Version: 2008
Advanced Search
advertisement
advertisement

Forum display:

Storage: Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire

by wiredhurdler - 2/19/09 9:37 AM
advertisement
Click Here
Post 1 of 12

Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire

by wiredhurdler - 2/19/09 9:37 AM

I am trying to decide if I should connect to an external hard drive via Ethernet cable or USB or Firewire. Of the three, which is the fastest way to transfer files to an external hard drive?

Post 2 of 12

Don't know much about ethernet, but..

by ahtoi - 2/19/09 9:44 AM In reply to: Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire by wiredhurdler

firewire would be faster than USB.

Post 3 of 12

Here

by R. Proffitt Moderator - 2/19/09 10:22 AM In reply to: Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire by wiredhurdler

It was just a drag race with USB and firewire swapping positions as we swapped between Windows, Apple and Linux.

Today, with USB 2.0, Firewire 400 you may want to use what works best for your setup.

Forget Ethernet unless you can go to 1Gg (1000Mb) or better.
Bob

Post 4 of 12

(NT) Thanks for the help

by wiredhurdler - 2/20/09 10:46 AM In reply to: Here by R. Proffitt Moderator

Post 5 of 12

speed on just USB or Firewire

by Joliet Eddie - 2/20/09 8:22 AM In reply to: Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire by wiredhurdler

Remember that your transfer speeds will also depend on the specs on the external hard drive. Firewire and USB 2.0 are pretty close. If you have a Firewire port on your laptop/desktop go for it. USB ports can be finicky and there are reports of some laptops and desktops having USB port failure for no apparent reason. That happened to my wife's laptop last year. We got her a new machine, but luckily the old one HAD a Firewire port, too, so we were able to get her files off the old machine and onto an external drive that way.

Post 6 of 12

More choice with USB

by Zouch - 2/20/09 7:57 PM In reply to: Read and write speed -ethernet vs usb vs firewire by wiredhurdler

USB 2.0 and Firewire 400 are much the same, I doubt you'd notice the difference. But certainly here in the UK, USB external drives are far more plentiful than firewire and the competition keeps the prices a tad lower.

The specifications for Firewire 800 and USB 3 are in the final throes of standardization but as far as I am aware, nobody has yet committed to make external drives for them when available.

Currently, Gigabit Ethernet would be faster (as stated earlier, don't even think about anything less than gigabit) BUT you'd be looking at attaching an iSCSI box as your external drive and these are definitely priced for business and not for consumers.

One other possibility is an eSATA drive. SATA PC cards with an external aSATA port are becoming readily available but again, they aren't as cheap as USB.

Post 7 of 12

eSATA is what I use...

by rae2_2 - 2/21/09 5:23 AM In reply to: More choice with USB by Zouch

My internal and external drives are all SATA II and all seem to work as fast as I need. To be truthful, when I compare my old system (two IDE drives) with my new one (two SATA II) drives, this human cannot really tell the difference in performance. Both seemed to do the trick for my needs (surfing, photography incl Photoshop, etc.).

I got a Seagate 1TB eSATA external not long ago. Works just fine. I've never used a USB or Firewire external so I can't compare for you.

BTW, would someone please explain to me WHY we need BOTH Firewire AND USB? I'm getting more than a little pi**ed off at manufacturers who decide to reinvent the wheel unnecessarily. Once some technology has evolved to a satisfactory state LEAVE THE DAMN THING ALONE! I'll murder the next jerk that comes up with yet another SCREWHEAD design, for example, or even another ME TOO/LOOKALIKE automobile. What BS!

Post 8 of 12

Take it easy. It's only computing, hehe.

by ahtoi - 2/21/09 10:28 AM In reply to: eSATA is what I use... by rae2_2

When people stop buying then they'll stop making them.

Post 9 of 12

Too bad "people" most often have NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE BUYING

by rae2_2 - 2/21/09 1:40 PM In reply to: Take it easy. It's only computing, hehe. by ahtoi

... but you're probably correct, ahtoi, but please note that, IMHO, "people" are noted for buying (and doing) what makes no sense at all.

This world needs Firewire about as much as a teenager needs pimples. But... a fancy title has sold an awful pile of garbage (books, music groups, vaporware, software... you name it.) Most people have not been taught the skills necessary to critically analyze what they see, hear or read. Which is likely the MAIN reason for the global ECONOMIC catastrophe we all face today.

More FIREWIRE!!!!!

Post 10 of 12

USB/FIREWIRE

by davidj2i - 2/23/09 7:53 AM In reply to: eSATA is what I use... by rae2_2

Then USB 3.0 comes out 10x faster than 2.0, then maybe we try firewire over UTP... Why do we need both? Why do we need OSX and VISTA? Competition-good. If there were only one standard, we would have to wait until all the bugs are fixed before we could get any new releases ;)

Post 11 of 12

I agree with you on OSX..especially when I can't afford one,

by ahtoi - 2/23/09 11:09 AM In reply to: USB/FIREWIRE by davidj2i

HAHAHA...but I am eagerly waiting for USB3 though.

Post 12 of 12

Yeah..I know the spec. is about the same (usb2 & firewire),

by ahtoi - 2/21/09 10:21 AM In reply to: More choice with USB by Zouch

but My experience says firewire is faster or all my computers (3) has lousy usb2. Personally I think eSATA is the way to go but I don't think the poster has that.

Forum legend:
Locked Locked thread
Moderator Moderator
CNET staff CNET staff
Samsung staff Samsung staff
Norton Authorized Support team Norton Authorized Support team
AVG staff AVG staff
Windows Outreach team Windows Outreach team
Dell staff Dell staff
Intel staff Intel staff
Powered by Jive Software