Bob:
Agreed. We could debate the pros and cons of the technology forever. Wi-Fi, as all technologies, has its ups and downs.
Best regards,
Chris
as i said be4....no one here in this country is advanced enough or has the resources to hack in and steal bandwidth or data...
also...people wont bother to do something like this...someone wont even know what the dish antennaz are 4 if they see them on the roof...they'll think that its satellite tv ![]()
As someone pointed out, at either end of your link you are going to have a much wider and farther reaching signal. Protect yourself at least a little bit by using encryption available. Also, if your only interested in the internet access, you could make sure the work access point is connected outside of the internet network. I discovered a company near mine that had their main building link to a warehouse and the signal spill reached over 5 miles away.
FYI - You may want to look at radio modems, though they may not be as fast as you want. http://www.maxstream.net/products/xtend/rf-modem-ethernet.php This one is $400x2 and provides a 115kbs connection and has aes256 encryption. Definitely more expensive than attempting wifi, but rated for allot more miles.
Has anybody thought why someone in Pakistan wants to connect to a remote site 10 miles away, by wireless no less? Do the initials t.a.l.i.b.a.n or a.l. q.a.i.d.a mean anything here?
DITTO that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember we have troops over there, and probably others we care about.
No disrespect to him, but unfortunately we are at war.
Time to end communications with him.
If you are sincere, goodluck to you and your families, and I apologize.
Enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A point to point wireless link that contains Taliban data would be a benefit to NATO forces. The American military has an entire wing dedicated to infowar and whatever encryption they might find to protect this data will range from easily breakable to a little project for the NSA. Remember, the majority of the Pakistani population is not pro-taliban, and the advancement of their technology is detremental to Al Queda's goal of devolution.
Ted Suter
E-Band Communications
www.e-band.com
oh come on!!...u r just toooooo....ya no...lemme tell ya...me dadz a government official n he got 1.5Mbps connection at his office...an i'm sik ov dial up...soooo....it woz a nice prospect ov me havin a T1 connection at home..
that kinda connection costs more than the salary of a PhD professor in Pakistan
so u can see vhere i'm goin wiv dis...no al;q;a;e;d;a or t.a.l.i.b.a,n![]()
It will not be economically viable to connect the two computers use wireless technology. However there is a very cost effective solution if you have a dedicated telephone line available between the two sites. You can connect the two computers using VDSL modems at both ends and can get an effective transfer rate of about 10mbps which is quite decent. VDSL modems are easily available in the market and to configure them is quite easy and hassle free.
You will need to seek a wireless solution such as offered by Verizon, Sprint or AT&T. There is currently no affordable home wireless solution available on the market.
I am so glad that the guy who asked this question received some answers before the big scare about anyone and everyone from a non-european country belonging to the taliban or alquaeda. I learned a lot from the discussion. I live in the United States and have been trying to solve the exact same issue except within a shorter distance. I have chosen to go with the vcn solution. No equipment to buy, and it's a free download.
thankx fer all da gud advice ppl gave me...
i aready replied bout da terrorist scare...go n read it n CLEAR UR MIND
If he was doing this for nefarious purposes, probably would not be so open... would pretend like he was some nice guy/gal (gal would work better) trying to set something up to watch the nice deer or birds at some distant location (which is really a sentry for alerting of a raid on the 'cave'). Every tech can be used for good or evil.
maybe even the computer are dead by now..
I just realized that this post is from October of 2004! I feel like a idiot for spending my time reading through this, let alone posting to this discussion.
That's once, shame on CNET for mailing this out without some disclaimer about the age of the discussion. Next time, it's shame on me for not checking.
According to the original poster's profile, he hasn't been back since October 16th 2004.
Sounds like you are trying to get something for nothing.
Whatever happened to Windows remote desktop? Does anyone use it?
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |