Version: 2008
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Windows XP: Win XP Defrag OR Norton Speed Disk?

by dromel - 1/19/05 1:06 PM
Post 31 of 232

XP defrag IS made by Diskeeper Corp, formerly Exec Software

by bostechie - 10/14/05 6:12 AM In reply to: diskeeper by night_stalker_z

Of this I am certain.

Post 32 of 232

DIskeeper

by nedsram - 10/14/05 3:55 AM In reply to: Not a true blue Diskeeper by Rgen72

Just a couple of things.

Diskeeper Lite will defrag disks just fine. It's just that you are pestered with a popup window when you start it, and can't use features such as ''set it and forget it''. But it will warn you when your disk needs defragging and you can do it manually.

As for fat32, I've had problems with Diskeeper on my old Windows 98 PC. It seems to stop doing anything useful - but keeps on accessing the hard disk and consuming CPU resources - once it gets to about 40% complete. If I then stop it and start it again, it tells me that the disk has been completely defragmented.

--
Brian

Post 33 of 232

Norton works quite well for me...

by ron517 - 10/14/05 5:58 AM In reply to: DIskeeper by nedsram

I have been using Norton's Utilities with their version
of disk cleaning for over twenty years now and I have never once had any problems. But I do believe like in anything else once you start getting used to a systems
utility product you and your computer are then locked into and/or defined by that particular product. For my money I am "defined" by Norton because it was 'the very first store bought utility' that I used, that does NOT make it the best disk cleaner out there, just "the BEST" for me.

Post 34 of 232

Diskeeper "Lite" should be sufficient for many people

by ackmondual - 10/14/05 12:39 PM In reply to: Not a true blue Diskeeper by Rgen72

I read articles and reviews that say many ppl, using it only casually wouldn't really even touch those extra features in the full version.

As another winXP example, U don't really need winZip as winXP comes with it's own compression tool to work with .zip files. It's just that again, winzip has more features

Post 35 of 232

Not quite - the built in is OLD

by KathyW - 10/14/05 8:26 AM In reply to: Diskeeper and XP Defrag the same by halg54

The built in was developed by the same guys but was a stripped down version of Diskeeper technology of the 90s. It has been redesigned several times since them and really can't compare as the built in was designed only for sample use and lacks 90% of the features and functionality you get today.

The interface is also extremely outdated as Diskeeper 9.0 is way slicker and has way more to offer.

You can go to wwww.diskeeper.com and get a feature comparison ont he corporate buyer site.

Post 36 of 232

Diskeeper versus XP Defrag

by sirwriter - 10/16/05 10:18 AM In reply to: Diskeeper and XP Defrag the same by halg54

These two programs are definitely not the same. Diskeeper has made Defrag for Windows ever since the first XP O/S was made at least, perhaps longer.

Microsoft had a choice of going with the full program or a scaled down version. They chose the latter. The defrag program that is packaged with Windows is a very slow one that does a minimal job.

Load up Diskeeper 8.0 and see for yourself. The difference is night and day. You can download a version for home use for free, without all the bells and whistles and see for yourself.

Norton is certainly a good program, but it is extremely resource hungry. Try Diskeeper and you'll never look back. (And no, I am not employed by them.)

Post 37 of 232

Not only

by Themisive - 10/31/05 2:47 PM In reply to: Diskeeper versus XP Defrag by sirwriter

Did MS mess up the Diskeeper Lite program - see my comments earlier - it takes a long time, whereas one of the other people who posted a reply said quite correctly that it performed a full defrag is seconds. Since I don't use FAT32, and only use NTFS as it's a much more stable file system, the difference there doesn't bother me, but I've noted several things on MS that don't work as well as they are suppsed to - Notepad is only one of them.

Post 38 of 232

or even BETTER ...

by glennjamen - 1/21/05 7:18 AM In reply to: Try Diskeeper by skippyd333

I've tried perfect disc, speed disc, and the xp defrag, but the best program that I have found for defragging my computer is Perfect Disc. I don't work for the company or own stock in it; honestly, it is the best. http://www.raxco.com/products/downloadit/perfectdisk2000_download.cfm

Post 39 of 232

not even better,,, MUCH BETTER!!

by 1_aceracer - 10/14/05 6:10 AM In reply to: or even BETTER ... by glennjamen

I am a PC Tech and have also tried ALL the defraggers. I have repeatedly had problems with Diskeeper when the disc was heavily fragmented. PerfectDisc has worked when Diskeeper would not! PerfectDisc is my choice,,, your milage may vary!!

Post 40 of 232

even better

by jdels - 10/14/05 7:06 AM In reply to: not even better,,, MUCH BETTER!! by 1_aceracer

I agree that PerfectDisk is the best defragger. XP defrag restarts every time it makes a change on the drive. Norton is sloow. Disk Keeper is slower than PerfectDisk. Also PerfectDisk defrags from Windows XP. No rebooting of the system required.

Post 41 of 232

windows defrag restarting all the time

by YEAHI'MbobDOBBS - 11/27/05 9:43 AM In reply to: even better by jdels

I've experienced the constant restarts in win defrag and found that shutting down my anti virus monitor in the system tray helped.
Also running the defrag in minimized window helps speed things up.
I use older scsi drives and on occaision have tried Norton disk doctor, and have always had problems with norton.
I'll keep using win in-house utility just let it run and walk away for a (long) while.

Post 42 of 232

PerfectDisk

by ssflyer - 10/14/05 8:23 AM In reply to: or even BETTER ... by glennjamen

I agree - this is by far the best I've used, and I've tried most of them, in both personal and corporate environments. Raxco PerfectDisk runs in a single pass and does an excellent, fast job!

Post 43 of 232

PerfectDisk does have some pros over diskeeper...

by ackmondual - 10/14/05 12:43 PM In reply to: or even BETTER ... by glennjamen

last i checked 2 years ago anyways. Things can change alot since each of their respective updates.

PD does the whole defragmenting on one pass. DK takes several passes

PD only requires 5% of free space on your hd while DK requires 15%. PD can usually do a more complete job too

PD tracks usage patterns. First time may take longer, but subsequent defrag sessions are shortened

Post 44 of 232

And if you want to...

by stonehkm - 1/29/05 1:15 PM In reply to: Try Diskeeper by skippyd333

try the free, none automated version first, here is the URL:)
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/dkeeperlite.html

Post 45 of 232

We are sorry, but Diskeeper Lite has been removed. :( :( [NT

by glenn30 - 1/29/05 1:57 PM In reply to: And if you want to... by stonehkm

:(

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software