Drop, charge, and lose the cords
Community Newsletter: Q&A: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista?
- 2/1/07 6:36 PM
2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista?
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) - 2/1/07 6:36 PM
Question:
I'm running Windows 98 on my Compaq Presario desktop, but I have been thinking about upgrading. Some people have suggested I upgrade to Windows XP, while others have said to wait for Vista to come out and then get that. Which do you suggest I do? Will I have problems when I do an upgrade? Will the programs I have on my current computer not run or become problems when I upgrade? Thanks!
Submitted by: Ruth B.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Hi Ruth,
The first thing that came to mind upon reading your question was Why now? What made you start "thinking about upgrading" at this particular juncture in time? Was it all the hype surrounding the release of Windows Vista? Or have you been experiencing performance and/or security issues with your Presario that led you to entertain the possibility of an upgrade?
Regardless of what triggered your interest in upgrading your computer, you need to ask yourself several questions: Does my hardware meet the minimum system requirements for installing Windows XP or Windows Vista?
Unless your Presario is less than five years old and Windows 98 is in it because of personal preference, it is safe to assume that either your operating system came installed in your desktop at the time of purchase, or that you upgraded a Windows 95 machine to Windows 98. In either case, your hardware might be the determining factor on whether or not you will be able to upgrade to a newer operating system. And you might have less of a choice than you might suspect.
According to Microsoft, the minimum System Requirements for Windows XP SP2 are:
• 233 megahertz (MHz) processor
• 64 megabytes (MB) of RAM
• 1.8 GB of available hard disk space during installation
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sp2/sysreqs.mspx
To determine whether your desktop meets these minimum requirements:
1. Click the START button;
2. Right-click My Computer, then click Properties on the drop-down menu.
3. On the General tab, under Computer, you should see your Presario's processor speed and RAM listed.
To get a more detailed profile of your system, download and run the Belarc Advisor utility. It is compatible with Windows 98:
http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html
Realize that while Microsoft claims you can run Windows XP with 64 MB of RAM, that figure simply won't cut it in the real world. The reason is that your operating system will not be running in isolation. Your antivirus and antispyware software, firewall, web browser, productivity suites, media players, etc. will also be using your system's resources. If your computer has insufficient memory, it will crash. To prevent memory related problems, the recommended amount of memory for computers running XP is 512 MB of RAM.
And here you might encounter the first roadblock. If the maximum amount of memory your Presario can handle is less than 512 MB, you can rule out upgrading your machine. That is, unless by "upgrading" you mean getting a new, 2007 model.
You can find out the maximum memory your desktop can handle by contacting Hewlett-Packard Customer Support and requesting the specifications of your particular Presario model:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/siteHomeC?lc=en&cc=us
Alternatively, you can visit Crucial.com (http://www.crucial.com/) and either scan your system or use the Memory Advisor Tool to find this information.
In all likelihood, your processor exceeds the minimum requirements for Windows XP. But anything less than a Pentium II should be considered an 8-track player in the age of the iPod, and reason enough to forget about upgrading. It ain't happening.
For the sake of completeness, let's consider Microsoft's Recommended System Requirements for Windows Vista Home Basic, arguably a glorified (and prettier) version of Windows XP Home Edition, and the entry-level member of the Vista family:
• 1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
• 512 MB of system memory
• 20 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB of available space
• Support for DirectX 9 graphics and 32 MB of graphics memory
• DVD-ROM drive
• Audio Output
• Internet access
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/editions/default.mspx
Quite a jump from the minimum requirements for Windows XP! It is extremely unlikely that your present hardware configuration comes even close to meeting the above requirements.
And remember, these are Microsoft's suggestions, which do not necessarily correlate with life in the real world. Recommended minimum memory for the Vista operating system is 1 GB of RAM. A graphics card with a minimum of 128 MB memory is also recommended.
Will I need to replace any other components or peripherals?
Adding memory is one thing. But if your graphics card, sound card, and/or Ethernet card are incompatible with your new operating system, you might need to spend so much money on new components that you might be better served buying a new computer. Similarly, peripherals such as printers and scanners that worked flawlessly in a Windows 98 environment might not work with Windows XP without updated drivers - if at all.
To check for other potential hardware issues, you can run the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor utility:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/upgrading/advisor.mspx
It checks your system for both hardware and software that might be incompatible with Windows XP.
(Note: This tool is designed to test compatibility with Windows XP Professional Edition, an operating system with slightly higher minimum requirements than its Home counterpart. Still, it should give you a good idea as to potential issues. The Windows XP home page has an upgrade advisor tool, but it tests compatibility with Vista.)
What about software compatibility?
If your hardware checks out, you have to consider the issue of software compatibility. As stated above, the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor will identify software that is incompatible with the new operating system. Updating to newer, "Designed for XP" versions of the programs might be just what the doctor ordered. Of course, this means incurring additional expenses.
In some cases, programs that ran in Windows 98 will be compatible with Windows XP, though they might experience loss of functionality. Others might work erratically in the new environment. In the latter case, Windows XP will allow you to run the problematic software in an environment that mimics that of Windows 98:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/helpandsupport/learnmore/tips/daniels1.mspx
Software and driver compatibility issues arise when upgrading from any operating system to another. What must be taken into account here is how much updating or upgrading your software will add to the cost of upgrading your operating system. The amount can be considerable.
Assuming I can upgrade to Windows XP, should you do it, even if the cost is reasonable?
Probably not.
Here's why: There is a good chance that in upgrading your Presario's hardware, you will reach the functional limits of your system. In other words, you might not be able to add any more memory or another drive. And upgrading your sound or graphics card at a later date, if at all possible, might necessitate a different motherboard, which in turn might require a different type of memory, and so on. That sound you just heard was the sound of cash registers going wild.
Even if it only costs you $150-$200 to make your Presario Windows XP-compatible, you are backing yourself into a corner.
For one thing, there's already a new operating system out to replace Windows XP, and developers will devote their energy to creating software that takes advantage of the newest version of Windows. In addition, the heavier demands of newer applications might cause the performance of your revamped Presario to be no better than what it was when you were running Windows 98.
Performance might actually worsen, for meeting the aforementioned demands will probably require your Presario to run full speed ahead, all the time. The increased work load and inevitable wear-and-tear will shorten the useful life of what is already a veteran system. Better to put that money toward a new PC or notebook.
You can expect major computer manufacturers to come up with very attractive offers over the coming weeks, in an effort to promote the switch to Vista. This might be a good time to buy a new toy! (New desktops and laptops will come with Windows Vista. Windows XP is no longer installed in new computers.)
Final thoughts:
If what led you to ponder an upgrade was a recent decrease in the performance of your computer, consider scanning it for spyware and virus infections. If everything comes clean, the decrease in performance might be related to the demands of recently installed programs. If you don't want to invest in a new computer right away, try adding more memory, if possible.
I encourage anyone currently running Windows XP and wondering whether or not to upgrade to Windows Vista to read Robert Vamosi's That $200 Windows XP service pack called Vista
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6689143.html
Good luck!
Submitted by: Miguel K. of Columbus, Ohio
Honorable mentions
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) - 2/1/07 6:41 PM
In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Answer:
Ruth, if you are running Windows 98, it is highly likely (just about certain) that the computer does not meet the hardware requirements to run Vista, which makes the question of upgrading to Vista moot, since you probably can’t. There is even a possibility that you can’t reasonably upgrade to Windows XP.
I would not recommend that you consider Windows XP unless the computer is at least a Pentium II, about 350 Megahertz or faster, with at least 256 megabytes of memory and at least about a 40 gigabyte hard drive.
I would not recommend that you consider Vista unless the computer is at least a Pentium III, about 800 Megahertz or faster, with at least 512 megabytes of memory and at least about an 80 gigabyte hard drive.
These are not the official Microsoft specifications for XP or Vista, but are my own based on experience. However, they are reasonable approximate minimums. Certainly you could upgrade the hard drive or memory of your system, and XP can be installed on systems with lower specifications than this, but I wouldn’t advise it.
But that said, if you are below these specifications, indeed even if you just slightly above these specifications, you have to ask whether or not the money you will spend to upgrade would not be better spent on a new computer. A copy of just Windows XP Home Upgrade is about $100 just by itself, not to even mention a memory or disk upgrade, and for $500 or so you could probably get a whole new PC with Vista or XP preinstalled. If the total cost of installing XP on what might now be a 7-year old computer is 40% of the cost of a brand new computer with Vista installed, you need to give economic feasibility, and not just technical feasibility, some serious consideration.
Now, however, not knowing exactly what machine you have, and for the benefit of others in a similar situation but perhaps with a later machine, let’s continue the discussion.
If you did want to upgrade to Vista, keep in mind also that aside from memory, processor and disk drive, virtually no machine currently running Windows 98 will have a video card that will run Vista’s new user interface (called Aero, and/or Glass ... I’ll refer to it as “AG” (Aero Glass) for short). So now you are looking at possibly spending money to upgrade OS, Memory, Disk Drive and Video card. And since you are running Windows 98, you can’t use the upgrade version of Vista, you would have to use the “full version”, which is $200 even for the low-end Home Basic version. Technical feasibility aside, the economics of such an upgrade compared to buying a new computer just look worse and worse and worse. The minimum OS for using the Vista upgrade version is Windows 2000. To run AG, you need a video card with “Pixel Shader 2” and at least 128MB of video memory. This means, roughly, that a machine made or bought before about 2004 is going to need significant hardware upgrades to be a reasonable Vista upgrade candidate. And even some machines made in 2006 ... indeed some machines sold as recently as December of 2006 (last month) are incapable of running AG.
Anyone considering such an upgrade should download and run Microsofts “Vista Upgrade Advisor” (http://www.Microsoft.com/Vista) , which will analyze their system and tell them what their options are and what hardware upgrades would be required to run Vista.
If you are going to buy a new computer, or if you are going to buy a copy of Vista for upgrade, there are 4 versions available at retail: Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate. Home Basic should be shunned. It is so totally stripped down that it doesn’t even include the AG interface, or really any other Vista features. Frankly, you would probably be better off with XP Home than with Home Basic.
Although Vista was introduced on January 30th, at this time, you may still find PCs that come with XP for sale in stores. If you buy a new PC preloaded with XP before March 15th, you MAY be eligible for a free upgrade to Vista (but this depends on the particular machine and the policies of the manufacturer and/or the store where you buy it, it’s not absolutely automatic across the board). Some people consider this to be the best option, because in fact you may not like Vista, and this might give you both OS’. But buying such a machine would also mean that you had to do the upgrade yourself (or perhaps pay to have it done).
Very importantly in such a case, note that if you buy such a machine that only has XP Home, then the upgrade is only to the terrible Vista Home Basic version and it’s not free, you have to pay for it (although you do get a significant discount). Therefore, if you look for a machine with XP preloaded and a free Vista upgrade before March 15th, you really want to find one that comes with XP Media Center instead of XP Home, so that your Vista upgrade is to Home Premium and is also likely free. However, such machines have mostly already disappeared and may be hard to find.
As for problems, it is possible that some of your software won’t be supported by Vista, and also that some of your hardware won’t be supported by Vista. There are potential hardware issues with both internal hardware such as sound or video cards, and external hardware such as printers or scanners. The Vista Upgrade Advisor will be able to give you information on both hardware and software that is or that may be incompatible with Vista. However, if the system is very old, as yours likely is, then you might find it necessary to replace or upgrade some of your software or hardware. And since in your case you can’t do an upgrade to Vista (e.g. you can’t use an upgrade version of Vista from Windows 98), you will be forced to reinstall all of the software from the original installation media. The only way that you might escape that would be to upgrade not to Vista, but to XP, where an upgrade remains an option.
Ruth, I hope that this has been helpful, and while you didn’t give the model number or processor of your computer, I suspect that it’s sufficiently old that your best option, at this point, is not an OS upgrade but rather an entirely new PC preloaded with Vista or possibly even XP Media Center Edition.
Submitted by: Barry W. of North Canton, Ohio
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Ruth B.,
There are a lot of unanswered questions in your quest to know which is the best way to upgrade.
1. How old is the model of Presario that you are talking about
2. What is the current processor speed
3. How much memory is currently available in the system that you have
4. What is the current size of your hard drive
5. Do you have an external hard drive for backup of your current system
6. What types of programs do you use the most on your computer, and how old are the versions [do you have any updates in the last few years]
The reasons for those basic questions is as follows:
With Vista coming out as of January 31, 2007 the hardware requirements of the computer are such that if you don’t at least have a 2.8 GHz processor then the speed of your computer will really not be sufficient to match the capabilities of the operating system that you are thinking about moving to.
