom" that are designed to fill the screen with standard-def programming. On those sets you can also adjust the zoomed image vertically, to make a ticker more or less-visible for example.
I am planning to buy a new HDTV 46"+ but I also want to use it as a computer monitor. Is there any model you recommend for both funtions? Thank you.
...as PC monitors, but I've found that LCDs in general outperform plasmas for PC duty. First, the benefits of 1080p res (more common on LCD) are more visible with a PC desktop. Second, many plasmas don't offer dedicated PC inputs. I've had good luck with samsung and vizio and Sony LCDs as PC monitors...see the reviews for details. Also remember you can usually go in via HDMI with a DVI adapter and the quality usually beats the analog VGA input.
What's the difference between 1080i and 1080p?
...that helps explain:
http://www.cnet.com/4520-7874_1-5137915-1.html?tag=main.understand
What is the better size if the TV will be 10'-11' from the viewer? It's very difficult to tell in a store because there is a big difference between watching a program for 10 minutes vs. 3 hours.
If you can afford the 50, go for it. At 10 feet if you have a 42 you might find yourself wishing for a larger TV soon...with a 50 that won't be (as much:) of a problem.
...as long as the monitor's inputs match the cable box's outputs, you're golden.
I want a HDTV, but I have heard SDTV is horrible on HDTV sets. Since the amount of content for SDTV out weighs the HDTV content I imagine I will spend 80% of my time on SDTV content. Is there any HDTV that shows SDTV as good as my tried and true set?
...usually HDTVs are larger than standard TVs, and if you blow up a standard-def image to 42 inches or larger, it's gonna look a lot worse than 27 inches. That said, some HDTVs outperform others with standard-def sources. It's important to remember, however, that if you're watching standard-def channels via a cable or satellite box and the box upconverts everything to 1080i or 720p, then the TV's processing makes no difference. Regardless, SD is going to look markedly worse than HD, but most don't find it unwatchable.
how big of a part does the brand of a HDTV play in picture quality. if you have a 32" sony 720p and a 32" polaroid 720p, the resolution on paper is the same, would it also be safe to say they are pretty much the same in picture quality?
...at least to my eyes. Many people are perfectly satisfied regardless of their HDTV brand (hey, it looks a lot better than their old TV) but there's much more to a TV's PQ than the resolution spec. Sony sets (for example) get good reviews because their picture quality characteristics beyond rez..namely color, black levels, video processing, etc, are better than average. If these manufs consistently produce better performers, they get a good rep and become a respected brand.
i'm between a 32 inch vizio VX32L and a westinghouse SK-32H240S. Which is the higher quality set for someone with a tight budget and can only spend less than 700?
...having not seen the "Westy." But I think the VX32L is a great value.
I know the answer, but I'd love your input. I currently have a 40" Samsung LN-S4095D (1080P LCD). Its contrast is great, but black levels leave something to be desired. I'm thinking of picking up a Pioneer PDP-5080HD, from Pio's new line of 8th gen plasmas. It's 1366x768, which would be a step down in resolution, but honestly - the color saturation and black levels of this set are simply stunning, even better than the current (and highly rated) Pio PRO FH-D1 (which is a 1080p set). This would be going in a bedroom roughly 13x13. Should I be worried about the step down in resolution? I understand resolution isn't nearly as important as saturation, accuracy and black levels (temperature), and this television is panning out to be the best plasma of 2007 in all of those factors... but it's not 1080p. I'm a big AVS poster, and am the first to point out to friends and family that one must be quite close to a panel to see the benefits of 1080p, but (when it comes to my own money) I'm a bit apprehensive of buying a next-gen panel (that is 50 inches) without 1920x1080 res. I will be mostly viewing 1080p material - Blu-Ray films, PS3 gaming, downloaded 1080P feeds from Japan and some digital cable. Is this a valid concern, purchasing "old tech"? The upcoming PDP-5010HD, which will be 1080P, is far out of my price range. Thanks for your advice.
...I can't say for sure, but I wouldn't feel any apprehension if I were you about trading a million or so pixels for better blacks and color saturation. The new 5080's looked great in the demo I saw at CES, and I expect them to be among the best-performing HD sets available this year. And if plasma is "old tech," it's still good tech in my experience.
