Discuss the poll for the Wednesday, June 15th AnchorDesk newsletter (http://www.cnet.com/2001-6033_1-0.html):
POLL: How do you feel about Apple's switch to an Intel architecture?
1) Excited about the change
2) Worried about backwards-compatibility
3) I couldn't care less
4) None of these (tell us more in the Lounge)
Being an Apple user since 1978, I have my doubts that things will go wrong with the chip switch. If the Powerbook function will improve, so be it. Steve Jobs is no dumb... flyingears
Apple has a very big percent users (4 or 5). I'm not an Apple user but I like the Motorola consept. It's straight down to basic's, you load a program into memory and execute it from it's possition. Intel swaps program chunks back and forth. That's why PC's have so many crashes. The swapping goes to h..l and it's timeconsuming too. Apple stay where you are and go for it.
The switch is meaningless as I can't afford a G5 or Powerbook anyway, particularly in view that I can get far more bang for the buck in the competitive platform.
Personally I think it sad that Jobs didn't opt for AMD, another perennial underdog, but one which seems to be leading INTEL in both innovation and actual performance.
I think it means an old and venerable very capable company finally making it's return to the mainstream pc world.
| Forum legend: | |
| Locked thread | |
| Moderator | |
![]() |
CNET staff |
![]() |
Samsung staff |
| Norton Authorized Support team | |
| AVG staff | |
| Windows Outreach team | |
![]() |
Dell staff |
| Intel staff | |