If you only have about 256 MB of Ram that is not going to be sufficient enough to run Vista… personally for Vista I would say 1 MB of Ram… I know from experience with XP that it has to have 256 MB of Ram just to install the operating system and once that is done, if you don’t add at least and additional 256 MB of RAM then it runs very slow and takes longer for some of your memory intensive programs to load.
As for the HDD size, while we are still talking about an installation of less than 10 GB on the HDD [for XP or Vista], a 20 GB drive will fill up very fast, once you start reinstalling programs and saving information. In addition, you have those Windows files that add to the size of your drive and you can see where a smaller drive just does not fit the bill. Would recommend anything from a 60 to 80 GB drive for the primary drive on the system, that way if you choose to [have someone to assist you] partitioning the drive, you would then have to 30 GB HDD with one being the primary Windows drive and the second being the drive where you could load most of your programs without worry.
From a cost factor, you can get an external HDD drive to back up you current [or future] drive that will cost you pennies per MB and will provide a solid foundation in the event that there is a system crash, or issues, when you decide to change the operating system on your computer. Remember – unless you don’t care what is lost during the installation of the new operating system, is always wise to back up you important information so that you can have that information to use once the new operating system is installed. The other good point about having a back-up external HDD is that once you have completed the upgrading of the operating system, you can now back up the new operating system and your files to the HDD in the event that there is a crash in the future, and your information is safely secured in the external drive, and can be recovered. [NOTE: Have seen/sold 100 GB External HDD for less than $100.00 – worth every penny when your system crashes]
If you are like me and not able to go out and get every new program that comes out, then I would recommend upgrading to XP over Vista… why????? I personally got an e-mail from Intuit – the makers of the Quicken, QuickBooks, TurboTax and other programs – in the last week where the essence of the e-mail was that for all non-2007 versions of their product that they would not be supported, and ‘might not’ work properly with Windows Vista and asked you to upgrade from your current version of their program to the 2007 version… Don’t know about you, but I don’t have the kind of money to just go out and upgrade all the ‘important’ programs that I use, just to move to a new operating system.
In conclusion would just say this – While it may seem a little crazy to add some ram and get an external hard drive and upgrade to Windows XP, that’s a very far cry from the expense that you have to make in terms of getting a machine that is Vista Ready and then purchasing all of the software that will work with the program itself. But being a working person, on a budget, that little bit of change can take you a long way.
PS – Like most, I don’t trust any ‘initial’ version of an operating system – so going with Vista straight out of the box, without knowing the bug issues and fixes that it may have is not some place that I would rush to be into.
Hope this helps.
Submitted by: Mike R.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Ruth,
The real answer here - it depends. Given you've only told us you've got a Compaq computer, and that you're running Windows 98 on it, we don't really have much, if any, information on the actual nuts and bolts on the computer you've got. Given that it's running '98, the odds are not really all that good that your computer will run XP let alone Vista in a manner you'll be happy with without significant upgrades. Both XP and Vista are more memory and resource intensive than previous versions of Windows and require faster processors and more memory than Windows 98 needed to get them to work properly.
The quick answer - if your computer is more than say, 3 - 4 years old, it would probably be cheaper and less hassle to buy a new system. By the time you gone through upgrading everything - motherboard, CPU, RAM, hard drive, optical drive and the power supply you've pretty much got a new computer as it is. About the only thing you might be able to reuse would be the case - provided you can get the new motherboard and power supply to fit into the old one. And even then, there's the issue of keeping the computer cool. You will probably need to install extra fans. Depending on the case, that may or may not be possible.
The longer (and more in depth) answer - to see if your computer is capapble of running XP at least, you can download the XP upgrade advisor. This is a utility that checks your system to see if it's capable of running XP. Go to Microsoft's web site and search for "XP UPGRADE ADVISOR". It will tell you what components pass muster and which are lacking. (Note, there's a new version of the upgrade advisor to check for the upgrade to Vista available as well). It will tell you if you need more memory, more disk space, or anything else you'll need to upgrade to make it work. It will also tell you which applications you've got that are out of date and won't work properly with XP or Vista. You will have to get newer versions of those apps if you choose to upgrade or do without them if they don't have newer versions.
As far as which OS to go with... That depends largely on how adventurous you are. Windows XP is tried and true and stable. Windows Vista on the other hand, is brand new. While it should be just as stable, if not more stable than XP, there may be issues with it that haven't surfaced as yet.
Submitted by: Pete Z.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Dear Ruth,
The fact that you are running Windows 98 dates your computer and maybe your computer needs and there is nothing wrong with that. I maintain several newer/older computers for family and friends and have always found that the operating system that came with the computer is usually the one that I can get to run best on it. I have upgraded Windows 95 computers to 98 and upgraded Windows 98 computers to Windows Me, with all of these I have always added more RAM. When Windows XP came out the line was drawn, it requires more hard drive space, 512 RAM and decent video or the XPerience can be somewhat disappointing and unless you like looking at an hour glass all the time somewhat frustrating.
Going from Windows 98 to Windows XP may require getting new drivers for your hardware which maybe still available on the Compaq/HP site to download and install but since support for 98 has ended this may not be true. Some Windows 95/98 programs do not run well or at all on Windows XP. Over time Microsoft has tried to phase out DOS based programs so this is usually the problem. Some older computers can not be upgraded to meet these needs and even if they were the cost may out weigh buying a new computer. I would say a Vista upgrade would not be possible at all and I am also not sure that after Jan. 30th Windows XP will be available to purchase retail either.
It comes down to your needs. Most of the computers I work on are for basic things like online, email, iming and some low end gaming, the people are on a limited budget so I just work with what they can afford and tweak out as much speed as I can. I have most all of them over to newer machines (1 to 5 years old) running XP due to their expanding needs to network and use broadband and newer games wanted to be played. Windows XP is slightly more secure for constant online use and much easier to network etc.
I would conclude my opinion would be (without knowing the exact computer/monitor you have) is: If the computer you have is doing what you need don't sweat the cost of buying a new computer and monitor (I suggest a new monitor only because some of the older monitors do not handle the newer video resolutions well) until you have to. If you are expanding your computing needs now may not be a great time to buy a new computer until we see what the prices of Vista computers are going to be like and the dust settles on the people who have to run right out and get it which will be coming out on Jan. 30th. It is also recommended that you let the first group of people test the new stuff out first, wait at least one Service Pack then buy. I am mainly concerned that they may put out entry level systems with not quite enough power to run Vista like they did when they had entry level systems out for the beginning of XP with 256 RAM, once SP2 came out you needed 512 RAM or more to run it nicely.