What does an upconverting DVD player do for an HDTV? Is it necessary to buy an upconverting DVD player?
...the upconverter in the TV itself. Its effectiveness depends on the performance of the TV's upconverter, but there's usually a slight improvement. I wouldn't call an upconverting DVD player a necessity.
in your opinion - what is the time line for most of the cable stations to go HD and who is the best provider of high def programming.
but I think providers near big metro areas are most inclined to go HD because they have more competition. The best provider I've used is Dish Network, but local cable is sometimes better (not by me though) and I've heard Fios TV is great for HD picture quality, if you're lucky enough to have access to it.
My uncle's sony HD LCD set gets a little blurry when the image on screen is fast moving. Is this a common issue with LCD sets and when will it be a thing of the past?
...especially on brand-name sets. For many viewers it's already a thing of the past. Conversely, sharp-eyed viewers can see blurring if they look closely on some of todays LCD sets. I can't say when it'll be a thing of the past on LCD, but it's not an issue with other TV techs, and 120Hz sets promise to eradicate it. I'll know more when I can test some of the new 120Hz panels.
If most of my viewing is watching HD programing form Directv should I get a 1080p or 720p flat panel? Also do any networks braodcast in 1080p yet and when do you think they all will?
...again see my size caveats below. And no network does 1080p yet, and I don't think any will for years to come. Let's say 2012, if that.
Do you feel that BluRay or HD-DVD will be worthwhile in 3 years? With prospects of digital distribution for movies, even if its not in 1080p, a smart buyer might wonder if either of these technologies ever really will take off. If you think it is worth it, what the best choice?
...but I think H-wood has a vested interest in physical media for the time being. I expect player for both formats (assuming HD DVD survives) to be about half the price they are now in 2008 (say $200), at which point they do become worth it considering you get an upconverting DVD player for "free." So yeah, in three years definitely. I see digital distributino taking longer than that. And Blu-ray would be my choice now, just because HD DVD has less of a movie selection.
...(I assume you mean TVs). If you mean 1080p TV sources, you'll be waiting a long time.
Our HDTV is an early Sony 40-inch crt with Component inputs but no HDMI jack. What DVD player can I buy that gives upsampled output through the Component jacks?
...is actually not allowed on "official' DVD players (those with the DVD logo), so it's very uncommon. We've reviewed some Helios or NuoNeo units that can do it, but that's about it.
Helios
http://reviews.cnet.com/video-players-and-recorders/helios-hvd2085/4505-6463_7-31836604.html?tag=prod.txt.8
The most common complaint on the 42" Sharp LCD is that one has to calibrate.... How do I do this?
...beyond the standard user menu is very difficult. But the user menu settings can give you a better pic if you turn down the backlight and contrast and choose Low CT. I haven't reviewed the 42, but I posted a 32-inch Sharp review that has some picture settings you can start with.
I've read many of your HDTV reviews and am leaning toward getting the XBR 52' lcd. Do you see the price going down in 2 months in the 2500$ range? I've also looked at Pioneer plasmas and wonder what the difference is between playing blu ray or ps3 games on a 720p plasma vs. a 1080p lcd. I've heard that although the Pioneer 5070HD is 720p, it still looks better than the Sony. What do you suggest in the 2500$/greater than 50 inch category (I don't mind waiting 2 months if the prices go down).
...on the 52-inch Sony I predict. Too high of a demand for those.
I'd recommend the Pioneer plasma all things considered (that's why it's still the EC). Again, the diff between 1080p and 720p at those screen sizes is a function of seating distance...not a big one overall though.
Hi David,
I would like to know how far out in the future are affordable LCD TV's with LED backlighting and also OLED TV's? Also, for the money, are Sony's Bravia XBR LCD TV's worth the high prices?
Thanks!
Carl
OLED: available 2008, affordable 2010
LED backlight: same
As for Bravia, it depends on the model. I haven't reviewed the new 2007 models, but I liked the 2006's a lot. They've since been surpassed by the Samsung LN-T4665F though.
