Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Multimedia: DVD-R vs DVD-RW vs DVD+R - which one???

by Baggieboy - 1/3/06 1:07 PM
advertisement
Click Here
Post 31 of 65

DVD-RW wear out quickly

by rc3 - 1/8/06 9:31 PM In reply to: DVD--RW by The Masked Villain

I use DVD-RW to back up large files, writing over
them several times. At first they work fine but often
after 2 or 3 rewrites they give a sector read error
when validating the disc after burning with Nero.
Of course they all get the little scratches that used
discs do but I have tried polishing them with no
success. And I have used different brands of discs.
I have read that you can rewrite up to 1000
times but if the data is corrupt what good is it?

Post 32 of 65

Good brands don't ware out.

by TheMaskedVillain - 1/12/06 3:36 PM In reply to: DVD-RW wear out quickly by rc3

I've been using the same DVD+RW disks for backing up my hard drives for almost two years now without a problem. Yes, late last year Nero InCD had trouble reformatting them, but when I upgraded to Nero 7 InCD worked fine. The DVD+RW format is designed to be rewritten to, that is what the RW stands for.

Post 33 of 65

RW is often best for raw home video

by IndustryVet - 1/18/06 8:27 AM In reply to: DVD--RW by The Masked Villain

If you plan to use any editing software, RW is a cheaper way to get the first generation into editable format on your PC. Many of us don't want hour after hour of boring unedited video to drag our family or friends through.

So, I record my Hi-8/VHS/etc. tape onto RW, take it to the PC, edit with any of myriad software (Ebay has *awesome* prices on prior generations of all the popular video editors like Pinnacle Studio and Cyberlink PowerDirector --think $10 or so!) and then burn onto a final output DVD in either -R or +R depending on where it's going.

RW works best for this since you can reuse this disk. My experience is I can get RW almost anytime I want for about 3 times the cost of single use +R/-R, so if you think you might re-use it more than 3 times, go with RW!

Post 34 of 65

That seems very cumbersome not to mention a loss of quality.

by Kiddpeat - 1/18/06 2:42 PM In reply to: RW is often best for raw home video by IndustryVet

Why don't you directly capture it in a relatively uncompressed format, like AVI, on your computer's hard drive? Then you can edit it as desired, and burn it when you are finished. You are going through an unnecessary extra step, and you are probably losing quality by compressing what's going to the RW disk.

Post 35 of 65

Info. I found regarding DVD+/-

by servicetech - 1/6/06 5:47 AM In reply to: DVD-R vs DVD-RW vs DVD+R - which one??? by Baggieboy

Here's a quote I found on HP's website (wish I bookmarked the page when I found it)

"An independent study done by Intellikey found the DVD+R / DVD+RW format to be more compatible with consumer DVD players than the DVD-R / DVD-RW format."

I had the same question because our company training videos need to be as universal as possible.

Post 36 of 65

That could have something to do with HP being in the +DVD

by Kiddpeat - 1/6/06 10:18 AM In reply to: Info. I found regarding DVD+/- by servicetech

camp. Everything I've read from independent sources says that -DVD is the more universally playable format.

Post 37 of 65

+ vs - format

by jbetta - 1/6/06 8:10 PM In reply to: Info. I found regarding DVD+/- by servicetech

Your statement applies if everyone has a new player.
-R will work in more player both old and New

Post 38 of 65

DVD+R was originally, appears DVD-R is now

by IndustryVet - 1/18/06 2:22 PM In reply to: Info. I found regarding DVD+/- by servicetech

From www.videohelp.com, who has -R/+R compatibility ratings on 4013 DVD players (!), -R seems to hold the current edge:

90% were compatible with +R
but
94% were compatible with -R

The good news is that over 80% of all DVD players play both and actually many of these DVD players would be aging units now, many out of production, so likely the players in production could be assumed to be more compatible with both formats slightly!

Post 39 of 65

-R formats have always been more widely supported.

by Kiddpeat - 1/18/06 2:43 PM In reply to: DVD+R was originally, appears DVD-R is now by IndustryVet

This is not a recent change.

Post 40 of 65

THIS SHOULD HELP

by beau421 - 1/6/06 5:55 AM In reply to: DVD-R vs DVD-RW vs DVD+R - which one??? by Baggieboy

I was wondering the very same thing about 8 months ago when buying a new computer. In short, DVD+R has better compatibility because you can change the Booktype field (this is the part of the disk that tells the player "hey, I am a cd-r, or DVD-r, or better yet, a DVD-Rom) from DVD+R to DVD-ROM, however this cannot be changed with a DVD-R. But there is some caveat, not all dvd burners are able to change the book type field! Or some can, but not with the original firmware (the software for the burner that tells the burner how to operate) so you will need to find some hacked firmware. I finally opted for the NEC 3500 and then found a hacked firmware.
Now, if you are not up to this, the DVD-R has probably the best compatibility without making any changes.

this web site helped me: http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/150

Hope this helped!

Post 41 of 65

Buy +R if your DVD burner can booktype to DVD-ROM

by sytyguy - 1/6/06 6:01 AM In reply to: DVD-R vs DVD-RW vs DVD+R - which one??? by Baggieboy

The reason is, is that DVD-ROM can be played on all standalone players. So if you happen to go play the DVD on your relatives player, it will play.

Of course, you will need to find out if your burner can booktype to DVD-ROM.

BTW, +R are the only type media that can be booktyped, that's why I recommend them over -R.

I have a Benq-1640 burner which automactically booktypes to DVD-ROM.

Good luck

Post 42 of 65

Booktype? Please explain

by twhelan3 - 1/6/06 12:44 PM In reply to: Buy +R if your DVD burner can booktype to DVD-ROM by sytyguy

I have a one year old NEC DVD burner. It will not recognize the DVD-R format. I have 50 new Imation blank DVD-Rs that I can't use. The DVD+R video works fine on my DVD player which is a Panasoic.

Please explain Booktype?

Post 43 of 65

Many burners only support one format. Players are a

by Kiddpeat - 1/6/06 8:38 PM In reply to: Booktype? Please explain by twhelan3

different matter. Newer players can use either format. Older players are most likely to work with -R if they do not support both types.

Post 44 of 65

booktype explained

by beau421 - 1/8/06 2:37 AM In reply to: Booktype? Please explain by twhelan3

i explained it a little already in my response with subject "this should help". anyways, this link should clear it up for you.
http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/150
have a good one.

Post 45 of 65

dvd-rw isn't used

by DocQ - 1/6/06 6:47 AM In reply to: DVD-R vs DVD-RW vs DVD+R - which one??? by Baggieboy

dvd-rw isn't used. For one they're expensive and the dvd-rw itself is expensive too. Once you've got the dvd burnt what good will it do to take it off ... thats a lot of work to just be erasing off the disk. however in the case of dvd-r and dvd+r i wouldn't know. i'd probably stick with dvd-r

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software