A couple of years ago I need to switch my main computer from desktop to laptop, so I bought a state-of-the-art laptop, which still works great. BUT.
1) ATI doesn't support the 128MB video card (there is a guy out there who rewrites the ATI drivers for mobile cards, not exactly a professional solution).
2) I do graphics and I can't upgrade the video card.
3) I recently wanted to add a second drive so I could move the pagefile off the system and drive and the manufacturer (Sager) no longer makes the compartment to hold the drive (and you can't put the pagefile on an external drive).
Bottom line, if you want upgradeability and don't NEED to have a laptop, stick w/the desktops.
Mitch
You said :
''there is a guy out there who rewrites the ATI drivers for mobile cards, not exactly a professional solution''
The guy that you're spaeking about is certainly the guy who made the OMEGA drivers. Only one thing : OMEGA drivers are better than ATi Catalyst drivers and delivers arround 50-100 points of more in 3DMark... They generally run higher framerates than the regular Catalyst ones.
Back in 1987, my first 3 PCs were laptops (mostly for work), and I thought they were great. Then I got my first desktop, and have been using them ever since (I still own a laptop for the odd trip where I would need one). So, to me, the key advantage of laptops is "Mobility/Portability". In my opinion, Desktops are far, far better than Laptops. Why?
Power and Space... Two elements that affect customization, expansion, maintenance and cooling.
- Laptops are Almost impossible to fix, clean or upgrade yourself.
- Power-consumtion considerations put Laptops at a disadvantage: They cannot have the most powerful processors, memory chips, audio and video cards nor the biggest/fastest drives. We rarely get them with more than one hard disk, and will never see them with Two CDs/DVDs (At least not with present technology).
- Heat-related problems are more frequent in laptops.
Consider the following;
LESS space = more heat = more cooling = more power = MORE space????
Each two adjacent parts of the equation are correct, only the first and last parts together are NOT.
Having said all that, get both when possible, and if not, the best thing to say is: To each his own. You are the only one to know what you really need, and what compromises you're willing to make.
That is until the next breakthrough in technology.
There are several things that you must remember when trying to compare a desktop to a laptop:
It is not only a matter of 'specs' but a matter of what and how do you want to work with a pc.
Is it comfortable enough? i happen to have a dell d800 (wide screen, 1920x1200 px, 80gb hd, 64mb video, 1.7ghz M processor, dvd burner). It fits my requirements, it is comfortable enough due to the fact that the keyboard is not a 'zipped' one. This laptop disk is a 4200rpm disk, so sometimes it is slower compared to a desktop.
But it also has a built-in wireless card, helps a lot on several situations.
On the other side, I can work easier and faster on my desktop, but it is not easy to take it along with me for several reasons
while that I can do with my laptop.
Hope that helps, everybody will have a different opinion, you will make yours as well, the most important thing is to feel greate when you have done your purchase.
Any info on this would be appreaciated but I've heard that the merom processor is the be the main high end processor for the Intel line when it comes out now if this is true and forgetting about hd speed and graphics cards(yes I know these are relevant) but in theory this would put the same processor in both desktops and laptops allowing the same computing power. As for laptop part inferiority as compared to the desktop couterpart well I'd have to say of course they are your using a machine built to give you the best performance but while maintaing a relativly low temperature and well the price of power until they figure out how to work it otherwise is heat or in other words energy. And well with a laptop you have less room to dissapate the heat naturally and thus either have to wait for technology to catch to make a chip of comparable strengh anyways all common since stuff. Anyways you buy a laptop for portability like a few have said and it will always be more portable than your destop even the 17-19" version that are 12 pounds are lol but those really will fry their hd every year or so as someone else mentioned. But anyways my word is basically this if you want a good computer to go into your room and lay back on your bed and use or just move around the house take the laptop and a good quality one if you want to do some things with it if you want to run all the new games and the best stuff take and portabilty doesn't matter to you take the desktop its not to hard to upgrade on your own but if your running the top parts b4 the heat reduction technology for them comes out you might want to look into a lot of fans or some other type of cooling for them anyways hope that jumble helps anyone out there trying to pick between the two. As a few have said to each his own.
As a student much better I choose destop because it is economy reason. More spare parts to be buyed. Another reason is enviromental friendly and can afford at a low cost.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |