Simplify your laptop buying
General Mac hardware discussions: 3.06ghz duo vs 2.66ghz i5 quad
3.06ghz duo vs 2.66ghz i5 quad
by Fuzz18500 - 11/9/09 3:35 PMIm worried if i get the duo it will be outdated soon. I think developers of programs and games will start to make better use of the quad core but am not sure if they will and if it is enough to spend more money for quad. After some consideration. I've decided to get an imac but am unsure as to which is the better value over time.
Go with the i5
by Kevin M. Dean - 11/9/09 8:44 PM In reply to: 3.06ghz duo vs 2.66ghz i5 quad by Fuzz18500Go with the i5, it's the latest gen processor and is better in every way over the Core 2 duo chips, which are already outdated last gen processors.
So on one hand...
by BeatleMegaFan - 11/12/09 4:17 PM In reply to: 3.06ghz duo vs 2.66ghz i5 quad by Fuzz18500you have been asking about the difference in value between Macs and a given PC, but you have already made up your mind to purchase an iMac? You seem to be a bit confused.
As the previous poster mentioned, the i5 chips are newer and thus, more powerful and (probably more) efficient. I've seen the 27-inch iMacs at the store, and I must say, the screens are gorgeous and if I could, I would definitely take one home to replace my G4. I believe that Apple is constantly expanding multicore support within each dot release of OS X, although I can't say for certain if Adobe and other major software publishers are currently supporting all of the cores Apple and Intel throw in there. Snow Leopard itself can handle them, but third-party applications may or may not. Get what works for you. The 27-inch iMacs hold incredible value, considering you're getting a top-notch Mac with a gigantic monitor. With the proper cables, you can even retool the monitor to work with external peripherals now, something that all previous iMacs have not been able to do. If you're like me, and you have an Xbox or a similar machine sitting next to your computer gear, this could be extremely convenient and useful. Spring for it if you can.
-BMF
Well I was
by Fuzz18500 - 11/13/09 6:58 PM In reply to: So on one hand... by BeatleMegaFanI mean just because apple has nice advertisements does not mean i will not try to find flaws in it to figure out whats true or not. Im simply making sure it is a good value. Which apperantly it is.
Ok, glad you got it sorted out
by BeatleMegaFan - 11/14/09 3:50 PM In reply to: Well I was by Fuzz18500Apple's ads aren't perfect, but I don't think I've ever seen one that was completely false. The only problem with their ad campaign is they spend way too much time attacking the competition rather than promoting the many benefits of their own products. Why tell your target audience that you should escape from something when you can just offer them something better instead? Macs can advertise themselves.
The 27-inch iMacs are great deals, regardless of the processor choice. I don't think upgrading to the i5 would make a significant difference, or the i7 for that matter, unless you are bent on running some heavy-duty editing software, although most probably don't support multicore chips. Whichever configuration you get, I doubt you'll be disappointed with it.
-BMF
| Forum legend: | |
 |
Locked thread |
 |
Moderator |
 |
CNET staff |
 |
Samsung staff |
 |
Norton Authorized Support team |
 |
AVG staff |
 |
Windows Outreach team |
 |
Dell staff |
 |
Intel staff |