Will company's like Sony and Samsung continue to make HD CRT sets? It's becoming increasingly harder to find these sets in stores especially in larger set sizes. Do you know their plans for future sets?
Check out this discussion:
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-7596_102-0.html?forumID=60&threadID=250694&messageID=2504631
I am planning on buying a new sony lcd for use with a xbox 360 elite. Should I wait for the new models with faster refresh rates?
...unless you can see blurring with the current sets. The 120Hz Sonys will be significantly more expensive than current models, and I can't say one way or the other whether they'll outperform current sets in terms of blurring for games.
May not be the right question for this forum... My apologies! Who do I go with for installation if I buy my set online? Also, the moment I say, the installation is on a brick wall over the fireplace, they say no.... any reasons why? Also, is Sharp the LCD pioneer?
That's a good question I'm ill-equipped to answer. I'd ask around at a hi-fi store or even a best buy of they can recc. area installers. Fireplace...no idea. Guess it's more dangerous. BTW, do you really want to look UP at the TV? AFAIK, Sharp was one of the first to develop big-screen LCDs for sale to consumers and was definitely among the first to supply LCD screens for other uses. So I guess that makes them a pioneer.
For all the "when will you review ___?" Q's rest assured I've asked manufs to send me the models asap. The 80 series Pioneers are at the top of my list. Samsung LED DLPs, Panny 1080p 50's, Samsung 5084...I've asked the manufs for all of them. It's unfortunately up to them when they want to send the sets to review.
What is the best way to record over the air HDTV broadcasts?
I do have access to relatively old PC's that might make good HDTV tuners, with the appropriate add-in cards....They could sit by the TV and be a digital recorder...
If you have not done this article already, it would be nice to have one on the best way to make an HDTV DVR/Tivo-like device....
Please see below. I think a cheap tuner card will work well but you'll need a somewhat current system to take full advantage.
How much should we adjust your ratings down when comparing a 2006 rating against a 2007 rating? I'm trying to decide between the 2006 Pioneers and the 2007 Panasonic or Samsumg.
And I still think the 5070HD can hold its own against the Panny 50PX77U or the Samsung 5064, with the exception of the Panny's glare-fighting screen. I am excited to check out the latest Pioneer but it's going to be expensive.
I purchased a samsung hls5087w in the fall. It took a while to get the color right but now the picture looks great. However, recently I have noticed the TV is getting some horribe user reviews. Most of the complaints have to do with component failure. Should I have gone with the sony Vega (3 lcd) or did I make the right choice with DLP?
I'll say off the bat we don't test for long-term use here, so I can't really answer that question with authority. But I know a few people who've owned DLP for years and not had any issues.
Which plasma am I better off spending my money on:
Panasonic TH-50PX77U or the 75U? Is there a major difference between the two?
Also, through some of the research I have done, plasma(over LCD) seems to be the way to go for watching sports, correct?
...which I really like. Other than that the two should have very similar PQ, and the price diff is like $100 at some places. I'd take the 77U myself.
Some people complain of blurring during motion on some LCDs, but many don't notice it. Also, newer LCDs have much less blurring during fast motion...I personally think the blur thing is also overstated between the two tech, but I'd take plasma for other reasons (uniformity, off-angle, price/size).
Will LED backlighting make a big difference in image quality--brightness, color accuracy, contrast, etc.
The few LED backlit LCD's I've seen can produce a very deep black, and alsso looked a bit more vibrant color-wise. The specs certainly indicate LED-backlit sets will improve upon current LCD backlight tech. Then again they'll be quite expensive, which is the main reason they haven't come out in force yet beyond super-expensive models like the Sony Qualia (now discontinued).
Why is it that some HDTV channels appear to look better than others? Some appear more grainy than others while others seem to be a bit more blurry. As far as I can tell, they're all outputting in 1080i and I know my TV's pretty decent (Sony XBR2)
Also, what's the deal with OLED TV's? I hear so much about how they're so great, but what are they? What advantages do they have over traditional LCD/Plasma TVs?