Hope this helps.
Submitted by: Northlite
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Hi Ruth,
A way to look at the operating systems you have asked about is this, XP stable but on its way out, Vista new and unknown, and Windows98 known and done (still usable for the wait and see crowd). It’s your call. Let’s do an informal review of the options as they apply to your situation which is very similar to mine.
First, we need to see if our computers can handle Vista and what areas need to be improved such as adding system RAM or a new video card. I found on Cnet a Vista Readiness Advisor http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3672_7-6671810.html , which works even in Windows 98. Will it run Vista? Basically the advisor says my computer is not compatible with any version of Vista. My computer’s CPU ( central processor unit, to me and you , its brain) is too slow and there is too little system memory. That means no for me but you would need to try the Vista Readiness Advisor on your computer to find out if it can run Vista.
Second, we would need to find out what other restrictions/obstacles might stop or cause our Vista install to fail. At this time there isn’t an upgrade Vista package for upgrading directly over Windows 98 and I think it will never be offered. From what I have read, the computer must at least have Windows XP Home Basic operating system installed before a Vista in-place upgrade can be done. Based on this we would need to install XP before we could install Vista. There is a more aggressive way to proceed but let’s stick with this approach. Let’s take a look at my computer as a candidate for XP, we know it won’t run Vista. With XP at least my computer will still be able to run the newer software and should be more secure against viruses and hacker attacks.
By comparing the minium requirements for XP I know my computer meets those requirements see ( http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/upgrading/sysreqs.mspx ). Another obstacle would be getting XP drivers for the hardware that is in my win98 computer. I have tried to get these drivers (small programs that let hardware like a soundcard work with the operating system) and found that I can’t. My computer maker does not provide driver support for an XP upgrade.
I could press on and try and load XP and then see what parts of the computer no longer work (not a task for a novice and always backup the computer’s files before attempting a project like this). Let’s say I did and the display, DVD, USB ports, and keyboard work and XP actually loads without a problem but the modem, soundcard, and video card don’t work due to no XP compatible drivers. At this point I would have a slow computer with poor display quality, no sound, and no working modem. I would need to replace the non functioning hardware with new hardware that has XP compatible drivers (this requires opening the computer and replacing parts, not a job for a novice). That more than doubles my upgrade cost and the gap between a new computer and this upgrade becomes much tighter. Even just upgrading a Windows 98 computer to XP may cost as much as a new computer particularly if you take into account your time and efforts and if you pay a computer shop tech to do it for you, you will pay more than the price of a new computer.
It’s still your call and because your computer is a Compaq you can go to their site (Compaq is now owned by HP, http://welcome.hp.com/country/us/en/support.html?pageDisplay=drivers ) to see if you can get the XP drivers. You will need to identify all your hardware that will need an XP compatible driver and then download the drivers and burn them to a CD for safe keeping (this is not a job for a novice). If you press on and load XP and find that you too have a slow computer with poor display quality, no sound, and no working modem. You would need to replace the non functioning hardware with new hardware that has XP compatible drivers (this requires opening the computer and replacing parts, not a job for a novice). Here we are back at the price gap between a new computer and this upgrade becoming much tighter. I will tell you what I would do, or more to the point, what I did. I bought a new computer With XP already installed and kept the old win98 computer and still use it today but that is another story.
Let’s press on and say that you were able to load XP and the computer works great. Some programs that work in windows 98 will not work in XP, two examples would be Microsoft’s Office 97 and Rixio’s Easy CD Creator 4. In this case you just would buy newer versions and install them. But if you decide to try a Vista upgrade on your now XP computer save you money till you get Vista to load. So you go and buy a Vista Home Basic upgrade package and install it on your now XP computer. Guess what, the driver problem starts all over and you may even find that your BIOS fails to be compatible with Vista and your computer fails to boot. The basic input output system (BIOS) is what boots your computer, damage or lose it and your desktop is useless. At this point you can see that there are just too many unknown factors, too many things that can go wrong. What I recommend is that you buy a new computer that has the OS you want, that comes with a warranty and keep your old Compaq till you are happy with the new computer and its OS. If the new computer is not right take it back and you can use the old one till you find a new computer that is right.
Later, recycle the old computer, see (http://reviews.cnet.com/4002-7600_7-6667713.html ) or turn it into your own Linux learning lab computer (Linux is not for everyone but I tried it on my computer using a live CD called “Knoppix”. I take the CD out and re boot and it’s a Windows 98 computer again, very cool. If you want info just “Google it”). If you decide to get a new Vista computer, I would still wait until you can buy your new computer with Vista already installed. If you can’t wait, there are computers being sold with XP installed that have been Vista certified and some come with a coupon for the Vista upgrade.
This link describes the express upgrade process and gives advice on what to look for when buying a new computer, (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/community/wvxpressupgrade.mspx ).
Good luck.
Submitted by: Donald R.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Ruth,
I'm not going to attempt to answer your questions regarding the various problems you might run into by opting to upgrade to either XP or Vista. At this point there simply isn't enough information contained within your question to render a useful response. Of course you could have problems upgrading to either, but you may also have a very smooth and successful upgrade.
However, I would much rather address the issue of to which operating system you should upgrade. I sincerely believe you would be doing yourself a disservice to upgrade to Vista and please allow me to explain my reasoning.
First, XP is a known quantity. Regardless of its faults and issues, with the inclusion of Service Pack 2 and subsequent updates it is a safe and reliable operating system when used in conjunction with secure anti-virus/spyware and a firewall. (this is not to say the operating system itself is unreliable without security applications, but that without security applications you will likely be attacked by all sorts of nasties, thus rendering an otherwise fine piece of operating system as useless) Vista cannot make this assertion. It is only through time in the hands of every day consumers will it become known how much safer Vista will be. As with so very many new products in the marketplace, it often makes sound sense to wait for six months, maybe a year, before diving into the product as it needs time to mature.
Second, and perhaps most obvious, your current computer may not be Vista compatible. It may require dramatic upgrades to your hardware to bring your computer to the level necessary to run even the most basic of Vista packages. Considering your machine is running Windows 98 I think I will go out on a limb and suggest your machine will not be Vista compatible - heck, it might have difficulties with XP if your computer was more of an entry-level machine.
Third, there appears to still be much in the way of tension between the various security software makers (McAfee & Symantec in particular) and Microsoft concerning what Microsoft has done to it's Vista OS. Articles can be found around the net, but one from CNET can be found at:
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6649381.html
Again, and related to my first issue, time may need to pass for all currently unresolved issues regarding Vista to be resolved. It would seem, in my opinion, to be a mistake to become an early adaptor if you do not need to be such.
