Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: ADAM LAMBERT'S A Big Faker
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Home audio & video: Mitsubishi DLP Television WD-57831 Class Action Lawsuit

by jschweikle - 7/25/07 6:43 PM
advertisement
Post 1 of 954

Mitsubishi DLP Television WD-57831 Class Action Lawsuit

by jschweikle - 7/25/07 6:43 PM

Hello,

Is anyone interested in getting in on a class action lawsuit against Mitsubishi and their (known?) defective DLP televisions? I've seen numerous posts regarding lamps, ballast boards, DLP engines, total rebuilds, poorly assembled thermistor sensors, air flow problems, useless repairmen, etc. etc.

I too am experiencing the joy of making 3 Diamond Card payments as well as HD cable programming payments all for a television that stopped working back on June 30, 2007 and has had 2, now a pending 3rd, unsucessful attempts by incompetent "authorized repair centers" to fix it. ITS ONLY 6 MONTHS OLD!!! Randomly replacing parts without performing electronic troubleshooting is totally unacceptable.

Anyway, please let me know if anyone would be willing to sign some papers and get this thing going.

Thanks!

Post 2 of 954

Response to Mitsubishi class action lawsuit

by harryshulman - 7/31/07 11:05 AM In reply to: Mitsubishi DLP Television WD-57831 Class Action Lawsuit by jschweikle

I may be able to help. I have successfully handled a class action lawsuit against Panasonic based on premature bulb failure in a line of LCD tvs. I am currently investigating potential class claims against Mitsubishi. If you wish to discuss this, please contact me directly.

Harry Shulman

Note: this is a solicitation for professional services (a required disclosure in California).

Post 3 of 954

Mitsubishi WD-62628 and WD-52628 misrepresentation as 1080P

by daytripper2 - 12/28/07 7:46 AM In reply to: Response to Mitsubishi class action lawsuit by harryshulman

See the blog tread at
http://www.hdblog.net/2005/11/25/review-mitsubishi-wd-62628

Here many people are upset with Mitsubishi for misrepresentation of their WD-62628, WD-52628 etc DLPs as 1080P, bought them, only to learn that they really will not accept 1080P signal through their HDMI port and for many other problems.

The displayed "1080P" on the front of these TV's at Tweeters, Fry's, Best Buy and other retailers, and in ad's, on the packaging and yet, the user manual does not mention support for anything but 1080i through its two HDMI ports and users confirm it will not accept 1080P signal from Sony Playstation 3 Blueray machines.

Check it out.

Post 4 of 954

1080p tvs incapable of doing 1080i

by hideftvservice - 1/30/08 7:29 PM In reply to: Mitsubishi WD-62628 and WD-52628 misrepresentation as 1080P by daytripper2

there was memo going around that the new sony lcd light engine tvs
were actually not capable of doing progressive scan althouth the box was
marked as 1080

Post 5 of 954

wrong

by Blitz458 - 8/26/08 10:29 AM In reply to: 1080p tvs incapable of doing 1080i by hideftvservice

wrong box?

Post 6 of 954

marks on screen

by steeler458 - 10/18/09 3:20 PM In reply to: 1080p tvs incapable of doing 1080i by hideftvservice

hi i was woundering im renting a mits wd-737 60' and had it for three months, when i watch dark movies or darek in the room i can see a black line almost half way to the middle of screen and another at bottom left,i was just woundering if you have idea what it is
thanks alot..don..

Post 7 of 954

Class Action Suit

by Tracy4251 - 2/13/08 6:29 PM In reply to: Mitsubishi WD-62628 and WD-52628 misrepresentation as 1080P by daytripper2

I just figured out what's wrong with my tv set; everybody else has the same problem. If you are still contempleting a class action against Mitsubishi, count me in.

Post 8 of 954

Mitsubishi WD-52327 TV repairs

by penguin9 - 3/7/08 9:23 AM In reply to: Class Action Suit by Tracy4251

I have replaced the lamp cartridge, and the ballast, but the lamp still fails to come one unless try 2 to 5 times.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

the Penguin

Post 9 of 954

BAD LIGHT ENGINES

by KSoda - 2/1/09 8:28 AM In reply to: Mitsubishi WD-52327 TV repairs by penguin9

LIGHT ENGINES ARE GOING BAD

Post 10 of 954

Mitisubishi WD-62628 bad light engines

by csabatula - 4/8/09 9:32 AM In reply to: BAD LIGHT ENGINES by KSoda

Has anyone started the class action suit yet against Mitisubishi. TV only 2 years old and is shot. We purchased from Sound Advice and they are out of business as well. Lamp went, as well as color wheel, optic block and light engine. Cost $1700 to fix a $3000 set.

Post 11 of 954

RE: Mitisubishi WD-62628 bad light engines

by WebMonkey23 - 4/8/09 12:00 PM In reply to: Mitisubishi WD-62628 bad light engines by csabatula

Did you contact Mits? They extended the warranty on some of the models by an additional 2 years. So if you're TV was or is 2 years old it may be covered.

Post 12 of 954

Bad light engine on Mitsubishi Wd-62628

by csabatula - 4/9/09 5:13 AM In reply to: RE: Mitisubishi WD-62628 bad light engines by WebMonkey23

I did contact Mitsubishi and will be waiting on an answer. They wanted some info faxed in from the authorized service rep and will review it. I am hoping it gets us a warranty extension. Thanks. Will let you know.

Post 13 of 954

Warranty extension from Mitsubishi

by csabatula - 4/28/09 5:14 AM In reply to: Bad light engine on Mitsubishi Wd-62628 by csabatula

I contacted Mitsubishi customer service and was taken care of expediently. They covered the costs of all parts for the TV, optic block, color wheel which was over $900. I did have to cover the cost of the service call, labor and the lamp. It still ended up costing me all-in-all about $525, but much better than $1500.

Post 14 of 954

RE: Warranty extension from Mitsubishi

by WebMonkey23 - 4/28/09 9:39 AM In reply to: Warranty extension from Mitsubishi by csabatula

Why wouldn't they cover the labor or service call? When I had my problem they covered both.

Post 15 of 954

Warranty extension from Mitsubishi

by csabatula - 4/29/09 4:34 AM In reply to: RE: Warranty extension from Mitsubishi by WebMonkey23

Not sure, but I wasn't pressing my luck. We did not buy an extended warranty and the TV is 2 1/2 years old. Guess I should have pressed more, but didn't.

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software