At least I don't get "Server Not Found...Try Again" that I frequently got using the latest version of Firefox.
My dial-up, half-hour download got within 56 seconds of finishing and my new Dell E510 hung up and required a manual restart. I ended up going to my local library and downloading IE7 on my laptop in 4.5 min using WiFi.
It installed on my old Compaq 1215US laptop, slowly, and my new desktop with no problem.
It seems to be working fine, so far. I tried it a while back, and uninstalled it, but can't remember why!! I guess I'll know if I like it in a couple of days...Maggie
"Fair play, we all have our likes and dislikes" huh?
Yay for free speech and the right to individual opinion right?
And yet you rabbited on in your "If you could contact them the phones would freeze" comment on this same topic and slammed those who dared to say they like IE7.
Then in another post you're doing the chicken little thing and saying and I quote "Sooner or later Microsoft is going to shove IE7 down all our throats."
Oh really? How exactly is MS gonna force feed you this evil? You have ALWAYS had the option with what updates to download and install and nothing I have seen indicates MS will do any different with IE7.
Read your own post again about the quote you lifted from MS and check out the words "NOT" and "COMPUSLORY" in a dictionary. You shot your mouth off as well the foot you stand on.
By all means make a honest and CONSTRUCTIVE comment, but clearly you have a huge chip on your shoulder over MS ... fix it, bite an Apple and go whine about Steve Jobs.
I have never heard of the word "COMPUSLORY". If it was my error, then fine! It don't bother me. You see, I was having a bit of fun, like some links I've posted in some of my posts here. If you had anything about you, you'd take it as you wanted and be done with it. If not, fine!
You're the one who's getting all worked up here and in a tangle. I'm not. I'm as relaxed as can be and -surprisingly- I will actually help those who need it. I make suggestions, I crack jokes, hey, I even sometimes make a snap at someone. But that's the internet. You've gotta take it with a pinch of salt. I've been down the bad end, was nearly put off CNET by the Admins and Mods because I was getting all worked up about people who praised Microsoft. Then I thought, hey! Each to their own. And so I changed. If people want to use IE, that's fine, I offered a solution to someone the other day and they were eternally grateful.
What I DON'T like is when people come in, with silly remarks when clearly they haven't researched the facts.
I have no tolerance for belligerent behaviour. Been there, done that. IF you keep posting at the rate you do on this forum just to insult (me or anyone else, like the masses who agree that Microsoft is just one big huffup) then I'm sure the Mods will jump on you before the citizens do.
Oh, and I'm two legged, and stand on feet.
Has anyone told you two how pointless it is arguing on the internet. Its like a 100 yard dash for retards, no one wins and you're still retards at the finish line.
Fact is Smithcomp, you did talk rubbish about IE7 being forced upon us by Microsoft so be man/woman enough to admit it.
Poiznous, while I see your point and its clear you are quite right. None the less try to play well with others. More is achieved and its a lot less problematic.
Oh and Smithcomp. Don't pretend you have some substantial following of the masses or the unfailing support of the mods when its doubtful you have either. You are but one of many and there will be some who will agree with you and others who wont. Ive read some of your posts (including the ones that had just been deleted) and its not impressive. Learn to fight your own battles and try using a bit more sense in future, admitting your wrong when you are has no shame, fighting it when you're wrong is stupid.
I didn't mean to imply I had support of the Moderators but more support of the people who aren't that happy with Microsoft. I'm glad poiznous's and my posts were deleted because they were clogging up the forum. However, did you also notice that poiznous was basically targetting any post that implied the person didn't like IE7, and gave them a completel mouthful?
That was really horrid.
Yes I agree he was over the top and I said as much.
Obviously there are those who are anti Microsoft for what ever reason and their position or reasons are debatable. No doubt there is justification however there's equally no doubt many have little or no reason to complain as their issues are often self inflicted.
The lesson you should have learned, and im not sure you have, is that making false or at best misleading comments leaves you open to being challenged. To have said Microsoft was going to force everyone to install IE7 was clearly wrong. If you did not know that, Poiznous did point it out, certainly not as politely as he could but none the less the smart thing from your position was to accept your mistake, make your apology to the forum for making a false and untrue statement and I dare say that would have been the end. However you chose to defend your position and aggravate the situation further.
If you wish to claim the moral high ground now Smithcomp, that's up to you, however I suggest your credibility is still questionable because you even now wont acknowledge your own pivotal role in the issue being raised in the first place.
Be honest in your comments and if proven to be wrong or mistaken then be man or woman enough to admit it and move on. Had you done that from the start I doubt there would have been the need for it to get out of hand or for the mods to have to spend their time cleaning up a mess you played a major part in creating.
You owe it to the forum that you claim to have so much support from to be honest in the information you give. Your personal bias toward Microsoft does not excuse deliberately giving false and misleading information because doing so not only harms your reputation but it also does a disservice to those who seek honest, reasonable and reliable information. Do you understand?
But who exactly are you? All these qualifications on paper don't make you any more righteous to say "Do you understand" and post things that make you sound like you own the place.
Originally, I was only having a joke, and I admit I was over-exuberant, but don't think for one second that I am going to or ever will bow down to someone like you just because you have an arm's length list of studies: I'll be honest; learning from wrote is not the same as being intelligent: the latter comes naturally.
And for anyone else's benefit, I'm in the process of installing Suse LINUX, but I use Windows as well for ease and compatibility.
Besides, I'd actually like to discuss IE, not like Poiznous did and simply joined the forum to offend people - don't get me wrong, but I join forums with the intention of participating and helping, but when people post misstaded ideas blantantly claiming that IE is better than Firefox and all that it's more secure, of course it's going to provoke reaction! The CNET terms and conditions must have been violated a dozen times over with the aggro that poiznous was dishing out.
This is one case where I don't think the entire onus is on a single person, but more a sequence of events that led from personal opinions to insults. In any case, I hope the issue can be considered resolved so that we can all get back to our love/hate relationship with Microsoft and Internet Explorer. ![]()
John
I found IE7 to be of good and bad assets. But, it didn't suit me so I removed it.
Besides, I now use Windows 2000 again so I won't be seeing IE6 soon.
Personally I like IE7 Better than IE6. Only time will tell.
I use Firefox 99% of the time, so will not be using IE7 very much.
Larry
I like IE7 fine except. . . . . . The bottom bar cannot be moved. Now to have to "full page" with F11, which I do not like to do. There is no feature to do a print preview. IE6 had both, an option to add the icon to preview the print page button. And I used to be able to drag the bar too. Far as Tabs to cut the task bar clutter? MY choice. I don't like the CLUTTER of tabs taking more page space from the top. If I tire of "too many" on the task bar, I can close pages. The tab area stays and room is always taken. This is why I turned off the tabs feature.
IE7 has the 'Print Preview' feature. It is located in the same place as most under the FILE.
Bob
Can someone explain the rhyme or reason for separating the Back and Forward buttons from the Refresh and Stop navigation buttons in IE7?
I had been using the most recent IE7 public beta version for several months. When the final version was finally released, I thought this layout issue might be remedied. I was wrong, obviously.
Sorry for my sarcasm, but this is like having the gear selector for forward and reverse on a driver’s left side somewhere with ANOTHER control for other gears way over on the right. Netscape, Firefox, and Opera have all the navigation controls in the same place. So why does Microsoft think that separating these navigation buttons is helpful? Anyone know?
Tony
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |