Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Spyware, viruses, & security : Norton Internet Security and Routers

by New_guy - 10/19/05 1:38 PM
advertisement
Click Here
Post 16 of 28

No, this is the issue

by New_guy - 11/14/05 2:18 PM In reply to: Here's the issue. by R. Proffitt Moderator

I want it fixed. By being closed, it allows others to detect the computer's presence on the Internet. If you can't help, then let someone else help instead of giving snippy replies.

Post 17 of 28

Hmm, I see you too.

by R. Proffitt Moderator - 11/14/05 2:23 PM In reply to: No, this is the issue by New_guy

Let's just start with GRC's tests are nice but are great discussion makers.

-> By what I mean that I see you is that you must reveal your IP to play games, and to each web site. The concept of stealthing ports is an odd one with little to no extra security.

Since you don't need to expose that port at all, why not configure your router to block that port range?

Simple, effective.

Cheers,

Bob

PS. Why were you snippy?

Post 18 of 28

I see

by New_guy - 11/14/05 2:25 PM In reply to: Hmm, I see you too. by R. Proffitt Moderator

This is all well and good for a computer expert such as yourself. How can I learn anything from short or overly technical replies?

Post 19 of 28

New_Guy, And Did You??

by Grif Thomas Moderator - 11/14/05 2:32 PM In reply to: I see by New_guy

.....follow the procedures mentioned in the post at the link below?:
http://reviews.cnet.com/5208-6132-0.html?forumID=32&threadID=131656&messageID=1537253

Hope this helps.

Grif

Post 20 of 28

Work with me here. Tell me...

by R. Proffitt Moderator - 11/14/05 2:35 PM In reply to: I see by New_guy

Tell me the words you didn't understand. I can't see your face to see at what point you got lost.

-> And here is the bottom line. You are not improving your security one bit here. Hey, this is your choice to work on this non-issue, and I'll help you out but you get to tell me where it hurts.

Bob

Post 21 of 28

Why two messages?

by New_guy - 11/14/05 2:40 PM In reply to: Work with me here. Tell me... by R. Proffitt Moderator

Norton tells me it is an issue and you tell me it isn't. How does someone such as myself figure out what is what?

Post 22 of 28

New_Guy, When In Doubt, Do The Research...

by Grif Thomas Moderator - 11/14/05 2:45 PM In reply to: Why two messages? by New_guy

If nothing else, Google is an excellent tool.

Open Google, type in "Port 113 open" and check the results..Here's a quick search I found. Read the data:

Google Search for "Port 113 Open"

Hope this helps.

Grif

Post 23 of 28

I want it fixed from New_guy to New_guy

by michhala - 11/14/05 10:02 PM In reply to: No, this is the issue by New_guy

New_guy wrote : 'If you can't help, then let someone else help instead of giving snippy replies.'

You have a very unfortunate, rude, pushy and impatient way of expressing yourself in your posts -- I am referring to two of your today's posts to two moderators. Take a hint from the courtous posts in this forum from those requesting information and perhaps it will help with your demeanor.

Miki

Post 24 of 28

Gee thanks for the advice

by New_guy - 11/14/05 10:25 PM In reply to: I want it fixed from New_guy to New_guy by michhala

Sorry but I never asked for your opinion on that post. Furthermore, two moderators were already involved in this post, so please keep out of it.

Post 25 of 28

New_guy

by michhala - 11/14/05 10:39 PM In reply to: Gee thanks for the advice by New_guy

New-guy wrote:
>>Furthermore, two moderators were already involved in this post, so please keep out of it.

New_guy -- Thank you for validating my post......

miki wrote: >>
>>You have a very unfortunate, rude, pushy and impatient way of expressing yourself in your posts -- I am referring to two of your today's posts to two moderators. Take a hint from the couretous posts in this forum from those requesting information and perhaps it will help with your demeanor.

Miki

Post 26 of 28

Miki

by New_guy - 11/14/05 10:43 PM In reply to: New_guy by michhala

You've just validated my opinion of you as an instigator. Things had been resolved in this thread and you had it take it upon yourself to meddle.

Good job!

Post 27 of 28

agree with new_guy, somewhat

by davidows - 11/23/05 10:43 AM In reply to: I want it fixed from New_guy to New_guy by michhala

I'm with New_guy on this. Particularly for a moderator, R. Proffitt seemed to be a bit sarcastic and unhelpful in the first message and very confusing in the second. I couldn't even make sense of this...

-> By what I mean that I see you is that you must reveal your IP to play games, and to each web site.

I think it was meant to say...

What I mean by saying ''I see you'', is that you must reveal your IP to play games, and to *r*each *a* web site.

The following is just his (unsolicited) opinion:
''The concept of stealthing ports is an odd one with little to no extra security.''

The point about revealing your IP address when visiting web sites is irrelevant concerning bots that scan for live systems to hack.

Having said that, I also thought New_guy was unnecessarily uppity for a newbie, especially when addressing his senior, a volunteer moderator.

Post 28 of 28

stealth vs closed

by davidows - 11/23/05 10:22 AM In reply to: Here's the issue. by R. Proffitt Moderator

The safer online system is the one that doesn't run any unnecessary services and doesn't reveal any unnecessary ports. New_guy is smart to want to stealth any ports that aren't needed.

If the user isn't running any IRC or IM apps, it's quite likely that 113 can be stealthed without causing any problems, aside from a possible delay when connecting to mail servers. I have it stealthed and I connect to about 10 different mail servers (5 POP or IMAP & 5 SMTP) without any issues. IM is not allowed on any of my systems.

As provided in Grif's (more helpful) Google search, here are a couple of links to help you understand the issue:

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/225

http://grc.com/faq-shieldsup.htm#IDENT

What hasn't been mentioned is a workaround allowing you to "stealth" any port, if your NAT router supports port forwarding. Most routers I have used do, even a cheap generic one from CompUSA.

By defining the DHCP range to include more IP addresses than necessary, you can forward port 113 to an address so high in the range that it will never be assigned to any system.

For example, define the range as 192.168.100.1 to 192.168.100.199 and forward port 113 (both UDP and TCP) to 192.168.100.199 so any scan of port 113 will be forwarded to nowhere. The lack of response is the same result as a stealthed port.

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software