Lastly, based upon Microsoft's previous behavior I think it's safe to say that Microsoft will continue to support XP (with Service Pack 2) with updates for the foreseeable future; maybe two years. With Vista being in the marketplace for two years by then it should be quite clear whether it is the great OS Microsoft envisions and the issues revolving around Microsoft and the security applications firms should be resolved.
I sincerely hope this helps.
Submitted by: Mark A.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Hello Ruth,
well firstly you would need to determine the specs of your PC and see if its powerful enough to run Windows XP
or Windows Vista.... to be honest if you have a Compaq Presario with Windows '98 on it is likely to be quite old thus meaning
it wont be powerful enough to run either of them or especially Vista, I'm a "I.T Technician" and have repaired/built loads of Computers
and my specs below are what I would recommend for those operating systems (even though Microsoft will tell you that they will
run on slower or lower spec machines....
(this is a sales scam as it WILL run under low specs but performance will be very very poor at Microsoft min. specs)
1. For Windows XP Home SP2 –
500Mhz + CPU (min. Processor speed, so at least 500Mhz) Microsoft say a PC with 300 megahertz (MHz) or higher processor clock
speed recommended; 233-MHz minimum required - (While you will get away with that speed you will be waiting forever for XP
to load / start / start all you start-up programs and everything will be slower especially if you had their minimum RAM requirements
256Mb RAM Min. 512Mb recommended (a PC will just about use ALL 256Mb just to run XP normally with anti-virus but with XP
using the "page-file" (Virtual Memory) running other programs will be OK) - Microsoft say (128 megabytes (MB) of RAM or higher
recommended (64 MB minimum supported; may limit performance and some features) - No Way this is rubbish, XP will run but
performance will be very very very slow.....trust me.....
5Gb Hard Drive space (just for XP) - XP uses about 2-3Gb but you have to compensate for the updates post install AND future updates..
Microsoft say: 1.5 gigabyte (GB) of available hard disk space.... again..rubbish (my Windows XP Pro folder currently stands at 3.64Gb
Including the "Document and Settings" folder which is also part of the XP installation) plus you want more space for programs so the 5Gb
is just to get XP on and a couple of programs and internet...maybe enough for the basics....(Windows/Internet/Word)
2. For Windows Vista
1000Mhz + CPU (min. Processor speed, so at least 1Ghz) Microsoft recommend min speed of 800mhz which is possible but again
the performance would be poorer, I personally have tested VISTA under 1.8Ghz (1800mhz) 700Mb RAM / 40Gb Hard-drive and it ran
ok.... load up times where probably a little longer than XP-Pro (when it supposed to be quicker at loading up...)
512Mb RAM is going to be the minimum spec which Microsoft agree but I would recommend 1Gb as the performance will be much better,
especially if you are running it on a slower CPU (Processor)
Here is a Link to the Microsoft pages with details of minimum specs for each OS (Operating System)
WINDOWS XP-HOME - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/upgrading/sysreqs.mspx
WINDOWS VISTA - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/systemrequirements.mspx
Also.... I would probably recommend that if your PC is powerful enough for either I would go for Windows XP Home Edition.... because its been out so long everyone is used to it, its the cheapest and if you use PC's elsewhere you will know you're way around it as you have it at home but the most important matter is with Vista ...just like XP... when it was first re-leased, this gave all the hackers and virus creaters a chance to find flaws in the system and attack it, then services pack1 then 2 had to made and countless updates... to amend these errors so no doubt VISTA will follow suit, so get XP and give vista time to 'get fixed' hehe (any flaws fixed) and the price to drop....
Submitted by: Paul B.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
If you're running Windows 98, an upgrade to Vista may be nearly impossible to do on your computer, unless you bought a top-of-the-line machine back in the day and you have been upgrading the hardware as time has gone by. You can find out if your computer is ready for Vista by visiting this website:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/systemrequirements.mspx
An upgrade to XP may also present its own problems with hardware and software compatibility--there will likely be some programs, games, and hardware peripherals that will no longer work when you upgrade your OS. However, when you upgrade, you will find a host of new programs, games, software, and hardware that will be accessible to you.
Without knowing the exact hardware specs on your computer (processor type and speed, amount of RAM, hard drive space, etc.), it is really hard to say what problems, if any you will have. But I have two courses of action that you may want to consider:
1. Try upgrading to a version of Windows that is later than 98 but not as new as XP of Vista. 98SE, 2000, Millenium Edition are all older versions of windows that are newer than Windows 98. They can be had on the cheap from ebay or other online sellers. One of these operating systems might bridge the gap for your computer, giving you access to some newer software and hardware while keeping many of the programs that you're running available. Plus, you may even be able to upgrade to one of those OSs with little to no hardware modification to your computer.
2. This might be the time for a new computer altogether. To determine if this is the case, there are three questions you should ask yourself: 1, can you do everything you want to do on your current computer, or with a software upgrade? 2, are there things you want to be able to do with a new computer that your current computer limits you? and 3, are you willing to pay the price for a new computer to obtain those things you answered to in #2? Also, you might want to consider what you would use the old computer for if you purchased a new one: a word processor and internet surfing machine for the kids, a tool to balance your checkbook with, recycle or donate to charity, etc.
In all likelihood, I don't think a jump from 98 to Vista will be a successful one. Even if your computer can handle it, I suspect it would take nearly all your system resources just to keep the OS running. If you're running Windows 98, that means you got 7-10 years of use out of the computer, an impressive feat. And you should also be able to get an equivalent amount of use out of a new computer. Of course, if your computer is running fine and you have no immediate need for DVD burning, iPod syncing, high-end gaming, or the like, then you can keep your current system for as long as it works.
Hope this helps you make your decision!
Submitted by: Jeremy S.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Not really enough info on your pc's specs for an accurate reply. I will, however, go out on a limb and assume you have less than the adequate hardware to run XP or Vista. I say this because you are still using Windows 98. Both XP & Vista operating systems require lots of RAM, lots of hard disk space, fast video card and a fast processor. You have not offered this vital information.
The very first thing I will tell you is that in order to run Vista's Aero, which, after all, is the big draw with this os, you will need at least 1 gig of RAM (1.5 or 2 gigs would allow Vista to run at its' full potential). And you would need at least an 80 gig hard drive (even 80 gigs will disappear if you are a avid downloader or you need lots of software...you should have a 200 gig drive minimum for today's & tomorrow's operating systems). You will also need a modern video card with at least 256 mb of memory. Oh yes...you need a DVD bay due to Vista's enormous file size. It is presented on a DVD. Visit Vista home page for specs and a software program that will tell you if your system can run Vista.
XP is quite resource hungry also. Not the hog that Vista would be to you, but a hog just the same. You would need roughly half of the above resources that Vista needs to run XP. But half the above is still quite a bit considering you are rising up from Windows 98.
Both operating systems will require you to upgrade your hardware. I have been using Windows Vista since October of last year. And, although Vista is nice (eye candy nice), there are lots of issues that still haven't been addressed and some upgrade issues that will never be addressed. There are many programs that will not work with Vista or will not work correctly. Either way...very frustrating.
Definitely give Vista more time and allow it to mellow out a bit. Then, when you can afford it (both money & frustration time), buy a new computer with the proper innards and Vista preinstalled.
I would suggest to you, if I am correct in assuming your pc is not up to XP or Vista, that "if you want to get a better os", to go with Windows 2000. Win 2000 is a very good system and, in fact, is from where XP and Vista were born. Windows 2000 performs very well and most, if not all, your software and hardware will work with it. Plus, and this is a BIG PLUS. Windows 2000 is available at a very attractive price. A small percentage of the cost of Vista and still much cheaper than XP.
This is all assuming your want to stay with Microsoft and their Windows line-up. There are other operating systems out there that require far less resources and are much cheaper and run more smoothly. Linux is one of these with many different flavours of the original source code. So don't forget do some research with Linux.
Submitted by: Tom W.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
You are really in luck on this question! There are several tools available that make Vista upgrading decisions really easy with minimal work for you. But before I tell you about those, here are a couple of quick tests for you: Do you have a DVD player? Do you have at least 1 GB of RAM? Can you still buy RAM for your Win98 computer without taking out a bank loan? (RAM is only cheap when it is popular.) I managed a computer store for a year, so I would bet, without knowing anything more about your computer, that Vista would not be a good choice.
To find out for sure, there are two excellent Vista evaluation tools, one by Cnet and one from Microsoft. The Cnet tool requires an Active x control or Java applet download. This is a small, quick download and the program runs pretty quickly, unlike Microsoft’s tool. The Cnet results give you a “bar” scale (like a phone) to show how well or how poorly your computer is doing on that component. It also lets you choose from 3 tabs: Basic home user, Mainstream user, or Enthusiast.
Here is the address for Cnet’s Vista Advisor:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Desktops/4520-3672_7-6671810.html?tag=tip
Microsoft’s Vista Advisor makes you download and run program. I didn’t have problems with it, but have read some posts from folks who said they had trouble downloading it and that it crashed their computer. It worked fine for me, but took time to download and much longer to run than the Cnet tool. Here is the address for Microsoft’s tool:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/upgradeadvisor/default.mspx
The MSFT tool gives you more of a “pass –fail” type rating system, simply telling you what is inadequate. It’s one advantage is that it also tells you what programs will not work in Vista and need to be removed before upgrading. This is valuable advice!
Despite already guessing that you should not upgrade to Vista, I do think you should upgrade to Windows XP. You need a solid OS that is still being updated for security flaws, and XP is your best choice. Here are the minimum XP requirements, according to Microsoft:
1) PC with 300 megahertz or higher processor clock
speed recommended; 233 MHz minimum required (single or dual processor system); Intel Pentium/Celeron family, or AMD K6/Athlon/Duron family, or compatible processor recommended
2) 128 megabytes (MB) of RAM or higher recommended (64
MB minimum supported; may limit performance and some
features)
3) 1.5 gigabytes (GB) of available hard disk space
4) Super VGA (800 x 600) or higher-resolution video
adapter and monitor
5) CD-ROM or DVD drive
6) Keyboard and Mouse
Real world advice on XP – a faster processor is always better, and have at least 512MB of RAM, 1GB if you do any image editing work. Since you already have Win98 you are qualified to buy an upgrade version of XP that will save you some money. And judging from your old system, XP Home would probably be fine and is cheaper than XP Pro. Since you are two OS changes behind already, I would have an expert look at your computer to see if even XP might be too taxing for it. It isn’t any fun to have a ”better” OS that takes forever to do something because you computer is too slow for it. Be open to new ideas - you might like the idea of getting a laptop and wireless so you can surf from the sofa in your living room!
Am I taking my own advice? You bet – even though my brand new computer will run Vista without a hitch, I will at least wait for the first service pack before doing an OS upgrade. On the positive side, if you need to buy a new machine, what you paid for a Win98 Compaq Presario will buy one heck of a fast, capable computer now!
Good luck, and I hope this information helps.
Submitted by: Merry S.
Other additional advice from our members
by Lee Koo (ADMIN) - 2/1/07 6:03 PM
In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Answer:
Upgrade to Ubuntu Linux instead. Vista just like XP before it will pretty much stay in Beta for the life of the product.
Ubuntu is just as easy to install as to upgrade Win98 to WinXP (don't go anywhere near Vista) and has thousands of free software.
Linux is also more secure and will auto update all the programs you install and not just the security updates like Windows does.
The best thing is that you setup a dual boot and keep your old Windows until you make the transition to Linux.
Submitted by: Timothy L.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Dear Ruth,
I would strongly advise against it. Vista has been built with security in mind and nothing else. While its aeroglass desktop may impress you, as it is supposed to do, it actually has less capabilities than XP or even Windows 2000. It's bad enough that you will be practically interrogated every time you wish to run a new program, constantly hounded for credentials, but there is currently no high-definition audio or video format that will work on it, once again all in the name of security. The standards used by today's emerging innovations are considered "insecure" by the new operating system. Check out this article: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
I have been living in the back of a cul de sac, with five or six wireless networks within range of my own. I was among the first (I should say my grandma was) to be exposed to the botnet outbreak near the beginning of October, and was forced to really do my homework. I have finally managed to assemble a host of security software that is light on resources, is quiet, allows me to run legitimate programs and media as I choose, keeps our machines clean, and is totally free! Here is my short list:
firewall: Kerio Free
AV/AS/anti-spam/anti-fraud: CyberDefender
HIPS: Cyberhawk
browser anti-hijacker: SpywareBlaster
script parent program: ScriptSentry
browser/system scrubber: CleanCache
IE/Firefox anti-fraud toolbar: SiteAdvisor
This list comprises all the security software I use, with the exception of the firewall. I use NetVeda Safety.Net, because I like all the controls. Unfortunately, it's unusable for most people, but Kerio will cover that end for you. Using all of the software on this list, which once again is very light on system resources, you will be able to keep Windows XP perfectly safe while still making the most of it. Hope this helps!
Submitted by: Eric S.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Ruth,
Given the facts that Windows 98 is now considered "obsolete" and is no longer supported by Microsoft, and that XP has now been replaced by Vista, my advice is to leave things as they are. If you're happy with what you've got and everything is working there is no reason to change. The only reason to change any software, and that includes the operating system, is because you want to be able to do something that your current system can't do. Chances are that your current computer isn't capable of supporting Vista and you'd have to invest much to much to use it. Save your money and plan on a new, faster computer which you'll buy sometime in the future, perhaps when Vista Service Pack 1 or 2 has been released.
Submitted by: Barry S.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Get a copy of Windows 2000 and install that.
XP and Vista are probably more than your hardware can handle.
Windows 2000 is, compared to Windows 98, very, very reliable.
Out PC problems declined 90% when we upgraded from Windows 98 to Windows 2000. At the same time we bought a battery backup/surge protector for each PC - not just a surge protector but a battery backup. We put the PC and the battery backup on the desk too.
Those three changes reduced our problems on 10 PCs by 90%.
We have not found XP to be any more reliable.
Also, do all the Windows 2000 updates before installing any software.
Do a clean install, not just an upgrade. I you need instructions on how to do a clean install, I can send that. It takes time but is well worth it.
Problems will nearly disappear.
Submitted by: Charles H.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Please read the following excerpt from the Toronto Star written by Michael Geist. Mr. Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. It is an excellent disclosure of the "fine print" of Windows Vista. It will blow your socks off. Thanks, but NO THANKS!! No Windows Vista for me.
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/175801
Submitted by: Karen M.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
I started out with the exact same computer desktop system as you have. (I'm 'assuming' you're talking desktop because you're saying you have Win 98 on it.) As soon as XP came out my late husband ran out and procured several copies of it and updated that computer from the 98 when he did his own (which since his death have gone bye-bye...long story, NOT for here 
). I ran XP on that Compaq Presario desk top for a while until he built me a custom box at which time my XP was transferred to the new box which has evolved into what I have now…an authentic Fran-Computer! LOL 
The Compaq doesn’t even exist any more, either. It was cannibalized into oblivion (for parts) YEARS ago and as time went on those parts were replaced with upgrades.
I LOVE XP! (....even though it's just a remake of 98, but with "eye candy" and a bit more security, just like Vista is a remake of XP only with yet more eye candy and yet a bit more security.) Or, at least, I DID [LOVE XP] until Microsoft started with its Windows Genuine Advantage program. From what I’ve read in keeping up with IT news, in CNet.com, ZDNet.com, TechRepublic.com and other IT magazines, newsletters, etc., at least 25%, or so, of people running XP are having problems with LEGITIMATE Windows XP Software being read by the WGA as “NON-GENUINE”! And then some of the subsequent nightmare stories a few have told in trying to straighten out the mess with Microsoft are quite intimidating. Luckily I haven't ran into that sort of problem....yet!...and hope I don't EVER! Evidently, all it takes is a crashed hard drive needing to be replaced or some other type of hardware change, especially Mother Boards/Processors, to set it (the WGA) off; according to some of the comments I've read in various on-line forums, message boards and discussion areas.
From what I've read in the above listed resources, Vista could be even worse with that (the WGA thing) AND it [Vista] may not even recognize a lot of older hardware and/or software and/or their respective drivers. Especially stuff as old as your computer is. Even my computer (the processor and mother board are only three+ years old) is likely not to be able to run Vista due to its higher hardware demands (according to a lot of what I've read). I also have some older software that I CAN run on XP that most likely will not be “allowed” on Vista ...that is, if I understand correctly what I’ve read.
Last evening I was shopping for a new DVD ROM when I ran into a demo computer running one of the ‘Versions’ of Vista. I was totally UNimpressed! Oh, it was very “pretty!” but, as an XP user for several years, I found it quite “different” trying to navigate the thing (Vista). I finally gave up my attempt to figure it out after ‘messing around’ with it for about 10 minutes when a sales person came over an asked me if I needed help. We immediately went to look at the DVD ROMs, which is what I was after to begin with.
If you TRULY want good solid information about Windows XP and Vista, I suggest that you type them into your search engine(s) and read, Read, READ about them. You might do yourself a favor by learning about the “WGA” (Windows Genuine Advantage) and the “WPA” (Windows Product Activation) while you’re learning more about Windows XP and Vista. Go into some of the other forums, message boards and discussions in the above mentioned on-line publications and any others you can find to see what other REAL people are saying about this topic...just as you are doing here. The more info the better in this case, right? 
After all, it's your money that's at stake here.
All of the reading I’ve done about Microsoft’s business model as well as Vista, itself has brought me to the decision to research Linux. So far I’ve learned that it can be both daunting to a newbie [Linux user] while some “flavors” of it can be fairly easy to learn with a bit of effort and time. I'm going to find out if there are ways to get my favorite 3rd party Windows based programs to run on it. If so, I think I'll give Linux a good try! Here are a couple of articles about Linux that I ran into through CNet’s News.com EXTRA page to get you started in that direction if you’re curious about that option as well:
A Vista vs. Linux Matchup
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8172748492.html
A Linux For Beginners
http://desktoplinux.com/articles/AT5272648562.html
I hope I’ve helped you at least a little. Good luck in your research!
Submitted by: Julie A.
Addendum - Vista Advisor tool that works with Windows 98
by Kid A - 2/2/07 12:24 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Ruth,
After submitting my answer, I found out CNET currently has a Vista Upgrade Advisor tool that works with Windows 98. Here's the link, in case you want to scan your system:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Desktops/4520-3672_7-6671810.html?tag=tip
From what I have read, it does not appear that Microsoft's own Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor will work with Windows 98. This is why I did not include the link to that tool's download page in my answer.
Miguel K.
Good Luck to you!
by stich1221 - 2/2/07 4:46 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Have fun trying to put vista or even XP on a laptop that has 98 on it!!
You would seriously need to do some upgrading!!!!
More than just the OS!! - Due to the amount of HDD space and RAM that vista and XP need to even start-up!
