Version: 2008
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Community weekly poll: Which screen resolution do you prefer?

by Marc Bennett Moderator - 10/20/05 10:35 AM
advertisement
Post 31 of 117

1024x768

by pvaken1 - 10/26/05 1:09 AM In reply to: Screen Reso.. by how

you schould visit a eye-doctor

Post 32 of 117

1024 x 768 on 17" and 19" monitors !

by eeee - 10/21/05 5:27 AM In reply to: Which screen resolution do you prefer? by Marc Bennett Moderator

What else do you need to know? That is my preferred setting. Everyone else is just wasting time writing anything else beyond their fast response to the question - but go to it !

Post 33 of 117

I agree

by lucky76 - 10/21/05 11:55 AM In reply to: 1024 x 768 on 17" and 19" monitors ! by eeee

I agree, 1024x768 is the idea setting for my 19 inch Samsung SyncMaster monitor. Anything smaller and you'll need glasses at an early age.

Post 34 of 117

LG Flatron ez t710bh 1024x768 at 85hz (CRT)

by Kutusov - 10/22/05 9:06 AM In reply to: I agree by lucky76

Of course it depends on the monitor but also on the video card. High-end resolutions demand high-end cards or they will shouke on the graphics processing. So, for this monitor and for a 6600gt (AGP slot) I find this to be the best resolution. And yes, higher res and you will need a magnifing glass to see things.

Post 35 of 117

resolution

by pvaken1 - 10/26/05 1:13 AM In reply to: LG Flatron ez t710bh 1024x768 at 85hz (CRT) by Kutusov

all contributers above schould be wearing glases already. A low resulution like they use results in caracters of half an inch on theyr screens. If they can't read anything smaller, there's something wrong.

Post 36 of 117

1024 x 768 60KHZ Mac 15 in powerbook

by bandaid69 - 10/21/05 6:07 AM In reply to: Which screen resolution do you prefer? by Marc Bennett Moderator

1024 x 768 60KHZ Mac 15 in powerbook

Post 37 of 117

1400x1050

by deshleman - 10/21/05 11:42 AM In reply to: 1024 x 768 60KHZ Mac 15 in powerbook by bandaid69

I use 1400x1050 on a 14" laptop and I love it! However, its not the best for reading text for long periods of time...

Post 38 of 117

Same here

by Dallas Wilm - 10/21/05 2:33 PM In reply to: 1400x1050 by deshleman

I have 1400x1050 also, except on a 15 inch monitor. (HP Notebook) It is its max resolution. On my other desktop computer i use 1024x768 which is its max before getting blurry.

Post 39 of 117

did have... couple years ago

by MotionPixels - 10/24/05 9:07 PM In reply to: Same here by Dallas Wilm

Was 1400X1050 on a DELL Inspiron with 15" LCD but I didn't like the tremendous variation in brightness going from top to bottom of the screen (was my first experience with notebook and LCD) so I returned it for one with a 14" screen in an attempt to minimize the shift in brightness by reducing the overall size. I guess any of you that had-- or have-- the older type LCD's know what I'm talking about here.
Anyway... I was happy with that resolution (1400X1050) since it was good for photos and text after some size settings were made. The 15" would have helped there while I got used to the change from my 19" desktop CRT monitor. Except that LCD's make things much easier on the eyes in the first place, so it isn't too bad going to such a smaller size screen with higher resolution.
Now I have another DELL notebook with 15" screen at 1600X1200 resolution, yet still not of the better quality kind. I think DELL called those other LCD's "Ultra Sharp" at first (maybe still do), but I am okay with saving the money for the lower quality kind.
I also have a DELL Dimension with LCD monitor that is 17" 1600X1200. I just like the 1600X1200 best for the screen sizes of 15" and 17", maybe I would say that of a 19" too if I had one. Any larger and maybe I could use more pixels because I use my computers mostly for photos and computer graphics, not gaming and text; although I suppose games might be better at using larger screens now than when I was buying ones like DOOM, DOOM II, Heretic, Hexen, Quake. I just don't mess around with games anymore.

Post 40 of 117

Screen Resolution

by bpatek - 10/21/05 6:09 AM In reply to: Which screen resolution do you prefer? by Marc Bennett Moderator

I'm using 1600x1200 on a 20" Formac flat panel. I have a friend that just bought a Dell 2400 flat panel and he is using 1960x1200 and it is a beautiful widescreen display, I wish I had the money, it's a $1000.

Post 41 of 117

1920x1200.

by XTrek - 10/21/05 6:14 AM In reply to: Which screen resolution do you prefer? by Marc Bennett Moderator

Where do you buy a 1900x1440 monitor? I've never seen one!

Post 42 of 117

1920 x 1200 for me too!

by alyanm--2008 - 10/21/05 6:48 AM In reply to: 1920x1200. by XTrek

24" Dell LCD and my 15.4" Dell 8600 laptop LCD screen.

Post 43 of 117

(NT) 1920 x 1200 on a 24" Dell

by mcleode - 10/23/05 10:52 PM In reply to: 1920 x 1200 for me too! by alyanm--2008

Post 44 of 117

21 or 22 inch CRT monitors can do this resolution (& higher)

by skipperjohn - 10/21/05 8:43 AM In reply to: 1920x1200. by XTrek

A decent 21 or 22 inch CRT monitor with a reasonably fast graphics card can do 1920 x 1200 with ease (and can use even higher resolutions than 1920 x 1200.

However, it's also important to have a monitor/graphics card setup with a fairly high refresh rate for nice graphics.

I have a nice Mitsubishi FP2141SB CRT Monitor with a Nvidia GEForce 5700LE (far from a very high end graphics card), and it will display up to 2048 x 1536 at 85 hz. I run with 1600 x 1200 at a refresh rate of 100 Hz with this monitor and my graphics card.

Post 45 of 117

HP L2335

by nazcalito - 10/21/05 9:48 AM In reply to: 1920x1200. by XTrek

If you want a flat panel, the HP L2335 diplays that resolution. It costs a little over $1000. It's kind of a funny resolution, not the standard 4x3.

There are plenty of old CRTs around (21 inches or more) that can display that resolution. Whether it will look good is another matter.

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software