It's all about the source. Some networks, like Discovery HD and HD Net, pay special attention to try to get the very best quality, so they usually look the best regardless of your provider (cable, sat, etc). But some networks don't have as consistent of a source. Also, many cable and satellite companies privide more bandwidth to some channels (typically pay-per-view, local sports) and so they look better.
For OLED, I'll refer you here:
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6741419-1.html
I know that this question has been asked a million times, but I bought a HD tv in January, a Toshiba 42" plasma. I was wondering is 1080P tv that big of a difference? Should I wait till the prices come down? Or is not the best time too buy one?
Thanks in advance
...but overall it's not that big of a difference to most people (see reply below). If you'd rather save a couple hundred than be watching TV, you'll get better prices closer to the holidays, or by buying last year's model now.
What is a good TV that is between 20" and 30" with an ATSC tuner that is fairly cheap? Also, what is the importance of the ATSC tuner? (my friend recommend that I get a TV with that tuner)
...sizes at the moment, so I can't say firsthand. If I were buying a smaller set I'd probably get the 26-inch version of the Samsung I reviewed recently, model LN-T2653H, or if I wanted to spend less, the Vizio. The tuner is great if you don't have cable connected...otherwise it's not that useful.
Another question....I have no idea if I can even get an HDTV signal over my 20 year old giant TV antenna in my attic...
It uses that old two wire TV antenna wire to go down into the house, screwed into two leads on the old antenna...
I was thinking of taking that, attaching RG6 to it, and then test it with an over the air HDTV tuner to see if it can even get a signal....and then see how things look.
If that worked, I would probably return the HDTV tuner, and then buy a PC HDTV tuner card and use something like Snapstreams Beyond TV...
http://www.snapstream.com/products/beyondtv/
Unless you have a better method to record over the air digital broadcasts....
it's all about placement with OTA HD. The first step is definitely finding out if you can get a signal, and using the existing antenna is what I always recc. to try first.
What are the current high numbers for LCD contrast ratios?
...I think Samsung is advertising in the neighborhood of 20,000:1. I honestly don't keep close track of manuf CR specs because they're often very inflated and don't give an accurate picture of real-world performance (black level especially).
Hey David, I currently have a PS3 and XBox 360. Should I still consider buying a cheaper 720p HDTV plasma, for instance, or should I go ahead and shop for something that supports 1080p? I don't want to spend a thousand dollars more than I need to if the differences are not noticeable.
In my experience, you'll want a 50-inch or larger screen to BEGIN to see the benefits of 1080p at a normal seating distance (say 2x the screen's diagonal). If you sit very close, say 1.5x the diagonal, then you might see a benefit from 1080p, but for the vast majority of people a non-1080p set is perfectly fine at sub-50-inch sizes, even for the highest-rez sources.
I am a newbie. I have been looking for about a year. Istill can't figure out the best way to go in a 46" 50" range. LCD or Plasma
Suggestions?
http://reviews.cnet.com/4323-6531_7-6509132.html?tag=txt
My faves from each camp currently are the Samsung LN-T4665F and the Pioneer PDP-5070HD.
I really don't think so. OLED is at least a year out before the sets come in sizes that benefit home theater (at least 30 inches plus) and even then they'll be really expensive. But I wouldn't be surprised if Sony was first.
Will LCD tv contrast ratios get any better soon?
...the stated contrast ratios for LCDs are already really high for a lot of models. I'm sure models next year will climb higher, but that could just mean they're brighter...the best way to achieve a high contrast ratio is not with high brightness, but with deep blacks. And the best black-level LCDs are already surpassing plasma (the new Pioneers, which I haven't tsted yet, notwithstandint).
I've got an HDTV that I have not tested with a regular UHF antennae. Assuming I can get digital broadcasts over an old, large TV antennae, I want a way to record TV...
I was looking at a program like Beyond TV, but don't know how well a setup with a "regular" antenna, and a PC as an HDTV tuner would work...
What is the best way to record over the air broadcasts of HDTV?
At the moment nobody really makes an affordable set-top for recording HDTV over the air, so unless you get a satellite DVR (Dish or DirecTV) the best way is with a PC card. I haven't tested too many of them, but from whathave seen the PC card's antenna connections work as well as a set-top reception-wise. And you can get some recording cards for cheap.