Nice Work - Two Quibbles
by pmchefalo - 2/2/07 5:39 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
1. If one was targeting Vista Hone Basic for this user, which is probably the only version of Vista it would support, the new graphics card would be a waste - Aero isn't included on Vista Home Basic.
2. Vamosi's article is junk, like most of what he writes. He is constantly trying to sell more and more security software of less and less value.
XP, cost only consideration
by zingerhill - 2/2/07 6:28 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
I ran through a very similar problem recently. I had an old Toshiba laptop that was running 98. It was crashing constantly. I didn't think that I had enough resources to run XP (definitely not Vista). I tried installing Ubuntu. It seemed a little sluggish. After playing around with it for a while, I still couldn't get all the drivers to work correctly.
I installed XP and it works great. Much more stable than 98. I should have done it from the start. The only downside is that it can cost as much as $100 for the upgrade software. At that price, it's almost cheaper to buy a new computer.
Bottom line: If you can find a cheap XP upgrade then do it. Otherwise consider getting a new PC.
test run
by rester - 2/2/07 6:45 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
anyone thinking of updating can give it a free test run at http://www.windowsvistatestdrive.com/ it's vista business but gives you the feel.have fun.
512Mb of RAM for Windows XP overkill!
by asciibinary - 2/2/07 7:39 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
Miguel K. perhaps you have forgotten about the virtual memory Windows XP utilizes With an expert upgrading the system and setting up Windows XP, someone that knows how to turn off services like Themes etc. IMO 128Mb of RAM is plenty for XP not to struggle.
Thankfully I can skip Vista altogether, except on PCs that need multiprocessing (3d Max maybe) and you should too.
Regards,
Vladimir
You do not need 512K of memory
by Sith840 - 2/2/07 8:28 AM In reply to: 512Mb of RAM for Windows XP overkill! by asciibinaryI agree with asciibinary. You do not need 512K to run XP. I have run many machines with 128K and 256K with no problems at all. As long as your disk is big enough and fast enough, the VM keeps it all running OK. You need more if you are using memory hogging applications, especially ones that do not organize their memory use: photo processing, video processing (!), CAD, large Excel spreadsheets, and the like. But for normal home use (MS Word, Browser, Email client, TurboTax, etc), 128K or 256K is just fine.
I upgraded a number of Win98 machines (and one WinME) to XP a few years ago. It was worth it. They ran much faster and booted up faster as well. We never found any apps that did not work fine. More importantly, it made it easier to install better apps like Firefox and Thunderbird (browsing and mail), as well as update some apps that no longer supported Win98.
The only main warning is being sure drivers all work properly. I had one machine with a CD drive that had no WinXP native driver. It worked on XP using the wrapped Win98 driver, but was very slow.
On the other hand, I also agree that now may be the time to replace the machine, before things start to fail. I am afraid that computers do not have the best lifespan. Things like hard-drives and CD drives tend to start failing after 5 years.
I agree
by Luto Lopez - 2/2/07 12:06 PM In reply to: You do not need 512K of memory by Sith840I also have upgraded a half dozen PCs from Win98 to XP for friends & family. If they didn't already have it, I upgraded all to at least 256MB RAM before the OS upgrade. All but one performed better with XP. It was had a 333 MHz CPU, which may have been the problem, but I'm more inclined to think it was more of problem with limited video capability (I couldn't find the specs for it, but it may have had 2MB or less video memory). Even that machine ran Word, Excel, etc "OK" with XP, but it just became "overwhelmed" when it connected to the internet (using Internet Explorer). I didn't try an alternate browser - it may have been OK with something other than IE.
A few of the old printers, faxes etc that people were using were not compatible with XP, but usually they were so old that I had something better and XP compatible, but already "retired" from my own use and setting on a back shelf that I could pass on to them.
Thanks..;)
by asciibinary - 2/3/07 6:03 PM In reply to: You do not need 512K of memory by Sith840Thank you for laying it out, I was a bit lazy with my answer 
Will I need to replace any other components or peripherals?
by GaryT1950 - 2/2/07 8:21 AM In reply to: 2/2/07 Thinking of upgrading my operating system--XP or Vista? by Lee Koo (ADMIN)
I can attest to the veracity of the statement about drivers for printers, etc. in the "Will I need to replace any other components or peripherals?" section. When I got my daughter a new machine running on XP, her old Apollo (HP) printer designed to run on WIN 95/98 had no updated driver available. She had to use a generic driver and her print speed slowed a lot. Guess what daddy had to buy for her next?!?
Again, ask why upgrade now?
by billyfox53 - 2/2/07 9:17 AM In reply to: Will I need to replace any other components or peripherals? by GaryT1950Ruth, so many people take unsolicited advice or make a decision based upon someones shock that you are still running that "old Windows 98" program for instance. Again as stated the question becomes "Why" upgrade?
If you are using 98 and your computer to simply access the internet, emails, or do light applications like word processing, etc. there may be no need. True, many 3rd party applications will not be supporting 98 such as anti-virus purveyors, but some do. Eset nod32 will protect 98 and has updates, and as far as MS not supporting security vulnerabilities, updates, etc. means the very lack of it's continued and declining usage is in a sense some protection as it will not be targeted by the masses of the hackers. You will perhaps find some problems in replacing hardware or peripherals that will no longer have 98 driver support. If you are not using your computer for any gaming, or high-end media applications, the additional "sizzle" of XP or Vista, may not be worth the investment to you.
For sure, you can update some applications and programs to the latest versions, such as Firefox, or Opera browsers, Windows Live Messenger, or the latest versions of Windows Media Player (I think Media Player10)is supported by 98.
Should you decide to upgrade to XP or Vista, upgrade to a new computer in either case. You could get a new computer with these programs already installed for less money than the hardware upgrades to make either work well on your machine alone.
Good Luck Ruth.
98 is not stable
by zingerhill - 2/2/07 12:16 PM In reply to: Again, ask why upgrade now? by billyfox53I thought I agreed with Win 98 being sufficient, but when I went back to 98 I was really disappointed. I found the system to be completely unstable compared to what I have been used to with XP. My wife doesn't really care much about the bells and whistles, but the constant crashing of pre-XP Windows is really hard to deal with (Win 2000 is good too). I also don't think XP runs slower than 98 even on low-end systems.
| Forum legend: | |
 |
Locked thread |
 |
Moderator |
 |
CNET staff |
 |
Samsung staff |
 |
Norton Authorized Support team |
 |
AVG staff |
 |
Windows Outreach team |
 |
Dell staff |
 |
Intel staff |
